The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

95 5.0 vs 99+ 4.6

Old 07-09-2009, 06:13 PM
  #11  
Projectquick
5th Gear Member
 
Projectquick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Jersey
Posts: 2,445
Default

Unless the guy with the new edge sucked ***** at driving there is no way a stock 5.0 is going to stay with a PI 2v. My car should have about the same whp as a stock new edge and my car would clown the OPs any day of the week. No offense OP, just stating the facts.
Projectquick is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 07:14 PM
  #12  
87slutstang
1st Gear Member
 
87slutstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: california
Posts: 136
Default

4.6 2v mustangs are slow
87slutstang is offline  
Old 07-10-2009, 07:25 PM
  #13  
fausty
4th Gear Member
 
fausty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Miami ,FL
Posts: 1,429
Default

Originally Posted by Projectquick
Unless the guy with the new edge sucked ***** at driving there is no way a stock 5.0 is going to stay with a PI 2v. My car should have about the same whp as a stock new edge and my car would clown the OPs any day of the week. No offense OP, just stating the facts.
+1. I used to own a 95 5.0 vert with bbk headers/intake/tune and I would still lose badly to pi 4.6s. The fox 5.0's have the weight advantage on the sn95 5.0s.

Originally Posted by 87slutstang
4.6 2v mustangs are slow
No offense but both stock
pi 2v 4.6 > 5.0 in performance

Last edited by fausty; 07-10-2009 at 07:49 PM.
fausty is offline  
Old 07-12-2009, 12:13 AM
  #14  
drhoward
Penis Mod Erator
 
drhoward's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary Eh?
Posts: 5,096
Default

ya you should have gotten your *** kicked, nice race man
drhoward is offline  
Old 07-14-2009, 09:20 PM
  #15  
97tplsGT
4th Gear Member
 
97tplsGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Lynchburg, VA
Posts: 1,898
Default

I have to agree with everyone, you should lost every race. Are you POSITIVE it was a 99+ 2v? This sounds more like a 96-98 npi 4.6 encounter. They are puuuurty slow, 'specially with the 2.73's under it. (No offense to your ride op, just saying )

Not being a nay-sayer though, its for sure that anything can happen out there. If anything, you beat the driver, which should be more gratifying anyways. Just don't go expecting to beat up on too many other PI 2v's, as your car sits now
97tplsGT is offline  
Old 07-15-2009, 02:52 AM
  #16  
NoGo95GT
4th Gear Member
 
NoGo95GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,788
Default

Yeah, well at least the OP had fun. Our stock, 95 Mustang's are slow. I honestly can't see how he lost traction in 1st. In my basically stock 3.08 geared 95, I can screech the tires, but there is no way it will lose traction. Like everyone else said, he must have raced a NPI GT. A 14.0 second car is a big difference from a 15.0 second car, unless the other guy could not drive....at all.
NoGo95GT is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
3
10-09-2015 03:27 PM
Urambo Tauro
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
6
10-05-2015 09:37 PM
Matt's 95 Stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
2
10-05-2015 07:16 AM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
treesloth
New Member Area
4
09-28-2015 07:03 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 95 5.0 vs 99+ 4.6



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.