The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-31-2009, 05:24 PM   #11
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 7,814
Send a message via AIM to 98LS1
Default

If he hooks, he beats you either way. His car is just more powerful and lighter. Weird saying that about a car that came on the scene in '91 I believe.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
2000 FRC M6
Heads/Cam/75 shot/Stock intake/Ported stock TB
3.90 gear
10.7 @ 130 mph
6.8 @ 104 mph

1998 TransAm SOLD!
Cam only, 8.8" rear, 4.10's
500rwhp/496rwtq
Dry kit/stock fuel system

Idle Video



˙ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ uı pǝʇsǝɹǝʇuı ʎllɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
98LS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 05:57 PM   #12
k0261886
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan
Posts: 174
Default

From a dig it would have been even worse. IMO, you should have beat him from a 40mph roll. LT1 engines are awesome from a dig if you can launch them, I have beat a few Ls1 cars to 50mph. After that they kinda run out of steam though, there isn't much of a point spinning an LT1 past 5k rpm, they just don't make much power up top. The
__________________

^^Slow
k0261886 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 06:38 PM   #13
Stone629
5th Gear Member
2009 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2009, Ford, GT/CS
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,740
Default

I don't think he should've lost either way, dig or roll. JMO, but the results posted are results I would've expected from a automatic LS1 C5, not an LT1 Vette.
__________________
2009 GT/CS, Vapor Silver, Manual '
308.4 RWHP/317.4 RWTQ
13.18 at 107 mph (2.0 60')...(1,243' DA, 75 degrees)
8.58 1/8th at 85 mph

2003 Mach 1, DSG, Manual
O/RX, Flowmaster Cat-back, weld-in subframes, KN Filter
13.1 at 107.97 Mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubTexel View Post
And when I win, I club a baby seal in front of the loser to let him know that it's his fault the baby seal died because he lost.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 08:51 PM   #14
iluvmycar
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Mustang GT
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,390
Default

So, either this guy probably was not stock, or he got the slight early jump more or likely?

*edit* wow... some mixed opinions here with it being stock.
Some saying I would have lost either way, some saying I should have won.
__________________

2006 GT Premium, 5 Spd
SLP Crew Member
Some Mods done, More Mods Coming!

Last edited by iluvmycar; 05-31-2009 at 08:54 PM.
iluvmycar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 08:58 PM   #15
Stone629
5th Gear Member
2009 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2009, Ford, GT/CS
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,740
Default

I think he had a little something. Could've been simply an intake and or tune. I'm not trying to say that they're slow or anything because they're not by any means, but IMO an S197 should be able to handle one 90% of the time. Fwiw, he may have been totally stock and just have a really good running LT1, and got a slight jump. Getting the jump can add a car real quick when roll racing.
__________________
2009 GT/CS, Vapor Silver, Manual '
308.4 RWHP/317.4 RWTQ
13.18 at 107 mph (2.0 60')...(1,243' DA, 75 degrees)
8.58 1/8th at 85 mph

2003 Mach 1, DSG, Manual
O/RX, Flowmaster Cat-back, weld-in subframes, KN Filter
13.1 at 107.97 Mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubTexel View Post
And when I win, I club a baby seal in front of the loser to let him know that it's his fault the baby seal died because he lost.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 09:09 PM   #16
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 7,814
Send a message via AIM to 98LS1
Default

LT1 cars make more power and weigh less with a better power curve.....this is why I have a hard time believing all these kill stories on LS1 cars from "stock" S197's.
__________________
2000 FRC M6
Heads/Cam/75 shot/Stock intake/Ported stock TB
3.90 gear
10.7 @ 130 mph
6.8 @ 104 mph

1998 TransAm SOLD!
Cam only, 8.8" rear, 4.10's
500rwhp/496rwtq
Dry kit/stock fuel system

Idle Video



˙ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ uı pǝʇsǝɹǝʇuı ʎllɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
98LS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 09:16 PM   #17
Stone629
5th Gear Member
2009 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2009, Ford, GT/CS
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,740
Default

I thought most LT1s made 275 BHP and 320 TQ? S197s make 300/320 (allegedly underrated from 320 bhp). The LT1 has a nice low end torque curve, but all that falls off up top. LS1s are in a completely different league than the LT1 imo. As far as S197s abusing LS1s, it happens, but it probably shouldn't half the time, not with a stock S197 anyway.
__________________
2009 GT/CS, Vapor Silver, Manual '
308.4 RWHP/317.4 RWTQ
13.18 at 107 mph (2.0 60')...(1,243' DA, 75 degrees)
8.58 1/8th at 85 mph

2003 Mach 1, DSG, Manual
O/RX, Flowmaster Cat-back, weld-in subframes, KN Filter
13.1 at 107.97 Mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubTexel View Post
And when I win, I club a baby seal in front of the loser to let him know that it's his fault the baby seal died because he lost.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 09:48 PM   #18
67mustang302
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Vehicle: 67 Mustang Coupe
Location: California
Posts: 7,341
Default

I think the Vette could have gone either way. If it was stock, or close to stock then there's enough wiggle room for both cars for it to come down to driving, getting the jump etc. The Camaro would have beat you either way on the top side. The S197's have good tranny gearing in 1st and 2nd, which makes up for the power deficit, but after that it's an LS1's game.

Street racing is always REALLY hard to judge outcome, you have no time slip. Someone can beat you by 5-10 cars, but if they jumped big may still be slower. I could take my car, go run a 13.5 and beat a Top Fuel car by 20 buslengths if he sits at the tree for 15 forevers. I'd still run 13.5 and he'd still run 4.5. I'm exaggerating, but I think you get my point. As far as I'm concerned on the street, anything that's within a few cars either way really needs to be on the strip to know for sure.
__________________
Who cares how much horsepower it has, all that matters is how fast it goes!

13.20's with 2.25-2.30 60's, 40+ year old suspension sucks!
Best trap 107.11mph, we'll see what the new intake/carb setup does.
12.80 at 110.5mph NHRA DA corrected
67mustang302 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2009, 11:08 PM   #19
S8ER01Z
5th Gear Member
2001 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 2001 Camaro Z28
Location: IL
Posts: 3,766
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
I thought most LT1s made 275 BHP and 320 TQ? S197s make 300/320 (allegedly underrated from 320 bhp). The LT1 has a nice low end torque curve, but all that falls off up top. LS1s are in a completely different league than the LT1 imo. As far as S197s abusing LS1s, it happens, but it probably shouldn't half the time, not with a stock S197 anyway.
You have been duped by GMs marketing team... the LT1 made 275/285hp in the F-Body. When put in the Corvette the LT1 magically makes 300hp / 340 trq (rated).
http://vette.automotive.com/59164/ve...dup/index.html
Quote:
Baseline
Accustomed as we are to 600-, 800-, and even 1,000hp C5s and C6s, we were primed for disappointment when Anti-Venom proprietor Greg Lovell strapped our virgin '96 to the shop's Dynojet chassis dyno for its first pull. We were pleasantly surprised, then, when the car registered a respectable 263.3 horses and 291.5 lb-ft of torque at the rear wheels
The numbers 98ls1 posted are about spot on ...250~255rwhp for an auto and 255~260rwhp manual (with some freak reports above that)... not exactly a weak setup. They really pale off the line compared to an S197 car though so giving up the dig was a bad bad thing. I think you would have taken the LT1 from a dig... but giving up your advantage was a big mistake IMHO.

The ls1 car is interesting but I would have to chalk it up to driver error... my LS1 car is 1 full second quicker and 10mph faster than either of my previous 2 LT1 cars.
__________________
2001 Z28 M6 - 13.1 @ 108mph 2.1 60ft / Bone Stock
3600lbs Race / 3440lbs Curb - 322rwhp/341rwtrq (1LE Springs/FRA/LID)

Last edited by S8ER01Z; 05-31-2009 at 11:38 PM.
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2009, 06:05 AM   #20
302army187
5th Gear Member
1989 Ford Mustang
 
302army187's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Vehicle: 89 mustang lx 'vert
Location: colorado
Posts: 3,241
Default

you need more "go" mod's.

also what your GF said was pretty ****ed up if she was just saying it to mess with you. Maybe she liked the other cars more.....
__________________
302; Cobra T5, 4.10's, ported E7's, Typhoon intake, full bolton's, full exhaust, NX 100-150wet shot
UPR upper/lower control arms, MM full length subframes, Strange Engineering 10way Shocks & Struts
Mods on the way: Ported&O-Ringed Trick Flow heads, TF stage 2 cam, a/c removal, battery relocation

Thanks for the sig' Xeno!
302army187 is online now   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1995, vette

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:40 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company