Notices
S197 Handling Section For everything suspension related, inlcuding brakes, tires, and wheels.

Watts link manufacturers? Pro and cons?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2011, 08:48 AM
  #11  
Norm Peterson
6th Gear Member
 
Norm Peterson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: state of confusion
Posts: 7,635
Default

Originally Posted by candymanjl
It's already off center and with my 305 rears you can really tell
That does change the sequence some. If you're OK for a little while with car rake that might look a bit, ummm, unusual (and come with a likely sacrifice in handling), you could do the front springs & struts separately from the rear springs/shocks/WL. I'd probably do the front first in that case, which would let you postpone the WL expense. Sta-bars would be left as a completely separate mod if/when you decide to do them.


Have you done enough measuring to know whether the tires will clear after lowering even if the axle gets centered perfectly with respect to the right and left side sheetmetal? Will there be enough clearance around the shoulders of the tires up at the inside and outside tops of the wheel wells to allow some reasonable combination of cornering roll plus a little suspension bump travel? Sorry, I don't have much "feel" for how much room is left with a 305 tire of unknown profile on rims of unknown width and offset.


Norm

Last edited by Norm Peterson; 07-12-2011 at 08:51 AM.
Norm Peterson is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 09:33 AM
  #12  
Ford_Dude
5th Gear Member
 
Ford_Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baytown, TX
Posts: 3,115
Default

well if its a case of centering due to lowering while yes the watts link will do that great a cheaper fix is an adj-panhard

though I dothink the watts link is the better fix as the adj-panhard just corrects for the lowering and the watts keeps it centered through full travel
Ford_Dude is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:08 AM
  #13  
908ssp
3rd Gear Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 645
Default

I like the Techco design except for the none adjustable rods. Saleen might be coming out with an improved design since they stopped Techco from making theirs. I just don't like adding a bunch of weight to the axle with the clamp on systems. The pivot on the diff doesn't add as much unsprung weight as the clamp style. I made my own Watts link using a lot of aluminum, titanium and adjustable rods with one poly bushing. I can hear a bit more gear whine then before but only at certain speeds. The diff cover looks heavy but it is no heavier than most of the reinforced aluminum covers.

908ssp is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:17 AM
  #14  
candymanjl
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
candymanjl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally I was looking at the BMR adjustable panhard bar then I could lower it and have things mostly centered. Ideally I'll buy things right once and then just do one install.
candymanjl is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:45 AM
  #15  
candymanjl
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
candymanjl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
That does change the sequence some. If you're OK for a little while with car rake that might look a bit, ummm, unusual (and come with a likely sacrifice in handling), you could do the front springs & struts separately from the rear springs/shocks/WL. I'd probably do the front first in that case, which would let you postpone the WL expense. Sta-bars would be left as a completely separate mod if/when you decide to do them.


Have you done enough measuring to know whether the tires will clear after lowering even if the axle gets centered perfectly with respect to the right and left side sheetmetal? Will there be enough clearance around the shoulders of the tires up at the inside and outside tops of the wheel wells to allow some reasonable combination of cornering roll plus a little suspension bump travel? Sorry, I don't have much "feel" for how much room is left with a 305 tire of unknown profile on rims of unknown width and offset.


Norm

I'm running 18x9.5 +38mm wheels all around, 275-40-18's in the front, 305-35-18's in the rear. It's tight but it should be fine with the rear travel.

Maybe I'll look into the front and rear adjustable coilovers first and keep the ride height stock for now. Then the suspension geometry shouldn't change much. When I save up for the other parts then I can lower the car.
candymanjl is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 10:51 AM
  #16  
candymanjl
4th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
candymanjl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,190
Default

Originally Posted by 908ssp
I like the Techco design except for the none adjustable rods. Saleen might be coming out with an improved design since they stopped Techco from making theirs. I just don't like adding a bunch of weight to the axle with the clamp on systems. The pivot on the diff doesn't add as much unsprung weight as the clamp style. I made my own Watts link using a lot of aluminum, titanium and adjustable rods with one poly bushing. I can hear a bit more gear whine then before but only at certain speeds. The diff cover looks heavy but it is no heavier than most of the reinforced aluminum covers.

Nice! Looks very good for something you made yourself!
candymanjl is offline  
Old 07-12-2011, 12:52 PM
  #17  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

Originally Posted by 908ssp
I like the Techco design except for the none adjustable rods. Saleen might be coming out with an improved design since they stopped Techco from making theirs. I just don't like adding a bunch of weight to the axle with the clamp on systems. The pivot on the diff doesn't add as much unsprung weight as the clamp style. I made my own Watts link using a lot of aluminum, titanium and adjustable rods with one poly bushing. I can hear a bit more gear whine then before but only at certain speeds. The diff cover looks heavy but it is no heavier than most of the reinforced aluminum covers.
I should point out that the net weight gain of a Fays2 (and a Steeda is very slightly lighter) vs. the stock PHB and PHB brace is on the order of 15-17 pounds. In fact a Fays2 boxed and shipped with all the hardware, packing, etc. is just under 30 pounds in total.

One reason I prefer the Fays2 and Steeda... the roll center is adjustable. Another is that I don't want the diff cover and it's little bolts constraining the lateral forces of the entire back end of the car.

Really, if you look at the two setups, the one 908ssp likes and the one I do, you'll see both use a very similar propeller and arms. But the Fays2 and Steeda don't require thicker diff covers (which makes shedding heat more on an issue, and again allow you adjustable roll center heights, easily done as well.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 10:03 AM
  #18  
908ssp
3rd Gear Member
 
908ssp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 645
Default

I don't SELL watts links. You want the best buy Griggs. http://www.griggsracing.com/product_...be3cc122a4d785

908ssp is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 11:12 AM
  #19  
Sam Strano
Former Sponsor
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,936
Default

Guess I must be wrong since I sell parts. Ooops. But Griggs isn't, even though they sell parts. Hmmmm, double standard?

BTW, which one do you have 908ssp? And feel free to enlighten us on what makes the Griggs superior. Please. I manage to pull the same g number out of a S197 on the same Hoosier A6 tires they do (sometimes more) on smaller rims, in heavier cars, for a lot less money. I saw spikes of 1.5 and sustained G for over 1 second of over 1.3 G last month at a ProSolo in Michigan in my '11 on 315 A6's on 10.5" wheels with "basic" mods. Koni's, H&R Race springs, Strano bars, and a Fays2 Watts link. In fact with those mods I run Super Stock times. That's Lotus Elise, Grand Sport and Z06 Corvette territory. What crap it must be!

Edit to add a few thoughts:

I compete to win. I won't run crap that doesn't work on my car. I value a dollar as much as the next guy, and a Fays2 is the best bang for the buck there is in a Watts link. It does what it is supposed to, and works.

Last edited by Sam Strano; 07-13-2011 at 11:30 AM.
Sam Strano is offline  
Old 07-13-2011, 04:20 PM
  #20  
Sleeper_08
4th Gear Member
 
Sleeper_08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,692
Default

Originally Posted by Sam Strano
..... a Fays2 is the best bang for the buck there is in a Watts link. It does what it is supposed to, and works.
And that is why I am running one.
Sleeper_08 is offline  


Quick Reply: Watts link manufacturers? Pro and cons?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 AM.