Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


Street/Strip Raced a guy from a light? Had that ride of yours on the timed track? Tell your story here.
Sponsored by Roush Performance

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Mustang vs srt4

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-12-2011, 05:56 PM   #41
perfect.disguise
5th Gear Member
 
perfect.disguise's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 04 Srt-4
Location: VA
Posts: 2,374
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BStowers023 View Post
I am sure the 2v is a ~116 car
Not in the 1/8th, and not in the 1/4 with 325whp, it just gets crazier as we go. :/
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
98 Neon..auto Intense Blue Sport.. to be continued..
04 Srt-4 539whp 489ft-lbs
perfect.disguise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2011, 06:18 PM   #42
BStowers023
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Vehicle: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simpsonfan13 View Post
lololololololol. so a car that has a 55hp AND a weight advantage some how looses?
in my experience, whenever some one "doesn't want to give their specs/pop their hood" it means they're hiding something. kinda like the time my buddy bought a 97 z28. the guy he bought it from was runing around town claiming mid-12's and apparently had the slips to prove it. BUT!
He claimed he only did some "very special tuning" of a couple of "stock things"and nothing else. no h/c/i no f/i nada. then my friend bought the car (utterly unbeknown to me)and found the lid, stall, NAWSZZZZZ tank etc. was lol.
55 at the VERY most. Probably more like 35 I have seen under the hood of this car it has a kit but the bottle was out of the car.
BStowers023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 08:33 AM   #43
Maraman
3rd Gear Member
 
Maraman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 2012 GT
Location: Michigan
Posts: 786
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simpsonfan13 View Post
lololololololol. so a car that has a 55hp AND a weight advantage some how looses?in my experience, whenever some one "doesn't want to give their specs/pop their hood" it means they're hiding something. kinda like the time my buddy bought a 97 z28. the guy he bought it from was runing around town claiming mid-12's and apparently had the slips to prove it. BUT!
He claimed he only did some "very special tuning" of a couple of "stock things"and nothing else. no h/c/i no f/i nada. then my friend bought the car (utterly unbeknown to me)and found the lid, stall, NAWSZZZZZ tank etc. was lol.
yea thats the point me and everyone else in this thread are trying to make.

at this point it seems to me like this guy dosnt have his facts straight, or the 2v was indeed spraying.
__________________


2012 Grabber Blue GT Manual
JLT CAI/BAMA 93/Race, 3.73's, SLP LM Axlebacks - 388.2 RWHP 372.3 TQ
20x8.5 & 20x10 Black Chrome Bullitt Motorsports wheels with Nitto NT555's

SOLD
06 GT
Maraman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 10:37 AM   #44
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

That's why I dropped put of this thread a couple pages back.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 04:49 PM   #45
BStowers023
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Vehicle: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maraman View Post
yea thats the point me and everyone else in this thread are trying to make.

at this point it seems to me like this guy dosnt have his facts straight, or the 2v was indeed spraying.
Sorry it does not calculate with ricer hp to weight ratios. I have a idea lets just dyno cars and weight them that way there will be no need to race them I posted everything there is to know. The 2v is built heads/cams higher compression on 93oct with 4.10s/t56. It is mostly a nitrous car but is no turd on motor and made 325. It is ~3300lbs WITH driver. Neon is a stage 3 car with high octane mode and q16. Not sure on power but my honest guess is 340-380. Both can drive the car to its potential.

The 2v is suppose to do a 40 with a bolt-on ls2 c6 tonight. I will post the results if it happens
BStowers023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:05 PM   #46
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

That GT is a low 13/12.9 car on street tires off the spray, and a mid 12 car on DRs or whatever running NA. I'd bet money its not going to trap more than 109-110. Ask me how I know. Spraying... yea, different story.

Stage 3 SRTs with toys and all that **** run low 12s, high 11s on slicks and trap anywhere from 115-120 mph. Its obvious that the GT outran him, and props to him, but it flat out doesn't add up, that's all. Welcome to the S/S section, lol.

