The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-28-2008, 12:21 PM   #11
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 03 Mach 1
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6,651
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Force4

Honestly this sounds like BS. a c4 trans with 2:80 gears on a 302 smoking a 400c.i ???? wtf I no the 400 only put like 250hp and 350fpt but that should easily walk an older 302.
clearly this is true for a stock 302, but his is built, so until i know the mods on the 302 im giving him the benefit of a doubt.

SO OP what is done to the 302?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 12:27 PM   #12
Quick Shot xMLx
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Vehicle: 00 Chev Corvette
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,153
Send a message via AIM to Quick Shot xMLx
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

Quote:
ORIGINAL: USMCrebel

Quote:
ORIGINAL: Force4

Honestly this sounds like BS. a c4 trans with 2:80 gears on a 302 smoking a 400c.i ???? wtf I no the 400 only put like 250hp and 350fpt but that should easily walk an older 302.
clearly this is true for a stock 302, but his is built, so until i know the mods on the 302 im giving him the benefit of a doubt.

SO OP what is done to the 302?
All the bolts were used when putting it back together. Sorry just a joke I used to say about a friend's "built D series."
__________________
02 GT: NX 125 shot, O/R H, SLP LM1s, 4.10s, BFG DRs....sold
00 C5: NX 150 shot, LG Streets, Corsa X, Z06 Ti's
Quick Shot xMLx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:15 PM   #13
94Thunderbirdpunk
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 223
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

So why isn't anyone here bi%ching about this? What I see is some 18 year old kid driving around a vintage muscle car like an idiot.

I won't call B.S. on his story because the old 68-70 302 blocks were much more stout than any of the newer ones and therefore can handle much more power. So it's possible that this motor is pushing some power.. andI'll admit thatthe Pontiac 400 was a decent motor in it's time, but it certainly wasn't unbeatable on the streets.
94Thunderbirdpunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 01:17 PM   #14
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 03 Mach 1
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6,651
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

as long as they did it where no one was, and possible damage done is minimized to the drivers then i see Nothing wrong with it.
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:31 PM   #15
sethalot
1st Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sethalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 127
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

i would like to say though the pontiac has its original motor and its on its last leg, and mine only has 5,000 miles on it and the tranny is fresh as well, though i know im not pushing anywhere near 500 ponies, probably more along the lines of 300-350 idk i'll let you know after i get a chance to dyno it, and as for being young i am a fairly competent driver as well as rider i teach the motorcycle classes out here at mcc and i hate the fact that my car is and auto but i only paid $7700 for the car as it is now so i got a fairly good deal on it, also as the car is not original in anyway aside from the body im not to worried about it depreciating that way and have no plans on getting rid of the car
__________________
'69 mustang coupe 302cid
'97 ranger 4.0L 4X4 for playing in the mud
'91 suzuki katana 1100- sold looking for replacement
'87 mitsubishi starion 2.6L turbo
sethalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:35 PM   #16
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 03 Mach 1
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6,651
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

again, what is done to the 302?
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:45 PM   #17
sethalot
1st Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sethalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 127
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

i honestly dont know everything the guy i bought it from gives me somthing along the lines of half answers as far as i have gotten out of him, flat top pistons, he did somthing to the heads, no word on the cam, 650cfm holley 4bbl carb, edelbrock 289 performer intake, no idea on the bottom end, shift kit in the tranny it scratches first to second and second to third, stock 8 inch rear end, it has crappy stock exhaust manifolds and tiny ass exhaust but as soon as i get some money those are gone and im thinking 3.55's for the rear
__________________
'69 mustang coupe 302cid
'97 ranger 4.0L 4X4 for playing in the mud
'91 suzuki katana 1100- sold looking for replacement
'87 mitsubishi starion 2.6L turbo
sethalot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 03:49 PM   #18
USMCrebel
Mach I Section Moderator
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Vehicle: 03 Mach 1
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 6,651
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

yeah i think your going to be right around 300-325hp....whats the dudes number i'll call his ass and ask him for specifics
__________________
2003 Ox Wht Mach 1 1:814
bone stock
Her name is Melanie
USMCrebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:07 PM   #19
Force4
3rd Gear Member
 
Force4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 601
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

that was the worst bunch of gargle i have ever heard in my life LOL
__________________

1983 mustang GT 5spd 357w
2005 Dodge ram 1500
2005 Sabercat 700 EFI
1996 probe gt 5-spd
Force4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2008, 04:12 PM   #20
sethalot
1st Gear Member
1969 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
sethalot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location:
Posts: 127
Default RE: prom night, '69 mustang vs '70 firebird

lol but yeah thats all i know right now, i need to get some wider tires for the front to it doesnt like turning all that much right now its got 245's out back and 195's in the front but regardless its a good place to start from
__________________
'69 mustang coupe 302cid
'97 ranger 4.0L 4X4 for playing in the mud
'91 suzuki katana 1100- sold looking for replacement
'87 mitsubishi starion 2.6L turbo
sethalot is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
69, carb, firebird

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:10 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company