The unofficial resource center for Mustang owners and enthusiasts
Ford Mustang Forums - Ford Mustang Classifieds - MustangForums.com Photo Galleries - MustangForums.com Chat Room - Create an Account - Mustang News


Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-04-2009, 10:32 PM   #1
00_buck
1st Gear Member
 
00_buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang GT
Location: GA
Posts: 122
Cool New Camaros are slow...

I respected the new camaros much more when I heard about the power they boasted but I raced one today at the stop light to about 85-90 mph and pulled away from it in 1st gear. Granted I have drag radials and a performance transmission, I still expected the SS with 426 (or even 400 if it was an automatic) horsepower to be more of a challenge. I don't know how far away I was because there's no way to tell off the track and I don't know my 1/4 mile time since i upped my boost (and went with the focus fuel pump) but my old time at 7 lbs. was 13.25 and now it's at 10 lbs. and a measly 330 rwhp. I think the LS1 camaros are better than the new ones. But I'll say I've lost some respect for the camaro... Don't feed into all the hype that surrounds the camaro.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
99 gt vert, auto 2400 stall, transgo stage III shift kit, 3.55 gear, derale tranny cooler, 75 mm TB, CAI, MSD Ig. coils, coated long tube headers w/offroad pipes, eibach springs, SCT Livewire tuner, Saleen Series IV SC w/ Chicane pulley, Chicane intercooler, LFP Heat Exchanger, Scott Vanhoose's Idler pulley, and Nitto 555 drag radials. 331 rwhp 318 rwt @ 10 psi.

Last edited by 00_buck; 10-04-2009 at 10:37 PM.
00_buck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:36 PM   #2
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert 1 of 1001
Location: Pacific Beach, San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,230
Default

Geez I'd hope a blown 2v could run with a new Camaro. You must have run on an awfully conservative dyno to only see 330rwhp on 10lbs of boost. Also the L99's(auto) have been a big disappointment, they have been dyno'n at 330-340rwhp and trapping at 106-107mph max.
__________________


For Sale:
17" x 8" Authentic Cobra R's

1983 Mustang GT Convertible 1 of 1001 '83 GT Vert's <-New Pics
2006 Mazda 3s Hatch

Last edited by 83gtragtop; 10-04-2009 at 10:39 PM.
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:46 PM   #3
Stone629
5th Gear Member
2009 Ford Mustang
My Garage
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2009, Ford, GT/CS
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 4,705
Default

A lot of SS kills popping up here all of a sudden.
__________________
2009 GT/CS, Vapor Silver, Manual '
308.4 RWHP/317.4 RWTQ
13.18 at 107 mph (2.0 60')...(1,243' DA, 75 degrees)
8.58 1/8th at 85 mph

2003 Mach 1, DSG, Manual, couple Mods
No ET yet.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SubTexel View Post
And when I win, I club a baby seal in front of the loser to let him know that it's his fault the baby seal died because he lost.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:47 PM   #4
mrtstang
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2004, Ford, Mustang Gt
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,785
Default

This is no surprise! You have gears with similar power, and are several hundred pounds lighter.

Nice kill anyway!
__________________
2004 DSG Mustang Gt, BBK long tubes, BBK catted h pipe, SSS Terminator Catback, K&N cai, Steeda UDP's, Accufab 75mm tb/plenum, FRPP aluminum ds, Motive 3.90 gear, Alternative Auto custom tune, Steeda Tri-Ax, DD black bullitts w/315's Nitto 555R's, & 100 shot N20. 269/305 na, 373/528 N20
mrtstang is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 10:52 PM   #5
Grabber
5th Gear Member
2003 Ford Mustang
 
Grabber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Vehicle: 2003 Cobra
Location: Mount Prospect
Posts: 3,173
Default

How much did you beat the SS by?
__________________
2003 10th Anni Torch Red Cobra 462 RWHP 486 RWTQ SAE
Fluidyne Heat Exchanger
H&R Springs
K&N FIPK
Mac O/R Prochamber and Borla Stinger C/B
BF 2.76 Pulley
LDC Chicago HCM
Many more mods
Grabber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2009, 11:44 PM   #6
JT76
Moderator
 
JT76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Vehicle: 2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: IN THE ZONE
Posts: 4,545
Send a message via AIM to JT76
Default

your surprised you beat a stock auto camaro with a supercharged mustang? :/
__________________

2000 Trans Am WS6 M6
'09- Cam/Exhaust/100 shot
'10- D1SC Procharger custom build in progress
JT76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 01:35 AM   #7
72MachOne99GT
6th Gear Member
1999 Ford Mustang
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 6,905
Send a message via AIM to 72MachOne99GT Send a message via Yahoo to 72MachOne99GT
Default

I don't really like the new Camaro, but I'm also not so biased as that I degrade a car solely because I happen to dislike it.

