FutBall23

So i was driving home with my girlfreind, cming back from asheville. i was goin kinda slow just to see what i could find, so 2 guys in a 96-98 gt pull beside me, look at my car, i nod to show em im interested in a race. i wait for him jump at about 55, the ends at somewhere around 80-85, the guy let off when i pulled passed him. I only have a few mods, were the stock 96-98 faster than stock 94-95?

XxphantomsnypzxX

I think its not much difference, maybe weight could be a factor?

*Blk_96_Stang_GT*

I think the 94-97's are all rated at 215HP and the 98's are rated at 225. And i think the 96-98's weigh less then the 94-95's so maybe you were just a better driver then he was.

TorchV6

The 96-97 had a 4.6 with 215hp and 285tq weighing in at 3280 which is the same as the 94-95 5.0's. But the 98 had a 4.6 kickin 225hp and 290tq weighing in at 3227. So I would say the 98 is the fastest out of the 94-98 styles

XxphantomsnypzxX

I read it had 220hp close enough tho whered they shave the weight in the 98?

FutBall23

the 94-95 had 225 hp and 300 tq., mine is a convertible so im sure that evened it out, also he couldve been bone stock, i do think he has some exhaust stuff.

waxyourboard

94-95 have 215 hp and 285 torque. Slowest mustangs of the bunch. Especially considering the 'vert. Was he AOD?

Polonius

Some of the 98 GT weight loss wouldve been the removal of 2 cats, bringing it to 4 total. That probably had to do with the 10hp gain as well.

JonBeast

They have a different computer, and better tuned exhaust

w8less

the 94-95's only have 215 due to smaller intake runners compared to the foxes which have 225 thats the only difference between the the two motor wise and 94-95's also have 4 cats.