Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > Pipes, Boost & Juice
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Pipes, Boost & Juice Talk about Exhaust, Nitrous, Blowers, Turbos, Superchargers... whatever makes you go faster!
Sponsored by CARiD
Click Here

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-31-2006, 08:09 PM   #1
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,654
Send a message via AIM to Fallstar01
Default Positive Displacement Supercharger Info

I just wanted to inform some people about positive displacement superchargers.
There are several "Brands" out there.

Ford OEM
Ford Racing
Roush
Allen Engineering
Saleen
Kenne Bell
Whipple

Let me clear up some confusion about the compressor (The main part with the screws that has the displacement):
Eaton:
--Ford OEM on the Lightning, both 03/04 and 07 Cobras, and other cars except the Ford GT have an Eaton compressor.
--Ford Racing's 2V supercharger has an Eaton Compressor.
--Roush Superchargers (that I've seen) have Eaton Compressors.
--Saleen Series I and Series II have Eaton Compressors
--Allen Engineering Superchargers have Eaton Compressors.
Whipple:
--Ford GT's supercharger has a Compressor from Whipple
--Ford Racings Cobra upgrade has a Compressor from Whipple
--Saleen Series IV, V and VI all have Compressors from Whipple
Kenne Bell:
--Makes aftermarket kits for most Modular Ford Engines.

The Eaton is referred to as a "Roots" supercharger and the most common compressors on ford engines are the M90 and the M112. Oddly enough, it's screws look much more like twins than the twin-screws.

This is where it gets tricky because they are all interconnected:
SRM liscensed twin screw compressors as early as 1951
SRM formed a sister company: Opcon Autorotor.
Opcon Autorotor parted ways with SRM.
SRM formed Lysholm.
Lysholm formed a partnership in the U.S. with Eaton.
Opcon bought Lysholm.

Kenne Bell uses Autorotor Compressors.
Autorotor is a subsidiary of OPCON, a swedish company.
OPCON bought out Lysholm in January of 2004.
Up until 2005, Whipple used Lysholm Compressors. Now, Whipple makes their own.

Kenne Bell and Whipple have been in competition with eachother since roughly 1991 however they both use a very similar design. Kenne Bell explains why it chose to use Autorotor compressors over Lysholm in the following article this page.
There was a backlog of Whipple orders and rumors that the company may be going out of business. It turns out that Whipple has since moved away from lysholm compressors and now manufacturers their own units in-house.
Here is a great link from Whipple's site on the history of the twin-screw: History of the Twin Screw.

Regarding Lysholm's future:
"The demand for our products on the US aftermarket remains strong and a new sales organization will enable us to meet the increasing demand and further develop the existing potential in the US automotive and Marine aftermarket. We will further develop our distribution channels and our support for these products in the US," says Martin Stenbäck, CEO of Lysholm.

Eaton/Roots:
Click the image to open in full size.

Autorotor/Whipple/Lysholm Twin Screw (I believe the 4/5 lobe design is more common than the 3/6 pictured below)
Click the image to open in full size.

It's important to note "Twin Screw" superchargers tend to be more thermally efficient.
Here is a link to a good site with detailed info on how these superchargers work (as well as centrifugal SCs):
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/supercharger.htm

Some Links:
Autorotor
Lysholm
Eaton
Allen Engineering Superchargers
Kenne Bell Superchargers
Whipple Superchargers (site was down when I wrote this)
Saleen Superchargers
Roush (Run a search for superchargers)
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
'02 GT vert - white/tan - Supercharged.
Up Coming Mustang Parts: extra idler pulley around SC, front heat exchanger
Fallstar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2006, 08:50 PM   #2
Tim37
4th Gear Member
 
Tim37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 9700 Mustang GT
Location: AR
Posts: 1,925
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

wow lots of good infor this needs to be a sticky.
__________________
"Build a man a fire and keep him warm for a day, set a man on fire and keep him warm for the rest of his life."
00 GT
97 GT
Tim37 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 11:01 AM   #3
Fallstar01
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Posts: 1,654
Send a message via AIM to Fallstar01
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

I've made a few updates and corrections. Let me know if anyone else has any input that would be useful.
__________________
'02 GT vert - white/tan - Supercharged.
Up Coming Mustang Parts: extra idler pulley around SC, front heat exchanger
Fallstar01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2006, 04:24 PM   #4
Birdieman4
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location:
Posts: 3,018
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

Great info, Fallstar.
Folks, notice the helix style rotors on the screw diagram. They make for a much more efficient contact point, and thus less heat is generated.