The 3300lb with driver does throw off my estimates up there^^^ but not enough to yank that SRT like he did without giggle gas.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.

Last edited by Stone629; 08-13-2011 at 05:07 PM.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:25 PM   #47
BStowers023
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Vehicle: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
That GT is a low 13/12.9 car on street tires off the spray, and a mid 12 car on DRs or whatever running NA. I'd bet money its not going to trap more than 109-110. Ask me how I know. Spraying... yea, different story.

Stage 3 SRTs with toys and all that **** run low 12s, high 11s on slicks and trap anywhere from 115-120 mph. Its obvious that the GT outran him, and props to him, but it flat out doesn't add up, that's all. Welcome to the S/S section, lol.

The 3300lb with driver does throw off my estimates up there^^^ but not enough to yank that SRT like he did without giggle gas.
You are a little off that car went 12.88 with bolt-ons and a tire. It will probably go 11s with a tire as it sits and trap well above 109-110. But I will ask anyways how do you know?
BStowers023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:30 PM   #48
GTRACER88
5th Gear Member
 
GTRACER88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Vehicle: 2012 Mustang 5.0L
Location: Houston, Tx
Posts: 2,112
Default

Just going to throw it out there, I have seen GT's with built bottom end, Heads, and cams rev to 7K and make power all the way there. It possible that the GT is making more than he claims and the SRT 4 is making less than yall may think.

Judging by the video the mustang was in first gear. Meaning that they were going about 40 in first. Listen how fast he shifted. Its also possible the skittle couldn't catch traction. Another possibility was that the skittle was not in power band. Notice how the skittle is beginning to catch up right at the end.. Its all possible.


However, being an ex nitrous user... Im willing to bet, and I am 99% sure that I can tell, that he is spraying. I can be wrong though because its been over a year..
__________________
2011 Grabber Blue V6 -- SuperSlow...
GTRACER88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:37 PM   #49
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BStowers023 View Post
You are a little off that car went 12.88 with bolt-ons and a tire. It will probably go 11s with a tire as it sits and trap well above 109-110. But I will ask anyways how do you know?
I've had 3 Mach 1s, all making right at 310 RWHP, all on 4.10s, but at full weight. They all went 12.9-13.0 at 107-109.9 on decent 1.8-2.0 60's. They were on street tires, and they were full weight minus spares, but another 10 rwhp wouldn't of come anywhere near a bonified stage 3 SRT-4, regardless of them being full weight or even -200lbs. A guy on here named RYGI has gone low 12s with boltons and slicks, but his trap was still 111 and under.

Had it of been from a dig, fine, this would all make sense. But it was from a roll, so traps are what we have to look at and you already stated what you THINK that GT traps, but we all know in reality a Stg 3 traps considerably higher, so here we are with all the skepticism.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.

Last edited by Stone629; 08-13-2011 at 05:40 PM.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:46 PM   #50
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,310
Default

Click the image to open in full size.
__________________
Morbid Intentions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:48 PM   #51
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

Holy hell, I just **** myself^^
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 05:53 PM   #52
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Holy hell, I just **** myself^^
if you think about it, it's the same posting pattern and same arguments our little 3V friend used to run, all the way down to using a very fishy street racing vid to try and prove everyone wrong... so that's the only thing I ask myself when reading this thread... obviously all the other stuff is BS...

so...


to be or not to be, THAT is the question!

xD
__________________
Morbid Intentions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:00 PM   #53
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

Well, the first two letters of his username are "BS", so its plausible.


BS, are you bolton??
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:05 PM   #54
BStowers023
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Vehicle: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
I've had 3 Mach 1s, all making right at 310 RWHP, all on 4.10s, but at full weight. They all went 12.9-13.0 at 107-109.9 on decent 1.8-2.0 60's. They were on street tires, and they were full weight minus spares, but another 10 rwhp wouldn't of come anywhere near a bonified stage 3 SRT-4, regardless of them being full weight or even -200lbs. A guy on here named RYGI has gone low 12s with boltons and slicks, but his trap was still 111 and under.

