You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Much better!
I was right, and it's because it's a one piece panel.
It's clean all the way across. The 67 tail lamps are actually better. Less crowded...
The GT/CS bumper would look much better than the one on that picture.
It's way too fat.
I dunno...
It must be for someone who misses their SUV! The rear is like one big wall. Does the trunk look functional anymore?
And the chrome around the tail lights shouldn't come to a point like that. But I guess the import fan who designed those never saw photos of the real deal from 67?
I've posted this before...
The only way to pull this off right, is to have that tail section in one piece across the back.
Which means, extensive custom work on the trunk lid.
It has to be just like the 68 Shelby...
That particular car looks like ass with that ugly ducktail.
It's flat and too tall, yikes!
Yeah.. What Pascal said. That ducktail is skyscraper tall
__________________
USAF (Retired) / Gas Turbine Controls Systems Engineer (Current)
Current: 2010 Ford Mustang GT Premium, Grabber Blue, (401A) Premier Interior Char /w Grabber Blue Stripe, 5-Speed, 3.73 rear, Electronic Pkg (Nav), 19" Painted Nickel Luster Wheels, Comfort Pkg, Security Pkg...
Current Mods: FRPP lowering springs, Roush O/R Exhaust, tinted windows, 3M Clear Bra, Headlight / Fog Tint
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company