What would you like to see or are disappointed about in the 2015?
05-20-2014, 07:53 AM
#63
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,329
yeah, the more I look at it, the less I like it. I think taking it global was a mistake. Thanks to those European pedestrian impact regulations, it now has that slightly droopy bull-nose just like the Fusion/Mondeo and pretty much every other global mid-size car.
05-21-2014, 06:30 AM
#64
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 220
Yes everybody tells me that the front looks, like the fusion, it really lost the Mustang identity, from the front looks like another car not a Mustang. Rear, side and top is OK, I think on the back the pony emblem looks better than that simple big GT letters, I prefer to remove them and maybe replace them they look cheap. And I'm not sure about the rear colored diaper, probably the rear difusser should be black.
05-24-2014, 03:44 PM
#66
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: wi
Posts: 163
Just had 1 at local dealer. took a quick look Interior Nice. rest of car. No Thanks. and Dont see Mustleman How its low priced add a few options and your over 40K really quick. Specially for a GT. So glad got my 14.
05-24-2014, 07:57 PM
#67
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,329
It's "low priced" because they re-engineered almost the entire car, made the rear suspension 3x more complicated, made the interior 2x better, and only raised MSRP by ~ $2k.
05-25-2014, 12:31 PM
#68
With the lower and wider stance, nothing short of 10-11 inch width tires will do it justice, especially considering the comparable cars the Mustang will compete with in the market.
Chevy learned their lesson very well in the Camaro and made a heavy beast of a car into a track dominator. There is no reason for Ford to just stop with the goal of the S550 GT to out-handle a Boss 302, Ford should be looking to outdo competition like the M3 and M4 and other cars in similar comparison.
05-25-2014, 12:36 PM
#69
Yes everybody tells me that the front looks, like the fusion, it really lost the Mustang identity, from the front looks like another car not a Mustang. Rear, side and top is OK, I think on the back the pony emblem looks better than that simple big GT letters, I prefer to remove them and maybe replace them they look cheap. And I'm not sure about the rear colored diaper, probably the rear difusser should be black.
If the front end design is because of EU auto pedestrian protection regulations, then put this ugly Aston Martin only Mustangs to be exported to the EU. The EU can keep their ugly cars over there.
For America and the rest of the world, give us a much better designed and therefore infinitely better looking front end only to be sold to us.