Had it of been from a dig, fine, this would all make sense. But it was from a roll, so traps are what we have to look at and you already stated what you THINK that GT traps, but we all know in reality a Stg 3 traps considerably higher, so here we are with all the skepticism.
Yea Rygi trapped 113 and was 200lbs heavier then the gt. You said it yourself 115-120 for a srt4 so not sure how that is so much higher then ~116. So take in to consideration that the gt hit harder and carried that momentum then the 1-2 mph that the srt4 may have had up top was just not enough to over come that. Get it?
BStowers023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:06 PM   #55
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Well, the first two letters of his username are "BS", so its plausible.


BS, are you bolton??
well stck looked into it for me and bolton's IP is 3 points away from this guys



lulz
__________________

Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 08-13-2011 at 06:09 PM.
Morbid Intentions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:07 PM   #56
Stkjock
Retired Mod
 
Stkjock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2008 Shelby GT500
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 7,573
Default

Stowers

your habits lead me to believe you are our banned friend Bolton3V

you lied on your profile location as OH, when your IP clearly is MS, and the IP is nearly a match.....

wanna fess up??
__________________
2008 Shelby GT500 - L&M Engines - Lund Racing Tuned - 20psi

2006 Mustang GT SOLD - Gone and not forgotten 11.49 @121.45 DA Corrected 11.54 @ 120.92
Stkjock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:15 PM   #57
BStowers023
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Vehicle: 2002 Pontiac Trans Am WS6
Location: Ohio
Posts: 78
Default

I am currently stationed in Gulfport Ms seabee base. Before you go off saying that I am somebody that I am not maybe you should check the user name. This is not the only site that I use this user name on.

Last edited by BStowers023; 08-13-2011 at 06:17 PM.
BStowers023 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:24 PM   #58
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,310
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BStowers023 View Post
I am currently stationed in Gulfport Ms seabee base. Before you go off saying that I am somebody that I am not maybe you should check the user name. This is not the only site that I use this user name on.
jesus, how many time are you gonna edit where you're stationed?
__________________
Morbid Intentions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:33 PM   #59
Morbid Intentions
Wash Rinse Repeat
 
Morbid Intentions's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Vehicle: 2006 Pontiac GTO
Location: Michigan
Posts: 6,310
Default

under further research of both usernames I have seen BOTH usernames used and both usernames troll together

and I have also seen an immense paper trail of asshattery between both names... including some mysterious character that goes by the name "automach1"... and by the way he posts we can all see who that is


I will let you read the thread in question and come to your own conclusions guys...

http://ls1tech.com/forums/street-rac...n-swap-gt.html

I mean does this not look familiar?

Quote:
LOL @ trapping 112-113 in a 298 rwhp auto Mach1. Where's your time slips? You must have a ton of weight reduction then. My GTP beats auto mach 1's and also gets drilled by STOCK 6.0 M6 GTO's.
Quote:
Intake, exhaust and tune are not going to add 8-12 mph to your trap idiot

so bolton... how long is BStowers gonna let you use his account for? how far away are your rooms at the base buddy?
__________________

Last edited by Morbid Intentions; 08-13-2011 at 06:43 PM.
Morbid Intentions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:50 PM   #60
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

Well, well, well... good to see you decided to join us again, Michael. You sure are a persistent sombich, I'll give you that much.

Nice catch, fellas.

Another one of BStowers vids, remember this one.... featuring Bolton (aka, "azzhole") himself, lol

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-2c9..._order&list=UL
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.

Last edited by Stone629; 08-13-2011 at 06:55 PM.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-13-2011, 06:50 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
2011, 2012, 37, 95, gt, mustang, srt, srt4, stage, v6, win

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:50 PM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup