The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-01-2009, 10:51 AM   #11
S8ER01Z
5th Gear Member
2001 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 2001 Camaro Z28
Location: IL
Posts: 3,768
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtstang View Post
Those numbers look much more believable! I know the LS1 was underatted, but when guys started claiming 310-315 rwhp, i really started to wonder.

Now, i've also heard that 2001-2002 LS1's dynoed a little higher because of a different intake. Was it really significant, or really just a couple hp?
Just remember Dynos are tools... you can take your car to 5 different dynos and come home with 5 completely different numbers so I wouldn't say the numbers are BS they are just numbers. That's what is so great about the track.. it's 'standardized'.

We got a better intake but we also got a weaker truck cam... everything I've seen shows no real peak gains but more power under the curve. Considering the 1998 car still holds the record in the 1/4 mile I can't believe my 01 is making more power.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
2001 Z28 M6 - 13.1 @ 108mph 2.1 60ft / Bone Stock
3600lbs Race / 3440lbs Curb - 322rwhp/341rwtrq (1LE Springs/FRA/LID)
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 10:53 AM   #12
Projectquick
5th Gear Member
1986 Ford Mustang
 
Projectquick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 86 LX
Location: Jersey
Posts: 2,368
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtstang View Post
Those numbers look much more believable! I know the LS1 was underatted, but when guys started claiming 310-315 rwhp, i really started to wonder.

Now, i've also heard that 2001-2002 LS1's dynoed a little higher because of a different intake. Was it really significant, or really just a couple hp?
Usually around 300 whp is the general rule of thumb for a stock LS1. Like S8ER said, dynos can be made to say whatever the shop owner wants, so you have to take those numbers with a grain of salt.
__________________
86 LX
bolt on cammed 5.0 with 125 shot.
351w build starting
Projectquick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 11:05 AM   #13
mrtstang
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2004, Ford, Mustang Gt
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,825
Default

Yeah, i totally agree with you guys on the dyno thing! I dynoed my car on 2 different dynojets within a 2 week period (shops were having their "dyno days") and got an extra 12 hp between the 2. The weather was similar, and they were both in house dynojets.

So, now i just stick with one dyno (weather it's right or wrong) to accurately track my progress.
__________________
2004 DSG Mustang Gt, BBK long tubes, BBK catted h pipe, SSS Terminator Catback, K&N cai, Steeda UDP's, Accufab 75mm tb/plenum, FRPP aluminum ds, Motive 3.90 gear, Alternative Auto custom tune, Steeda Tri-Ax, DD black bullitts w/315's Nitto 555R's, & 100 shot N20. 269/305 na, 373/528 N20
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 02:41 PM   #14
98LS1
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: North Cackilacky
Posts: 7,815
Send a message via AIM to 98LS1
Default

I had my old car dyno'd on several dyno's. It was one of the slower years being a '98, and it still made 325rwhp with iirc just a cutout. That was through an automatic btw. Then, after the cam/headers swap, it made 400'ish rwhp and roughly the same torque. Then, on another dyno again, it made 500rwhp/496rwtq on a 100hp dry shot on the factory fuel system.

Anyhow, there's a personal FYI for ya.

EDIT: I know MM&FF tested a stock LS1 Camaro and it put down 32xrwhp. There's a link to it somewhere on here. I'm just too lazy to dig it up.
__________________
2000 FRC M6
Heads/Cam/75 shot/Stock intake/Ported stock TB
3.90 gear
10.7 @ 130 mph
6.8 @ 104 mph

1998 TransAm SOLD!
Cam only, 8.8" rear, 4.10's
500rwhp/496rwtq
Dry kit/stock fuel system

Idle Video



˙ǝɹnʇɐuƃıs ʎɯ uı pǝʇsǝɹǝʇuı ʎllɐǝɹ ǝɹɐ noʎ sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı

Last edited by 98LS1; 10-01-2009 at 02:44 PM.
98LS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-01-2009, 07:25 PM   #15
Stone629
5th Gear Member
2009 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2009, Ford, GT/CS
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,757
Default

Good run S8ER! Sounds like you had him if he hadn't of jumped.
__________________
2009 GT/CS, Vapor Silver, Manual '
308.4 RWHP/317.4 RWTQ
13.18 at 107 mph (2.0 60')...(1,243' DA, 75 degrees)
8.58 1/8th at 85 mph

2003 Mach 1, DSG, Manual
O/RX, Flowmaster Cat-back, weld-in subframes, KN Filter
13.1 at 107.97 Mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubTexel View Post
And when I win, I club a baby seal in front of the loser to let him know that it's his fault the baby seal died because he lost.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
09, 2004, 60, 60l, ford, gto, mustang

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company