The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > 5.0 Mustang > Speed Density/Carb/SSP section
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-18-2009, 02:37 PM   #11
projectresto83
5th Gear Member
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 83 GLX, 93 LX, 98 sixer
Location: Indiana(Stationed in Texas)
Posts: 4,168
Default

This reminds me of the thread we had on exhaust sizes last year lol.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

Off building sand castles in the middle east
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 04:53 PM   #12
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Doev1 View Post
Ok I am thankfull for all the input but this is getting so far off topic that it is bypassing the original questions. I know that the carb more than likely needs the 50cc accelerator pump upgrade from Holly. I have the silver spring for the vaccume secondaries but the carb spits fuel at partial throttle. I dont fully understand how a 3 inch exhaust is the reason for my fuel problems with the carb.

Not being a smart ass guys or anything like that so please dont take it that way, but would rather stay on topic.
..... it falls within your topic and other details. Regarding your problem, you hit the nail on the head... it isn't a possible cause. What's the manifold vacuum engine idling?.... LUK
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 08:33 PM   #13
Portmaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1985 LX Coupe
Location: SC
Posts: 2,402
Default

See this is where the problem is Joel, I never said it was his problem refering to the OP's original question. I just remarked on his exhaust after reading his combo. You just love taking anything I say and tearing it apart. Maybe he dosent have 14 years to get his car dialed in , lol
Portmaster is offline  
Old 05-18-2009, 11:11 PM   #14
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmaster View Post
See this is where the problem is Joel, I never said it was his problem refering to the OP's original question. I just remarked on his exhaust after reading his combo. You just love taking anything I say and tearing it apart. Maybe he dosent have 14 years to get his car dialed in , lol
..... neither did I, or don't you see I simply stressed it based on John's observation when he wrote:

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Doev1
I dont fully understand how a 3 inch exhaust is the reason for my fuel problems with the carb.
I know it isn't a cause for the fuel problem with either exhaust ID, you know it...... but that was what John interpreted as the solution, or part of the solution to the fuel problem he's dealing with. Maybe after reading....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmaster View Post
Use a lighter spring on the secondary side. The carb should have come with a handful of springs. What is the fuel pressure? Check the accel pump arm to make sure it's set right.

You need to get that huge exhaust off. Your killing off the scavanging effect of the exhaust.
I simply confirmed it.... (John, feel free to correct me if I'm wrong BTW)..... and directly stated to him, it is NOT in the list of possible causes for that problem, so why waste money downgrading exhaust components.
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)

Last edited by Joel5.0; 05-18-2009 at 11:22 PM.
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:37 AM   #15
Portmaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1985 LX Coupe
Location: SC
Posts: 2,402
Default

Portmaster say, He who quotes his own quotes full of himself, lol

It's all about you baby, hahaha!!!
Portmaster is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:27 AM   #16
Joel5.0
5th Gear Member
 
Joel5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 1986 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 3,736
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmaster View Post
Portmaster say, He who quotes his own quotes full of himself, lol

It's all about you baby, hahaha!!!
LOL.... love it when a relevant answer to the topic is obviously an impossible task, and a diversion towards something, totally unrelated to the topic, is used to draw the attention over trivialities....

If that's your opinion hey, everybody has one, just like other stuff...... at least I take responsibility of what I post, and try not to mention items that will cause unnecessary and wasteful expenditures (directly or by interpretation of the OP) on modifications that will not solve anything.
__________________
ACRONYMS:
LUK=Let Us Know, GL=Good Luck, LMK=Let Me Know, JIC=Just In Case, BTSTDTRT=Been There Seen That Done That Repaired That, YCYDYP=Your Car Your Dough Your Prerogative and the classic... DILLIGAS=Do I Look Like I Give A S***

1986 GT-X303-289 heads-1.72 rockers-RG 4+1 Trans.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joel5.0
Great thoughts will overwhelm a feeble mind.
There is never money to do it right, but there's always money to do it over.
The proof of understanding is the ability to explain it. (H. Torruella)
Joel5.0 is offline  
Old 05-19-2009, 10:37 AM   #17
Portmaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1985 LX Coupe
Location: SC
Posts: 2,402
Default

Hahahahaha!!!! It's all about you baby!!!!!!
Portmaster is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 09:25 PM   #18
mjr46
Sheriff/Mr. Ballbreaker
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 23,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Portmaster View Post
Hahahahaha!!!! It's all about you baby!!!!!!
why not just answer his question and continue this enlightening debate.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudeboy View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 09:52 PM   #19
Portmaster
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 1985 LX Coupe
Location: SC
Posts: 2,402
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjr46 View Post
why not just answer his question and continue this enlightening debate.
He posed no relevant question. I simply commented that the OP's exhaust was too large running E7 heads AFTER I gave him a suggestion to solve his problem.
If you are condoning argument for the sake of keeping the thread alive feel free to throw in your opinion as to the OP's original question. I just don't buy into Joel's techno babble BS.
Portmaster is offline  
Old 05-21-2009, 10:20 PM   #20
mjr46
Sheriff/Mr. Ballbreaker
 
mjr46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 85 mustang
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 23,240
Default

I think I need to edit the word argument to discussion in your post.........as for entering the debate, I'd keep the exhaust he has on there.....why?? cause one he gets a h/c/i that'll utilize the 3 inch to the fullest extent he'll be glad he's not having to buy exhaust all over again.....we all know we constantly change out combos in the quest for more power, so why not keep parts that'll support a bigger and better combo. I could of saved a lot of money early on had I done such
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by dudeboy View Post
Be polite and cordial when you talk to them, as pissing off the guys that can help you is seldom a good idea.
mjr46 is offline  



Closed Thread



Tags
289, 302, accelerator, carb, cluster, dyno, ford, fuel, girdle, holley, holly, joe, secondary, sherman, spitting, stock, tests, vaccume, valley

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:45 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company