The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > S197 Handling Section
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-19-2009, 06:53 PM   #1
Sleeper_08
3rd Gear Member
2008 Ford Mustang
 
Sleeper_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicle: 08 Mustang GT
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 998
Default Mustang Vs Camaro Vs Challenger

I just finished reading the print version of the June 2009 Motor Trend article comparing the Mustang vs Camaro vs Challenger.

Very interesting, even though the Camaro was considered best by a hair over the Mustang.

The Mustang had the Track Pak installed and was the best overall on handling in spite of the solid rear axle.

Here is the link to the web article http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/..._gt/index.html
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
White 08 GT Roush S/C 445 HP/KDW2 285/40/18 tires/18 x 9.5 Steeda Ultralite wheels/ Steeda Competition springs/D Specs/FAYS2 Watt's Link/LCA/Adj UCA & Mnt/Upper strut mnts/GT500 Brake Kit/GT500 Front LCA/X5 Ball Jnt/Bmp Str + more
Sleeper_08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2009, 11:00 PM   #2
Legion5
5th Gear Member
 
Legion5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: Saleen Thinger, Vert, Bike, Magic Pumpkin.
Location: Bright Springs Posts: 13,541
Posts: 2,473
Default

That's what 600 lbs does in comparison to a well designed solid axle.
__________________

::Cornering with the Tail Drifting at 110 mph::

Tip of the Month, October: Do not buy the $730 Roush Exhaust which a Mangnaflow rep says costs to $117 make (polished, all ss), buy the $170 Roush Exhaust Tips estimated to cost $46 to make and weld them to another company's muffler. This also lets you choose how your car sounds.

Rear seats, superior to carrying your children in your mouth. - Mustang vs Corvette slogan
Legion5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 10:23 AM   #3
Argonaut
4th Gear Member
 
Argonaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Harrisburg PA
Posts: 1,358
Default

I was driving the other day and a new Challenger pulled along side. That car is a boat! Ridiculously large. Its nice looking but come on Chrysler...what were you thinking? I've yet to see a Camaro outside of a car show (where it sat behind a rope).
__________________
07 GT 5spd: stock > road racing > stock.
Argonaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 10:33 AM   #4
wingman75
5th Gear Member
 
wingman75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 2007, Mustang GT
Location: Sterling Heights, MI
Posts: 3,727
Default

I read it too and was kind of amazed the Mustang did so well. Now if Ford will add some HP Mustang will be #1. At first I thought the Camaro was pretty nice looking but the more I see it the stranger it looks to me. The Challenger has always been a heavy pony car right from the start in the 70s.
__________________

CDC Ducktail, CDC Chin Spoiler, CDC Sequentials, SHR 1/4 Window Louvers,
BMS Silver Stripes, Mini Antenna, Agent 47 Grille, Underdrive Pullies, Boomtubes,
GMS CAI, SCT Tuner, 93 Custom Tune, 3.73 FRPP Gears, Spydershaft, Roush Springs,
Mach II shifter, Powdercoated Steeda Cam Covers, DD Blk Bullitts/Goodyear Eagle F1s

WWW.MOCSEM.COM

Last edited by wingman75; 05-20-2009 at 10:36 AM.
wingman75 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 10:35 AM   #5
Texotic
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,161
Default

I've seen the new Camaro, Challenger, and 2010 Stang on the road already. The Challenger looks good, but it's way too large. The Camaro and Stang both look really good on the road. The new rear end on the Stang is still having to grow on me, though.
__________________
2005 Satin Silver GT Manual
Euromax 612's w/ Nitto NT555's
Tunable Induction/XCAL2/93 Tune
Steeda Rear Swaybar & G-Trac Brace
Corsa's
Sequentials
Waiting to be installed: BMR Adj. Street Combo LCA's
Texotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 11:24 AM   #6
jayel579
2nd Gear Member
 
jayel579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Mustang GT
Location: Mine Hill, NJ
Posts: 348
Default

I went and kicked the tires on the New Camaro about 2 weeks ago and I have to say Government Motors (a.k.a. GM) dangled this carrot in front of us for way to long and they did not deliver IMO. If you were to sit inside a 300, Magnum, Charger they are all the same car. Chrysler has a nice car in the 300 but not a performance car, though I am so impressed with the "light weight" non-street drag performance Charger model at something like 3400 lbs :/

Maybe I am playing the favorite side here but I think the Camaro and Challenger will carry nice street status but zero credit on the track.
__________________
"I have made a bar graph of my favorite Pies and I made a pie chart of my favorite Bars" - Marshall Eriksen
jayel579 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 01:41 PM   #7
Texotic
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: College Station, TX
Posts: 2,161
Default

With the LS3 under the hood, I have a hard time seeing the Camaro end up with zero track cred. Now, I do bet that you see a lot of em with a Ford rear end...
__________________
2005 Satin Silver GT Manual
Euromax 612's w/ Nitto NT555's
Tunable Induction/XCAL2/93 Tune
Steeda Rear Swaybar & G-Trac Brace
Corsa's
Sequentials
Waiting to be installed: BMR Adj. Street Combo LCA's
Texotic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 02:41 PM   #8
tx-skydiver
1st Gear Member
 
tx-skydiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Vehicle: 2007 Mustang GT
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 109
Default

Good article, but it is very predictable that the newest vehicle will always win.
__________________
2007 GT - Performance White
3.55 gears / manual trans
Flowmaster Axle-Backs
CAI
SCT X3 Tuner

tx-skydiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:39 PM   #9
ab
2nd Gear Member
 
ab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Vehicle: 2007, Ford, Mustang GT Premium
Location: Massachusettes
Posts: 209
Default

I to was impressed at how well the Mustang did. Maybe there will be an IRS in a future Mustang.
__________________
ab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-20-2009, 03:45 PM   #10
blksunshine
 
Join Date: May 2007
Vehicle: 07 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 31
Default

The new Camaro is a good idea, but implemented poorly. The windows design is ridiculous. The side windows are so short it's uncomfortable to put em down and put your arm out and drive. How did the GM engineers screw that up? I love my stang!
__________________
07 GT
WMS CAI, Brenspeed 93 Oct. tune, FRPP diff cover
Spydershaft, and Royal Purple in engine, trans, diff.
blksunshine is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2000, 2006, 2007, 300c, 445hp, camaro, camero, challenger, charger, gt, loses, motor, mustang, trend, vscamaro

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company