You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Location: usally a state of confusion. But I live in jersey
Posts: 6,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by jakeachy
guys, how can you be this ignorant?
crankwalk was not very common, and it only happened to 95/96.
They get their bad name and rep from their white trash drivers... no maintenance, just beat on it all day.
You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster.
Really???
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
11.79@118.53
BEST 60=1.68
BEST TRAP SPEED=120.60
I've never actually raced but according to my dyno numbers. I should run 8s on street tires.
Last edited by bluebeastsrt; 11-15-2008 at 06:37 AM.
guys, how can you be this ignorant?crankwalk was not very common, and it only happened to 95/96.
They get their bad name and rep from their white trash drivers... no maintenance, just beat on it all day.
You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster. Cheap for fast, but they are seriously junky cars.
Yes, how can you be this ignorant? You are saying that 2k will not only catch you up 1.5-2 seconds in the quarter mile, but also put it out of reach of a modded F-body/Evo? I have alot of respect for the cars (my sister and dad are putting one together for her), but not that much.
__________________
Sig courtesy of Tombohum
1985 SVO 13.62 @ ~97mph with 1.74 60' and 20 psi, on the brakes trying to keep from breaking out!
Fun cars and very quick! I had a big 16G ported and clipped with downpipe and stock exhaust boosting 18psi with fuel upgrades. Car was a 95 Talon TSI and I walked a lot of Camaros and Stangs. Never had any problems and beat the **** out of it. Have heard a lot of negatives about them but none on my end. Very fun cars but they build horsepower unlike my torque monster Ford!
__________________
Vortech Powered and DID Tuned 386 rwhp w/ 402 Ft/lbs Torque
You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster. Cheap for fast, but they are seriously junky cars.
LMAO, get off the friggen bandwagon dude. 2k can get you a home made turbo kit for an F-body and supporting mods too and you'll be running low 11's with traction, or you could get a head/cam package and get the same times as the turbo setup. my friend is building a 93 Eclipse GSX and he's just barely pushing mid 13's. he's spent $2500 on building the car.
dude, i'm just laughing my ass off at your complete friggen ignorance right now
guys, how can you be this ignorant?
crankwalk was not very common, and it only happened to 95/96.
They get their bad name and rep from their white trash drivers... no maintenance, just beat on it all day.
You put 2k into a stock awd dsm, and then put 2k into a fox, evo, wrx,f body,etc and the dsm will always be faster. Cheap for fast, but they are seriously junky cars.
wasn't sure what happened but it went out of commission for about a month or two.... I just met the kid again and he is now ruinning an aftermarket turbo with a larger front mount and a proper dyno tune
we raced with his new setup from a stop and I drove my GTO.... we took it up to 120MPH and I won by 3 cars with a CAI+tune combo
go figure...
__________________
Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 11-15-2008 at 02:45 PM.
I have seen a lot of fast ones at the track here. It seems like they have a lot of problems when they are racing. Maybe that is just how they are treated, 2/3 times I go to the track there is a DSM that blows something up.
well I think if their owners weren't such tools most of the time, they probably wouldn't get such a bad reputation.
Like I said, the one I was driving to the other day, completely white, nothing that said talon on it, I just knew it was a DSM talon, but he kept speeding up, with his music blasting, subwoofer's booming, typical rice rocket driver.
The other one, is actually grean, and on the rear tailights, centered it says "turbo", and that's about the most agressive thing on it, and even the guy who owns it, (fifty something) drives like a retard, speeds everywhere, and usually spends alot of his time in boost.
What type of rotating assemblies do they have stock? I would assume forged, but I could be wrong, which might be why some take a crap at 70,000miles or so, but also, after surfing the DSM website, it looks as if there are many of them trying to make their cars as fast as they can spending as little as physically possible. maybe if they used expensive parts, or at the very least, not the cheapest parts available, they would last a little longer.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdot9
i could go for a nice can of cock rite now actually...
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
my friend is building a 93 Eclipse GSX and he's just barely pushing mid 13's. he's spent $2500 on building the car.
