The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2008, 02:24 PM   #11
cacimar
5th Gear Member
 
cacimar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: delray beach, florida
Posts: 2,690
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drhoward View Post
they're not that light 3200-3300 pounds, and the one in the article he was refering to is a sti not a wrx. They are quick no doubt about it but still not as fast as a s197

Re-read the whole article again, it clearly states that it edges the WRX STI not by much though


And when we say "plenty," we mean it: the revised WRX now blasts to 60 mph from a standstill in an electrifying 4.7 seconds. That's 1.1 seconds quicker than the 2008 model—and get this—0.3 second quicker than we've managed in a WRX STI, the supposedly higher-performance version of the WRX. The fact that the WRX is now substantially quicker seems absolutely bonkers, but there are a couple of good explanations. First, the WRX STI weighs a hearty 180 pounds more than the base WRX, according to our scales. Second, the STI and its closer-ratio six-speed manual call for two shifts to 60, while the regular WRX's five speed hits 60 mph in second gear. By the time the pair travel a quarter-mile, the '09 WRX loses some ground, though; both cross the line at 102 mph, with the base Rex edging out the STI by just 0.1 second, 13.5 to 13.6.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
04 SRT: 50 trim + supporting mods running only 20 PSI
cacimar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 02:50 PM   #12
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert 1 of 1001
Location: Pacific Beach, San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Riptide View Post
READ THE CAR AND DRIVER LINK.

Yes, the 09 WRX will keep up with an s197. In the 1/4. And on the street from a dig the advantage goes handily to the WRX. It's 0-60 is clearly a step up over the s197.

Read the links people.
Well use your brain. It's owning it from a dig just as the last gen. rex did. It's down on horsepower to the GT by a good margin. Look at the trap speed, a Mustang GT is faster. Just be wary of racing one from a dig but eventually you will run him down and from a roll you got him.
__________________


For Sale:
17" x 8" Authentic Cobra R's

1983 Mustang GT Convertible 1 of 1001 '83 GT Vert's <-New Pics
2006 Mazda 3s Hatch
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 02:50 PM   #13
drhoward
5th Gear Member
1994 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
drhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang Super Special Hooker Edition GT
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 3,108
Default

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...val/index.html

This was the original article that was posted, I didn't realise the new ones were that much faster

How did they manage a 13.5 out of 260 hp wrx and a 13.5 out of a 305 hp sti?
__________________
1994 Mustang GT
My Porsche makes me better than you
www.cardomain.com/id/bigshirtlesspete

Quote:
ORIGINAL: redass02gt
the 2 guys would have to be related or I wouldn't swallow their semen.
drhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 03:27 PM   #14
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
2004 Dodge SRT-4
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 2004 Stage 3 SRT-4
Location: usally a state of confusion. But I live in jersey
Posts: 6,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by drhoward View Post
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...val/index.html

This was the original article that was posted, I didn't realise the new ones were that much faster

How did they manage a 13.5 out of 260 hp wrx and a 13.5 out of a 305 hp sti?
I haven't read the article yet but that sounds like a glory pass to me. I think your alot more likely to see high 13s out of a wrx. Which makes it a good race for the average GT driver. But I'd still have to put my money on the GT if I was a betting man.
__________________
11.79@118.53
BEST 60=1.68
BEST TRAP SPEED=120.60

I've never actually raced but according to my dyno numbers. I should run 8s on street tires.



bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 03:35 PM   #15
drhoward
5th Gear Member
1994 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
drhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang Super Special Hooker Edition GT
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 3,108
Default

well I know the sti's are faster than mid 13's in the hands of a decent driver, so I guess thats part of it

But 13.5 with a 3300lb 265 hp car is amazing
__________________
1994 Mustang GT
My Porsche makes me better than you
www.cardomain.com/id/bigshirtlesspete

Quote:
ORIGINAL: redass02gt
the 2 guys would have to be related or I wouldn't swallow their semen.
drhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 03:47 PM   #16
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,114
Default

I think the STI has a six speed and the WRX will hit sixty in 2nd gear.

And the older WRX usually tested mid 5s for 0-60. Maybe it still bested the s197 from a dig but I think it was a lot closer than it will be with this new one.
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 04:36 PM   #17
TRBOPWR
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 1985 SVOx2, 1986 SVO
Location: Wooster/Bucyrus OH
Posts: 1,087
Default

It does make you wonder how they will step up the STi to far out-match the regular WRX though doesn't it?
__________________


Sig courtesy of Tombohum

1985 SVO 13.62 @ ~97mph with 1.74 60' and 20 psi, on the brakes trying to keep from breaking out!
TRBOPWR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 04:39 PM   #18
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member
1995 Ford Mustang
 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 95 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,598
Default

I raced one at my local 1/8th mile last week. The best he ran was a 9.0@78mph. Obviously, there was some driver error. Although I still think I could have easily beaten him if he was a great driver.
__________________
95 Mustang GT
TrickFlow H/C/I + AODE + Vortech SQ@16psi + Tweecer Tuned by Fritz Kloss
New Dyno #'s: 396rwhp/431rwtq(ran out of fuel)
New ET: 7.57@91 (1.84 60ft)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=el5XYPGj4sM&feature
DD: 95 Mustang GTS- 5 spd; 306ci, Magnaflow X, Summit headers, Pypes Cat-back, K&N, MGW shifter
New ET: 9.7@72(2.34 60ft)
NoGo95GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:06 PM   #19
drhoward
5th Gear Member
1994 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
drhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang Super Special Hooker Edition GT
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 3,108
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRBOPWR View Post
It does make you wonder how they will step up the STi to far out-match the regular WRX though doesn't it?

I know, thats like if ford came out with a new v6 mustang that was faster than the gt model
__________________
1994 Mustang GT
My Porsche makes me better than you
www.cardomain.com/id/bigshirtlesspete

Quote:
ORIGINAL: redass02gt
the 2 guys would have to be related or I wouldn't swallow their semen.
drhoward is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2008, 05:09 PM   #20
Riptide
5th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GT
Location: Montaner
Posts: 4,114
Default

The new WRX makes me feel SLOW.
__________________
2006 GT, Manual
JLT2 w/91 Tune
FRPP 4.10, Steeda LCA
MAC Boomtubes
Goodyear 255/45/18, 285/40/18
Riptide is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
060, 09, 14, 18th, 2008, 2009, availability, launch, mile, northeast, quarter, race, time, times, wrx

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:04 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company