How can it be? Camaro SS 1LE faster around a track than Boss 302? - MustangForums.com



Off Topic A place for you car junkies to boldly post off topic.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-10-2013, 03:55 PM   #1
ghunt
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
ghunt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 729
Default How can it be? Camaro SS 1LE faster around a track than Boss 302?

Someone told me about this recently and I had to look it up for myself. In apparently every head-to-head where it's been run, the Camaro SS 1LE is faster around a track than a Boss 302, despite weighing more and being at an 18 hp deficit. WTF?

Example:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...-camaro-ss-1le

And it's not even a small difference, it's like 3 seconds! Again I say, WTF? Does the Camaro's IRS make that much of a difference? Does it have better tires? Is it both?

I feel deeply saddened to learn of this...our bad boy track Mustang can't even beat a plain jane SS with some upgraded suspension bits...
ghunt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 04:00 PM   #2
XEDES
2nd Gear Member
 
XEDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 163
Default

I think it really does come down to a better suspension setup. Maybe that's why Ford went with the IRS for '15.
XEDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 04:04 PM   #3
tigercrazy718
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,731
Default

its not just a plain jane SS. it has a completely reworked suspension geometry similar to the ZL1, and it had weight stripped out from the regular SS i believe. i also think it has better tires as well. it was designed to beat the boss, while the boss IMO was a decent start at a track mustang but at the time they had nothing to beat
tigercrazy718 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 04:20 PM   #4
XEDES
2nd Gear Member
 
XEDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Indiana
Posts: 163
Default

You have to let GM have something after Ford stole their thunder by releasing the GT500 numbers before GM could even roll one ZL1 off the assembly line.
XEDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 05:10 PM   #5
Diabolical!
5th Gear Member
 
Diabolical!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 4,495
Default

Some cars are faster than others depending on the test used. No use crying into your pillow over it.
Diabolical! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 05:21 PM   #6
07GrabU
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Ohio
Posts: 348
Default

Wonder if the Laguna seca boss would have been a different result?
07GrabU is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 05:53 PM   #7
jRaskell
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NH
Posts: 154
Default

The Boss 302 runs a 255 front tire.

Pitiful.

End of discussion.
jRaskell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 06:00 PM   #8
03gt04mach1
3rd Gear Member
 
03gt04mach1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Acworth,Ga.
Posts: 812
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diabolical! View Post
Some cars are faster than others depending on the test used. No use crying into your pillow over it.
^^^^ I AGREE with this quote.
03gt04mach1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 06:42 PM   #9
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,330
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghunt View Post
Someone told me about this recently and I had to look it up for myself. In apparently every head-to-head where it's been run, the Camaro SS 1LE is faster around a track than a Boss 302, despite weighing more and being at an 18 hp deficit. WTF?

Example:
http://www.popularmechanics.com/cars...-camaro-ss-1le

And it's not even a small difference, it's like 3 seconds! Again I say, WTF? Does the Camaro's IRS make that much of a difference? Does it have better tires? Is it both?

I feel deeply saddened to learn of this...our bad boy track Mustang can't even beat a plain jane SS with some upgraded suspension bits...
When it comes to suspension & handling, the devil truly is in the details. I don't feel saddened by this turn of events at all - if anything it's vindication of a few of my own thoughts plus a fresh look that I might be able to crib some direct benefit from.

Some of the difference is based in the 1LE Camaro option having 285/35 tires all around instead of a staggered arrangement (i.e. 255/xx front, 285/xx rear). It just seems to me that crutching an inherently understeerish big'n' little tire configuration with oversteerish suspension tuning in the hopes of it coming out right under all driving situations is the wrong way to go about it.

The 1LE runs an unusually wide rear wheel - 11", this for 285/35-20's in a regular production US domestic car. Many Camaro enthusiasts criticize the appearance of 285's on 11's, but this is without fully understanding that looks do not equate to lowered lap times (or perhaps in many cases not really caring about that kind of performance). This is another one of those details, where the wider rear wheels - the 1LE front wheels are 10's - help ensure enough understeer to satisfy corporate standards without wastefully throwing away wads of front tire grip (via little front tires) to get there.

I doubt that you'll find very many successful autocrossers running Mustangs with staggered tire sizes. Sam Strano didn't, and I don't think Terry Fair did more than the one time where he found it to be a poor way to go. I know that Terry has used staggered wheel widths to very good success; 4th place against more fully sorted ESP cars at last year's SCCA Solo Nationals with 11" and 12" wheels and what I recall were 315/30-18 tires all around.



Once you get into forced induction and particularly positive displacement supercharging as in the GT500 or ZL1, there is some legitimate basis for tire size staggering. The package is already unbalanced towards brute power and needs a crutch or two for driveability reasons (aka additional cushion against spinning out in case your right foot gets a little sloppy).


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 07-10-2013 at 06:57 PM.
Norm Peterson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2013, 06:53 PM   #10
99GTvert
is my username.
 
99GTvert's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Earth
Posts: 13,218
Default

I'm pissed.
99GTvert is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vintage AC shop referral - frontrunner serpentine system bradleyb Classic Mustangs (Tech) 3 11-27-2015 08:50 PM
Vintage AC shop referral in los angeles bradleyb California Regional Chapter 0 10-01-2015 02:02 AM
Moroso... PBIR... Track night? CS2007 Florida Regional Chapter 0 09-29-2015 01:06 PM
20 inch Wheels a mistake on 2015 Mustang GT? mungodrums The New S550 2015-2017 Mustang 10 09-28-2015 11:54 PM
What is the difference between Ford Racing 2015 Street Handling vs Track Handling ? mungodrums Suspension 0 09-24-2015 11:12 PM


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:42 AM.