The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-07-2007, 06:15 PM   #121
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,067
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default RE: LS1

Not to diss the 3V GT's..........owning one myself[8D].............but I still have a hard time with the 300hp GT being a driver's race for the 345-350ish hp LS1. I never raced a stock one when I was stock, so I have no first hand experience.......it just seems weird. I know a bad enough driver can handicap the hp advantage of his car pretty badly.....but damn. Its not like there's a big weight difference (that I know of).

I do know that the new GT's put their power down pretty effectively even on stock suspension (or mildy modded suspension).....but they struggle once u start going FI. Hence the reason I want to overhaul my suspension. Car feels entirely too "squishy" now that I'm 160hp over stock.[:'(]

I'm actually trying to find someone with a stock or mostly stock LS1 F-body to buddy up with so I can get a ride (or possibly a drive) in one. I'm curious as to how different the powerband feels compared to my car. So far, no luck. I've met and talked to a few owners on chance meetings and such......but the only guys I know are the two dorks I work with, and they both have gone into the motor for mods......ie: not close to stock.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2007, 10:59 PM   #122
lovescamaros25
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 78
Default RE: LS1

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.
__________________
The Camaro is coming back
lovescamaros25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 01:12 AM   #123
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,067
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default RE: LS1

Quote:
ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.
Yay, your post count goes up by one...................here's a cookie.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 07:35 PM   #124
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
2002 Chevrolet Camaro
 
TommyV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Posts: 4,352
Default RE: LS1

Quote:
ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.
Which 4.6? Not the blown version, that's for sure.
__________________
2002 Camaro Z28 Mulletmobile
Automatic, 3.42 gears, stock converter
Airbox lid, full exhaust, drag radials
12.76 @ 109.76, 1.92 60 ft
TommyV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2007, 07:42 PM   #125
TommyV8
5th Gear Member
2002 Chevrolet Camaro
 
TommyV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Vehicle: 2002 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Location: St. Charles, Missouri
Posts: 4,352
Default RE: LS1

Quote:
ORIGINAL: ThisBlood147

I'm actually trying to find someone with a stock or mostly stock LS1 F-body to buddy up with so I can get a ride (or possibly a drive) in one. I'm curious as to how different the powerband feels compared to my car. So far, no luck. I've met and talked to a few owners on chance meetings and such......but the only guys I know are the two dorks I work with, and they both have gone into the motor for mods......ie: not close to stock.
Mine is fairly close, I just have the lid and the headers. I can swap the lidfor the stockerand keeping the cap on the cutout with the stock muffler pretty much negates the headers. Hell,I haven't even had it tuned for the headers soit might actually be slower than stock. But you live really far from me.
__________________
2002 Camaro Z28 Mulletmobile
Automatic, 3.42 gears, stock converter
Airbox lid, full exhaust, drag radials
12.76 @ 109.76, 1.92 60 ft
TommyV8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2007, 02:28 AM   #126
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
2005 Ford Mustang
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang GT
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,067
Send a message via Yahoo to ThisBlood147
Default RE: LS1

Yea, I think your car would fit the bill nicely Tommy. If only I had a good excuse (and the vacation time) to take a run up your way sometime.[&o]

P.S. Get a tune on that thing man. Poor Z[8D]
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanielleAnne
So technically the power to money ratio is still much better with the Camaro...
I don't think they correct times at the 1320 for that......
ThisBlood147 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 12:12 AM   #127
05MidBlueGT
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 290
Default RE: LS1

9 Year Old LS1 is still faster then current GT. We can, but numbers don't lie...
05MidBlueGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-18-2007, 10:39 PM   #128
stanger99
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 320
Default RE: LS1

Quote:
ORIGINAL: TommyV8

Quote:
ORIGINAL: lovescamaros25

There is no question the LS1 is a better engine than the 4.6 IMO.
Which 4.6? Not the blown version, that's for sure.
I have to argue yes the "blown4.6" is better for modding for crazy hp. But the engine itself is not better. Anybody can throw in some forged parts or what have you. Take the 01 cobra 32v and then compare it to the 01 SS LS1. If you start comparing the ls1 to the terminator you arespeaking ofa topic that has been beat to death. A built LS1 vs a built 32v.... 281 vs 346 I don't about you but I know which one I am taking.
__________________

03' Terminator - Steeda tri-ax, bassani catback, densecharger, 3.0 pulley, nitto drag radials 18 x 335's, sct x-cal 3. 445rwhp/445rwtq


99 black gt vert:gone
06 GTO - Cammed/stalled, 408 rwhp.
stanger99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 01:45 AM   #129
J E T
1st Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 89
Send a message via AIM to J E T
Default RE: LS1

Quote:
ORIGINAL: 05MidBlueGT

9 Year Old LS1 is still faster then current GT. We can, but numbers don't lie...
11 year old LS1.
__________________
Current:
1998 S10 4x4

Sold:
2000 Camaro Z28

Future projects:
1994/1995 5.0 Mustang M5 - H/C/I/E Supercharged
1996/1997 LT1 Camaro A4 - H/C/I/E Turbo
2001/2002 LS1 Firebird M6 - H/C/I/E Nitrous
J E T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2007, 07:55 PM   #130
white07
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,583
Default RE: LS1

Im not going to make this seem like a big argument but come on 281 ci vs 346ci? How does a 347 stack up to a 346 b/c i know a guy who runs low 11s with a 347 and its a DD. As far as a semi stock 00 Trans Am vs. a stock 07 GT I got beat by about 2 cars length from a dig and a roll, but the problem was I launched at 2K rpms which after going to the track I have found out that I gain at least .3 seconds by launching at 4K rpms so if I would of known that then it would have been a little closer eh? Also my buddy in his 03 cobra STOCK ran a SS with full exhaust, cam, gears, and I believe intake and heads and walked him hard.
When i went to the track a t/a with a cam was running 13.3s and a SS making a sh!t load of noise was running 12.8s.

All im saying is that the driver makes a BIG diffrence.
__________________

12.71 @ 99.40mph
white07 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
2800, cam, camaro, carburetor, cutout, exhaust, fbodies, fbody, gen, ls1, ls2, memphis, rattiling, stall, stock, underrated

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company