Good stuff, Fallstar.
__________________
02 S281E #60 R.I.P.
01 S281 #582 Procharged

http://www.ihra.com/profile/topfuel/rick_cooper.html
Birdieman4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-06-2006, 01:50 AM   #5
KnotBand
I ♥ Acer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 186
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

my only comment is about terminoligy.....the title says positive displacement and yet, you talk about rotary type compressors....

positive displacement usually refers to something of the piston type.....like your engine, or your shop compressor, or your home AC compressor......they rotary technology (screw and scroll type compressors) is more efficient, more reliable, and more versitile than positive displacement equipment and usually more expensive. Screw compressors are used a lot on large chillers for unloading and on large industrial air compressors for efficiency since compressed air is the most expensive utility...

just thought I would point that out....but as a disclaimer, I don't know anything about superchargers and this might be an industry standard term eventhough it would not be consistant with normal industrial terminology.
KnotBand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 01:12 AM   #6
tt460
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 14
Default RE: Positive Displacement Supercharger Info

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Fallstar01

Whipple:
--Ford GT's supercharger has a Compressor from Whipple

<--stuff removed-->
The Eaton is referred to as a "Roots" supercharger and the most common compressors on ford engines are the M90 and the M112. Oddly enough, it's screws look much more like twins than the twin-screws.
<--stuff removed-->
Eaton/Roots:
Click the image to open in full size.
All good information, and you even help to explain the twisted history of the screw compressor (no pun intended), even though I still don't fully understand it.

I have three picks here with some points you made above:

1) The Ford GT's Supercharger *is* in fact assembled by Eaton. The rotating group might have components sourced from Opcon/Autorotor/Lysholm or maybe even Whipple, but the Ford GT supercharger was designed by Eaton engineers, tested by Eaton and manufactured by Eaton. Eaton licenses the screw compressor design and has the right to manufacture and sell them. Why doesn't Eaton sell more screws? Most OE manufacturers still choose the Eaton Roots design over the screw compressor due to cost, reliability, availability, NVH, and low power consumption at cruise due to the lack of internal compression.

2) The rotors of an Eaton are not twins. The image above is very misleading. Eaton superchargers in fact have a left and a right rotor that are mirror images of each other. I think if you'd have a tough time spinning the example of the Roots blower shown above.

3) The diagram referenced above is in fact of a "Roots" compressor, but not an Eaton Roots. Even so, it is incorrect for a plain old Roots. Lets imagine the rotors were correct and that you could actually spin the rotors in the direction shown above. With the rotors moving in the direction the arrows point, the inlet and outlet would be reversed (i.e. "fill side" on bottom, discharge on top). The air travels along the OUTSIDE of the case and then it is discharged as the rotors begin to mesh and the air reaches the discharge port.

What makes the compressor above not an Eaton? Eaton superchargers all have "axial" inlets similar to a screw as they draw air into one end and then discharge air out the top or bottom (depending on orientation).

