Stock 1/4 mile and 0-60 times
10-29-2008, 07:01 PM
#13
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: VA
Posts: 2,374
^
Looking at my car.
OP has posted in the thread
"2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 6.1 14.6 (C&D Sept '05)"
the actual link has this.
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged, 6.1 14.4 (MT Dec '05)
Yeah, alot of the times are slower than a decent driver that's actually use to the car can pull.
Looking at my car.
OP has posted in the thread
"2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS 6.1 14.6 (C&D Sept '05)"
the actual link has this.
2005 Chevrolet Cobalt SS Supercharged, 6.1 14.4 (MT Dec '05)
Yeah, alot of the times are slower than a decent driver that's actually use to the car can pull.
10-29-2008, 08:02 PM
#14
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.8 14.4
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Conv. 6.2 14.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 13.8
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6
LMFAO!!!
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Conv. 6.2 14.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 13.8
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6
LMFAO!!!
10-29-2008, 09:41 PM
#15
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Bethesda MD
Posts: 2,035
1993 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.8 14.4
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Conv. 6.2 14.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 13.8
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6
LMFAO!!!
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1994 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 Conv. 6.2 14.5
1995 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.2
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.7 14.1
1996 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.3 13.8
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 5.2 13.7
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS 5.2 13.6
LMFAO!!!
We should edit the list and make it more accurate. I thought it was good for a rough idea on cars i had never even thought to look. And it was a 10 second copy and paste.
Last edited by HornyHornyHippo; 10-29-2008 at 09:43 PM.
10-29-2008, 11:05 PM
#17
4th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,879
lol. Before I knew better, I used to go by what that site said all the time. I laugh at my stupidity now. It's all a bunch of BS times that supposedly expert drivers pulled off. I want to see the whole time slip for every car on the list. I bet you'd see a lot of 60' times in the 2.2+ area. The 14.8 for an '04 GT is laughable.
10-30-2008, 08:19 AM
#20
Mach I Section Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: round abouts these parts
Posts: 7,140