Notices
S197 Shelby Section This section is for technical discussions pertaining specifically to the latest installment of the Shelby Mustangs; the Shelby GT, the CS6, and the awesome GT500.

The SVT PP vs non-PP gear ratio misnomer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-09-2012, 04:01 PM
  #1  
Autobahn Shelby
Thread Starter
 
Autobahn Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
Default The SVT PP vs non-PP gear ratio misnomer

SVT PP vs non-PP: gear ratio misnomer

Hello everyone. A quick check around the forums as well as the rest of the internet, and you’ll find it to be a common misnomer that the SVT Performance Pack equipped 2011 and 2012 Shelby GT500’s have an advantage in acceleration due to the shorter 3.73:1 rear gear ratio versus the non-SVTPP’s rear gear ratio of 3.55:1.

I say there's effectively no difference.

The difference between the two ratios is about 5%. What what is frequently overlooked, is the fact that the SVTPP’s tire size (285/35-20) is exactly one inch (or 3.9%) taller than the non-SVTPP’s 285/35-19’s. The taller tire effectively cancels out most of the benefits of the shorter 3.73:1 gears. In the end, the torque multiplication benefit (combining tire diameter and gear ratio) of the SVTPP is a miniscule 1% „better“ than the regular Shelby. That’s effectively like going from 3.55:1 to 3.59:1 (if there were such a ratio). Which is peanuts.


Sorry if I’ve just pointed out the obvious to some of you, but take a look around, and it’s interesting to see just how many people are under this (wrong) impression.


(Discounting the fact that acceleration on stock tires would probably be worse with 3.73:1 vs 3.55:1 gears, due to traction issues, all else being equal. But that’s a different topic altogether.)
Autobahn Shelby is offline  
Old 02-10-2012, 07:48 PM
  #2  
2cokeman
5th Gear Member
 
2cokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 3,471
Default

How about the stock tire size on the 08 with the 3.31 gears compare to the 3.55 on the 2010+?
2cokeman is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 01:21 AM
  #3  
Autobahn Shelby
Thread Starter
 
Autobahn Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by 2cokeman
How about the stock tire size on the 08 with the 3.31 gears compare to the 3.55 on the 2010+?

The 2008's 285/40-18 tire is actually about 0.5% taller than the 285/35-19 on the 2010's. Multiply that with the 7.3% taller gearing, and you end up with a combination that is 7.8% taller on the 2008 vs the 2010. Effectively the 2008 is like running a 3.29:1 gear vs. the 2010's 3.55:1.

That's all else being equal. Because I've been completely ignoring transmission gear ratios. I'm assuming they'Re the same 2007-2012.
Autobahn Shelby is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 10:23 AM
  #4  
cheftjpeck
5th Gear Member
 
cheftjpeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 3,834
Default

Originally Posted by Autobahn Shelby
The 2008's 285/40-18 tire is actually about 0.5% taller than the 285/35-19 on the 2010's. Multiply that with the 7.3% taller gearing, and you end up with a combination that is 7.8% taller on the 2008 vs the 2010. Effectively the 2008 is like running a 3.29:1 gear vs. the 2010's 3.55:1.

That's all else being equal. Because I've been completely ignoring transmission gear ratios. I'm assuming they'Re the same 2007-2012.
Awesome info.. On your last point... In fact I have read that the gearing ratio is different in the 11 and 12's I believe... I know they did something with 1, 2 and 3 if I'm not mistaken ... Something about doing it so shifting was smoother or something like that.. I will try and find the exact details and post
cheftjpeck is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 12:01 PM
  #5  
Autobahn Shelby
Thread Starter
 
Autobahn Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by cheftjpeck
Awesome info.. On your last point... In fact I have read that the gearing ratio is different in the 11 and 12's I believe... I know they did something with 1, 2 and 3 if I'm not mistaken ... Something about doing it so shifting was smoother or something like that.. I will try and find the exact details and post
Hey, cool. I know the 2013's gear ratios have been redone.


.
Autobahn Shelby is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 01:01 PM
  #6  
Autobahn Shelby
Thread Starter
 
Autobahn Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
Default

Looks like 1st through 4th gear ratios stayed the same from 2007-2012. But they changed 5th and 6th for the 2010-2012 models.

http://media.ford.com/images/10031/2011_GT500_Specs.pdf

http://www.muscularmustangs.com/2006...helbygt500.php
Autobahn Shelby is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 07:07 PM
  #7  
2cokeman
5th Gear Member
 
2cokeman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Ontario,Canada
Posts: 3,471
Default

Thanks.
2cokeman is offline  
Old 02-11-2012, 09:48 PM
  #8  
IA Shelby
1st Gear Member
 
IA Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 68
Default

I have a 2011 non svtpp with 3.55. Changed to 3.73 gears. Personally wished I would have kept the 3.55.
IA Shelby is offline  
Old 03-06-2012, 12:59 PM
  #9  
Autobahn Shelby
Thread Starter
 
Autobahn Shelby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Germany
Posts: 48
Default

Originally Posted by IA Shelby
I have a 2011 non svtpp with 3.55. Changed to 3.73 gears. Personally wished I would have kept the 3.55.

If you're running the stock 19 inch tire size, then your overall gearing will be about 4% shorter than the SVTPP setup with 20 inch wheels and 3.73's. That's a whole lot of torque multiplication! Time for some drag radials

.
Autobahn Shelby is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Thunderball
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
15
11-22-2015 11:49 PM
Bokeo
Street/Strip
6
10-10-2015 08:28 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
uedlose
The Racers Bench
4
10-01-2015 08:31 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM



Quick Reply: The SVT PP vs non-PP gear ratio misnomer



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:35 PM.