For right around *sometimes under* 30K dollars, you can have a high 12 second (for now, until more passes get made) with a full factory warranty.

That's just as, if not quicker, than the record stock LS1 passes. The motor has MORE capabilities as far as performance once modding begins. Look at LS3 numbers in Corvettes, that's scary ss****.

However, I suppose if you're surprised that a blown 2v GT with a set of DR's and a stall beat a stock '10 SS, then you're not likely to understand that logic above either.
__________________
'99 GT-5sp.
4.10's, O/R H, catback, MT's
13.6@100 1.8 60'
72MachOne99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 02:32 AM   #8
tspence45
4th Gear Member
1994 Chevrolet Camaro
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Monmouth, IL
Posts: 1,557
Default

A blown 2v beats a stock '10 Camaro SS, and that means the SS is slow? I honestly don't think they're slow. A local guy set the bone stock record not long ago, at my local track. He hit 12.87 in ~1000' DA. Give it some more time, when we get down to around 0' DA, and even in the negatives, and it should run mid 12's. For a bone stock car, in its price range, that's hauling ass. Should make quick work of an LS1. With equal drivers, I'd say the new Camaro has a definate edge on the older LS1's, which it should anyways. No use in making a newer model slower than the last.
__________________

98 Trans Am M6-Lid, SSRA, LT's, O/R H-pipe, Hurst Billet/Plus STS, LCA's, PHB, and DR' LS6 intake manifold and tune coming soon)
http://www.cardomain.com/id/tspence45
tspence45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 04:17 AM   #9
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
2004 Dodge SRT-4
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 2004 Stage 3 SRT-4
Location: usally a state of confusion. But I live in jersey
Posts: 6,662
Default

A car that runs 12's bone stock and traps over 110 is over hyped? Wonder how fast it would be if you throw 10 grand in mods on it like your car has?
__________________
11.79@118.53
BEST 60=1.68
BEST TRAP SPEED=120.60

I've never actually raced but according to my dyno numbers. I should run 8s on street tires.



bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2009, 06:01 AM   #10
00_buck
1st Gear Member
 
00_buck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang GT
Location: GA
Posts: 122
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JT76 View Post
your surprised you beat a stock auto camaro with a supercharged mustang? :/
don't know if it was auto or manual, didn't exactly stop and ask. He had a sweet looking transformers edition SS though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Grabber View Post
How much did you beat the SS by?
i didn't but his bumper wasn't close to mine so it wasn't like .10 or .20 of a second maybe closer to .5 which is why i think it was a manual over an auto or maybe a slightly modded auto.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
Geez I'd hope a blown 2v could run with a new Camaro. You must have run on an awfully conservative dyno to only see 330rwhp on 10lbs of boost. Also the L99's(auto) have been a big disappointment, they have been dyno'n at 330-340rwhp and trapping at 106-107mph max.
that and the saleen SC's just aren't that powerful when compared to the KB or Vortech. On a stock manual they dyno only at about 300 rwhp. i have an auto but if it were a manual it would be closer to 350 rwhp for me. I don't feed into power ratings too much, i just care how fast i get down the track and i've beaten cars with way higher power ratings probably due to upgrading my tranny and tires.
__________________
99 gt vert, auto 2400 stall, transgo stage III shift kit, 3.55 gear, derale tranny cooler, 75 mm TB, CAI, MSD Ig. coils, coated long tube headers w/offroad pipes, eibach springs, SCT Livewire tuner, Saleen Series IV SC w/ Chicane pulley, Chicane intercooler, LFP Heat Exchanger, Scott Vanhoose's Idler pulley, and Nitto 555 drag radials. 331 rwhp 318 rwt @ 10 psi.

Last edited by Stkjock; 10-05-2009 at 06:13 AM. Reason: please use the multi quote feature
00_buck is offline   Reply With Quote



Reply



Tags
1998, 4th, 85, 90, bar, cai, camaro, camaros, faster, forums, frpp, gen, mustang, panhard, slow, start, upper

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off
Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:31 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company