As for KnotBand's comment: Roots and Screw compressors are both positive displacement compressors. Each revolution they take, they will move a fixed amount of air equal to their displacement (at least in a perfect world, since alot of other things come into play like inlet restriction, clearances, etc). A centrifugal compressor is not a positive displacement compressor since the volume of air it moves is not fixed and varies greatly with RPM.
__________________
'79 Fairmont Restomod - 32-Valve DOHC conversion
'78 Fairmont Twin Turbo 460 - <retired project>
http://www.undrprsr.com
tt460 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2006, 08:16 PM   #7
VARifleman
3rd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location:
Posts: 533
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

Quote:
ORIGINAL: KnotBand

my only comment is about terminoligy.....the title says positive displacement and yet, you talk about rotary type compressors....

positive displacement usually refers to something of the piston type.....like your engine, or your shop compressor, or your home AC compressor......they rotary technology (screw and scroll type compressors) is more efficient, more reliable, and more versitile than positive displacement equipment and usually more expensive. Screw compressors are used a lot on large chillers for unloading and on large industrial air compressors for efficiency since compressed air is the most expensive utility...

just thought I would point that out....but as a disclaimer, I don't know anything about superchargers and this might be an industry standard term eventhough it would not be consistant with normal industrial terminology.
This is incorrect as positive displacement means there is a certain amount of air displaced in a movement. In the case of a piston, it's the volume that is taken up by one piston stroke, thus moving or compressing that air. The roots and twin screw are positive displacement because they always move the same amount of air in one rotation, just like a piston moves a certain amount of air in a stroke.
__________________
2004 Mustang GT
Full Cobra Brake Conversion
K&N FIPK CAI
MGW Short Throw
H&R Sport Springs and Full Length Subframes
275/315 Sumitomo HTR Zs
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2266031
VARifleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2006, 03:56 PM   #8
itzztrick
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 26
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

Thanks for the info. Appreciate it.
itzztrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2007, 03:26 AM   #9
jlauth
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location:
Posts: 357
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

It has been a long time since i have put anything on this site, and for this i am sorry, but i have been very busy. On the other hand, good psost man. Great history on the SC’s that are commonly used on the terminator, but im gonna be honest In saying that roots type SC such as the Eaton M112, which can be found on 03-04 in often called a blower as opposed to a compressor. This is because the blowers force the air (at a high velocity) around the supercharger case or housing, thus compressing the air. A twin screw is considered a compressor because it compresses the air at in between the male and female supercharger blades, which were specifically designed to have the correct amount of mass air flow and PSI through the outlet area of the compressor. Both have are reffered to differently because of the diffrent compression process that occurs.
Quote:
ORIGINAL: KnotBand

my only comment is about terminoligy.....the title says positive displacement and yet, you talk about rotary type compressors....

positive displacement usually refers to something of the piston type.....like your engine, or your shop compressor, or your home AC compressor......they rotary technology (screw and scroll type compressors) is more efficient, more reliable, and more versitile than positive displacement equipment and usually more expensive. Screw compressors are used a lot on large chillers for unloading and on large industrial air compressors for efficiency since compressed air is the most expensive utility...

just thought I would point that out....but as a disclaimer, I don't know anything about superchargers and this might be an industry standard term eventhough it would not be consistant with normal industrial terminology.
NO it is wrong to correct him. Both an engine performing the perfect otto cycle, and the supercharger are indeed both positive displacement. Yes it is more common to refer to the rotary style pump (twin screw and roots superchargers) than the reciprocating pumps as positive displacement, but they are both indeed positive displacement pumps, and yes the superchargers are more efficient, more reliable, and more versitle than than most common air compressors, and even most gas motors (if you dont take into account the ignition of the A/F mixture), thus the price of these supercargers. Chillers often do indeed use screw compressors, which are still of positive displacement and yes i do agree that they are expensive, but the main power sorce of air and electric is coal.
jlauth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 06:32 PM   #10
reesmach1
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 4
Default RE: Positive Displacement Superchargers

kenne bell makes their own compressors on their big bore kits now.
__________________
rees r mohundro
reesmach1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-18-2007, 06:32 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
46, allen, cobra, compressor, diagram, displacement, eaton, engineering, ford, m112, mustang, parts, positive, supercharged, supercharger

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Magnacharger info on here Eddie3 GT S197 General Discussion 20 02-23-2008 10:20 AM
Turbo or Supercharger? 91GT 4.6L V8 Technical Discussions 58 06-07-2007 11:59 AM
Supercharger opinion Martin123 2005 - 2014 Mustangs 11 11-21-2005 10:01 PM

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:04 AM.

Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup