You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
How much does this supercharger affect drivability vs. a 2.6L Kenne Bell??? What are the MPG differences. Not like gas bothers me just wondering. Im asking because im thinking on starting a new project maybe say 03-04 cobra FTW!
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members. Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
Well think deeply into that project ask some people that know a lot about those large chargers. As for gas mileage, there shouldn't be a mpg difference unless your under boost, then its a whole nother ballpark. the 3.4 L whipple is a beast and likes to spin fast and does not put down great numbers until it does. That supercharger isn't really designed for the all stock car, i mean sure you can put it on your stock cobra but you will get better use out of a 2.3 with a stock car until you get a stroker heads cams for the 3.4 whipple. Im not a KB guy costumer service sucks. And they blow seals....
__________________
03 cobra vert
622 rwhp 614 rwtq new numbers 18lbs of boost. 2.3whipple gen 2. Ported heads, ford gt cams, Lt's, all other supporting mods.
I'd just stick with the stock Eaton and maybe have it ported! ...I put down a 12.09@117.6 with Nitto DR's with my STOCK Eaton...should go 11.8's with some better traction...
mmm single turbo for the win, 03 cobra with 88mm turbo 1053 horsepower at only 20psi, stock stroke .030 bore heads cam, , next year 5.1L stroker 2,000 horsepower intercooler and more boost...too bad its not my car just a couple of friends i know
__________________
95 gt vert: 331 stroker, d-1sc @ 10 lbs,582 rwhp 511 ft. Tq
2003 sonic blue cobra KB 2.2 @ 19psi,supporting mod, solid 8.8 601 rwhp 584 rwtq
I'd just stick with the stock Eaton and maybe have it ported! ...I put down a 12.09@117.6 with Nitto DR's with my STOCK Eaton...should go 11.8's with some better traction...
You see this is what my car runs now... i want 10's or even high 9's. I know about porting the eaton by steigmeier or what ever they are called, just want more. I love turbo's but it will cost well over 10K and i can do alot of things with 10K. Like building the IRS and putting 700+ RWHP with a supercharger to the ground. I just want to now the difference in drivabillity between the two superchargers... Does anyone know? My goal is 600-700 RWHP, thats my target. Thanks!
3.4L whipple is a beast of a supercharger, but as mentioned, you will not take advantage of it, unless ur running 21+ psi... With bone stock engines, over 700rwhp is possible...
If you really want some awesome twin screw hp, do a heads/cams stroker set up with the 3.4 whipple... JR's car has seen over 800rwhp through a C4 automatic transmission!!!
If you want a tamer build, I would do a 2.6 KB....
__________________
Wisdom is simply the awareness of your own ignorance...
HAVOC
What i mean is there much of a difference between 21 PSI and 16 PSI for regular street use. Just using it for a DD is the 5 PSI such a difference or is it just minimal?
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company