95 Thunderbird with 4.6 - MustangForums.com

Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip

Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.
Sponsored by Roush Performance

95 Thunderbird with 4.6

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-29-2007, 03:45 AM   #1
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Clarksville TN
Posts: 6,828
Default 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

Some of you may have read and remember the thread I made the other night about the 91 Camaro RS and the lady I work with who thinks its fast. Well last night we got on the subject about cars again and she said her Dad had a 95 Thunderbird with a v8 and she said it was fast, and faster than her Camaro. She's like man that thing flies. Seriously again, I was LOL, but not out loud. She said they raced awhile back and by the way she was talking her Dad won. The 95 Thunderbirds with the 4.6 were what, mid to high 15 second cars at best? On a lighter, but good note, she said her parents just bought an 07 Camry with the v6, I so wanted to bust out and tell her the Camry would whoop both cars, LOL.
2013 Ford Mustang Boss 302 - Bone Stock
2014 Ford Taurus SEL - Fully Loaded
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1
1BAD3V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 10:36 AM   #2
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2009 Corvette Z06
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,355
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

Its sad how the 4 door sedans are slowly becoming as fast as our cars [&o]
2009 CBR600RR | 2009 C6Z06
Sarge_13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 10:44 AM   #3
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 05 Mustang
Location: Rome,GA
Posts: 2,286
Send a message via AIM to Dwisforme05
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

the 95's arnt fast. they are quick, not amazingly quick, but quick. that is if its the supercoupe. the regular ones are.........well lets just say they arnt the best cars. looks and performance wise.
'05 4.0 ( auto) red fire

Blown By Vortech

http://www.cameronflaischphotography.com my Photography site
Dwisforme05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 11:10 AM   #4
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

Yeah, the 95's with the 4.6's are slowwwwww. I know a kid that had one with full bolt-ons and a "chip", which probably didn't do anyting for it. But he raced my other friend with a '96 Cavalier Z24 that was stock and still didn't beat it until the Z24 shut off at 107. Then the T-bird got by it since the governor was removed from the chip. Supposedly it'd do 152mph, the guy said. I highly doubt it though, from the lack of power and aerodynamics.
97 Cobra - BBK lontubes
Gone But Not Forgotten
98 Trans Am - 6.0 LQ4, L92 heads, LS3 intake, TSP 231/236 cam, and boltons
94 Z28 - full bolton and 3.90's
tspence45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:27 PM   #5
ripped camel
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 03 Ford Mustang GT vert
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,721
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

I watched multiple mid 90's tbirds pulling mid 14's at Moroso in FL on the same night
03 GT vert 5spd - 261RWHP, 301 RWTQ
57 Chevy bel air- Car Craft cover car, SOLD!
ripped camel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 12:52 PM   #6
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Vehicle: 2012 3.7
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 1,898
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

As far as the v8 models, they're pretty much [:'(]. But if any stockish foxbody or sn95 npi would be in trouble with a s/c v6 tbird, or the s/c v6 cougar. The t/c 4cyl werent too shabby really either.

Buddy of mine is in the process of doing the s/c swap on his 98 v6 stang. He's getting the eaton from my little brothers deceased s/c cougar. Should be very interesting what the outcome will be. s/c + his new 3.73's, I might be in trouble myself [:@]
2012- 3.7l v6, M6
BBK Lt/BBK offroad-x/custom 2.5in catback/GT resonators/MAC Flowpaths/FRPP 3.73s/JLT cai/Ported Throttle Body/Bama 93R/J&M lca/Steeda Tri-ax/15in Racestars/26-10.5-15 MT ET Street/STOCK driveshaft

12.71 @ 109.5 1.74 60ft.... 31.2mpg
97tplsGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 03:44 PM   #7
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

The thunderbirds are not that bad for what they are, but race cars they are not.
1996 eclipse in progress.
best 14.6 1/4.
Ls-1 z-28
LS6 heads, exhaust, cam, 4.10 w/stall, wet shot, some other stuff along with a completely gutted interior.
[Salvage vehicle from a flood]
waffenss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 04:25 PM   #8
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 132
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

I would say that a stock one from 95 is a low 16 second car maybe high 15. Not very fast at all.

04 GT K&N,Flowmaster 40's
dru04gt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 10:12 PM   #9
4th Gear Member
Jfsram's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 93 Mustang LX
Posts: 1,999
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

Had a 95 with a Trac Lok and smaller than stock tires. This gave it a decent stab at the 60'. It ran a 15.5@88mph. Claims of high 15's are the norm though, as most spin a bit off the line an that nets a high 15 for those.

Super coupes are bottom 15's and easily modded to run faster. As for the Turbo coupes being a threat. No, not to a 4.6L Tbird.

I hear ya on the Camry. Pretty sad that the power of those cars will often go unappreciated.
65 Belevedere
69 Super Bee
87 Ram
93 Mustang
00 Park Avenue

Jfsram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2007, 10:23 PM   #10
5th Gear Member
94Blk5.0's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 1994 GT
Location: NC
Posts: 2,107
Default RE: 95 Thunderbird with 4.6

V8 T-Birds were pretty quick for a mid-90's personal luxury crusier. The interiors on those look really good and comeplenty options that belong on a Lincoln. There aren't many comparalbe cars ( 2 dr., RWD criusers) besides the Mark VIII ( 32v 4.6).
Remember "fast" is very subjective, and a V8 T-Bird is probably quicker than a lot of things on the road, or at least feels quicker due to the TQ.
I'd rather have a 95 S/C with a 5spd., though.[8D]
They are pretty responsive to mods; a CAI, MAF, thorttle body, exhaust work, smaller pulley, and a dyno tune on a 95 ( 230 HP/335ish TQ,stock)would be a sweet ride/sleeper.Come to think of it, that Bird would fly. [sm=icon_rofl.gif]
1994 GT - 302 - T5 - 9.2 @ 77.4

1996 F150 - 351 - E4OD - 4X4

2007 Crown Vic P71 - 281 - 4R75W
94Blk5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Owning a 2005 to 2009 Mustang GT mdj89 2005-2014 Mustangs 20 10-26-2015 12:53 PM
4.6 Reasons the Modular V8 Is an Underrated Engine MustangForums Editor 4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang 3 10-09-2015 04:27 PM
whats needed to swap a 4.6L into ratrod rksnow1 Motor Swap Section 0 09-14-2015 09:46 PM
1077hp / 909 ft lbs torque 4V 4.6 motor angeljoelv SVT Forums 0 09-10-2015 10:12 PM
The Future of my GT vintageaion 2005-2014 Mustangs 2 09-08-2015 11:45 AM

46, 90s, 95, bird, bolt, cardomain, fast, governor, mustang, ons, performance, pics, tbirds, thunderbird, work, xpipe

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. FordŽ is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company