You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
According to the NHRA correction factor, NA lose 50% more that FI.
So, when an EVO or STI or Mustang run 13.5 at sea level.
Up at 6000' DA, they run 14.0 and Mustangs run 14.5. That's what sucks.
__________________
'07 GT - AT / IUP / Charcoal int / Carbon fiber dash
JLT / SCT Xcal 2 / Bama 91 Race / Eibach Pro / 3.73's
Tint / Shorty / Sequentials / Cervinis side louvers
BFG G-Force SS A/S P255/45-18 / ADR Wheels BoomTube Crew Member
13.66 @ 100 (DA 4300')
Not to nit-pick or anything, but 14.7 - 3.3 = 11.4, not 11.7.
just to give you an idea of the touchiness in this equation... I went back and edited everything and that 0.3PSI drop gave an overall change in around 4 BHP in our final difference between FI and NA @ 6,000ft.... even if boost pressure was up 2PSI the difference would be even more different
Quote:
According to the NHRA correction factor, NA lose 50% more that FI.
So, when an EVO or STI or Mustang run 13.5 at sea level.
Up at 6000' DA, they run 14.0 and Mustangs run 14.5. That's what sucks.
just taking 50% off is a little lazy IMO.... the amount of PSI you are running has A LOT to so with the percentage of more power you make
let's take your STI logic @ 6,000DA
stock 2005 STI vs stock 2005 mustang GT vs Terminator
2005 mustang GT
305BHP N/A
2005 STI
300BHP @ 13.5PSI
Terminator
390BHP @ 8PSI
alright... here goes
factoring in 6,000ft the atmospheric pressure surrounding all cars is 11.4PSI
so as you can see the 50% rule is a GREAT rule of thumb to get you in the general area seeing as the 2005 STI loses 12% of it's power @ 6,000ft and the mustang GT loses 22% of it's power @ 6,000ft (45% more power loss than STI)... but from looking at the equations you can see that @ 8PSI the terminator loses a bit more (GT has only 35% more power loss than terminator) ... also, if the STI upped it's boost pressure it would end up losing less than 12% of it's already increased power... making boost @ elevation a win win situation
let's just assume the STI upped to 17.5PSI and made 370BHP (estimating power numbers to PSI for sake of explanation)
so @ stock boost (13.5) the mustang was losing 45% more power @ 6,000ft..... @ 17.5PSI the stang is losing 55% more power than the STI
again, this is just a rough translation and will be looking at fine tuning it... but at this point I think it's safe to say it's a decent little calculator to see just how much power you are losing due to elevation
__________________
Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 10-20-2009 at 01:56 PM.
So, in a bench racing sense, a GT with 304 BHP won't beat a Terminator with 333 BHP.
Also Brian, where are you getting 7PSI from? If you are thinking Terminators make 7 PSI from the factory, it's actually 8 PSI. If not, disregard.
__________________
2003 10th Anni Torch Red Cobra 462 RWHP 486 RWTQ SAE
Fluidyne Heat Exchanger
H&R Springs
K&N FIPK
Mac O/R Prochamber and Borla Stinger C/B
BF 2.76 Pulley
LDC Chicago HCM
Many more mods
So, in a bench racing sense, a GT with 304 BHP won't beat a Terminator with 333 BHP.
where did this come from?
previous argument with someone else I don't know about? lol
also, I just quickly glanced @ SVTperformance to see stock boost numbers for terminator... someone said 7PSI so that's what I went with, either way it still doesn't change the formula at all
Vehicle: 1994 Mustang Super Special Hooker Edition GT
Location: Calgary Alberta Canada
Posts: 3,108
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stkjock
Nice write up Brian.....
Howard well with NO2 you have air in a bottle... not quite the same
Thats why I said real men use it, turbos up here can also be problomatic, I know alot of guys with really tweaked turbo race cars and such have to turn their boost down when racing around calgary or else burn out their turbos
previous argument with someone else I don't know about? lol
also, I just quickly glanced @ SVTperformance to see stock boost numbers for terminator... someone said 7PSI so that's what I went with, either way it still doesn't change the formula at all
Mishri claimed to beat one up to 100 or something like that, or hang with it within a fender. Also, this Cobra was slightly modded too.
Either way, ROFL.
Gotcha on the formula, I just wanted to make sure your info was right. It's 8 PSI. I've personally measure that boost level.
__________________
2003 10th Anni Torch Red Cobra 462 RWHP 486 RWTQ SAE
Fluidyne Heat Exchanger
H&R Springs
K&N FIPK
Mac O/R Prochamber and Borla Stinger C/B
BF 2.76 Pulley
LDC Chicago HCM
Many more mods
The guy Mishri raced who had the Termi told him that his car was broken.
I know, ricer excuse...
Yes indeed. However, Mishri has told that story several times, and holds on dearly to that "kill" or "race"
All good I guess...
__________________
2003 10th Anni Torch Red Cobra 462 RWHP 486 RWTQ SAE
Fluidyne Heat Exchanger
H&R Springs
K&N FIPK
Mac O/R Prochamber and Borla Stinger C/B
BF 2.76 Pulley
LDC Chicago HCM
Many more mods
I'd be more curious to see him race one at the track. Or race one myself. I know what should happen but it would be interesting to dissect the slips. I've never seen one at our track. Or a GT500. Mishri's car is the only NA s197 I've seen race out there. One of the downsides in living here in Montucky. There just isn't enough people tracking their cars.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company