The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 2005 - 2011 Mustangs > S197 Handling Section
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-11-2009, 10:47 PM   #11
14901490
2nd Gear Member
 
14901490's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Vehicle: 2005 Mustang GT
Location: webster, ny
Posts: 190
Default

Why not just go with the HT 10s on the rear also??
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
14901490 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2009, 11:27 PM   #12
EdwardGT
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 96
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 14901490 View Post
Why not just go with the HT 10s on the rear also??
I've found it effective to run a less aggressive rear pad in cars that have a front weight bias.
EdwardGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2009, 01:43 PM   #13
Philostang
3rd Gear Member
2006 Ford Mustang
 
Philostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Mustang GT
Location: Chicago
Posts: 566
Default

I'm currently running Carbotech XP10s on all four corners. The rears have lasted longer than fronts, and the OEM pad compound is definitely garbage (I don't even like them on the street). So I'm inclined to agree with Edward on the matter.

I seem to be a minority in running the XP10s on back. Mike Jr. at Carbotech told me many of his S197 customers run the 10s in front and XP8s in back, so again, Edward probably has a legitimate point. I will say that I love the 10s all around. She comes down hard as heck, very composed, and I usually have no problem out braking most of the cars I run with. I can brake in just about any manner at will; it's very confidence inspiring. My suspension is fully upgraded, but I couldn't tell you what part(s), if any, seem to help me manage the 10s in the rear better, but its working for me.

Best,
-j
__________________
2006 Mustang GT Premium: Tungsten...w/upgrades.

"We accelerate from corners, not christmas trees, and the length of our drag strip is dictated by the distance to the next braking area." -Carroll Smith

http://www.hubgarage.com/mygarage/DrJohn
Philostang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 03:50 PM   #14
dkegel
1st Gear Member
 
dkegel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 93
Send a message via AIM to dkegel
Default

Just another (rather late) data point here, but on the track I run Hawk Blues all around (which are very aggressive) and my front/rear pad wear is very even. The Mustang does a very good job of using it's rear brakes.

Dave
__________________
FRPP springs, Tokico D-Specs, Steeda G-Trac/X5 balljoints/bumpsteer kit, Hellwig RSB, Magnaflow, C&L CAI/Evo tune, UDPs, CMCV deletes, Hurst, 4.10s, Quantum brake cooling, Earls SS lines, ATE fluid, Hawk Blues (track duty), 18x9/18x10 WedSports, Goodyear Supercars 255/45 & 285/40
dkegel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 04:01 PM   #15
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Vehicle: 06
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 7,665
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by EdwardGT View Post
...I really didn't expect the stock pads to do so badly since I was running on street tires - not R-comps.
Man, it's no mystery that the stock rear pads are worthless even under normal daily driving...
Mine started to disintegrate 3 weeks ago, lol.

I'm surprised Ford didn't get any law suit on that one yet.
__________________
pascal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2009, 06:36 PM   #16
EdwardGT
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 96
Default

Well I decided to run PFC01's w/ Stoptech's up front and PFC97's on the stock rear setup. I'll upgrade to the PFC Z-rated caliper kit at some point I'm sure.

-Edward
EdwardGT is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2006, 2010, bads, big, brake, cooling, friction, gt, kit, mustang, pads, performance, pfc, rear, roush, s197

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:36 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company