2010 Mustang GT vs. 2002 Firebird Trans Am

GrayGhost01GT · 08-06-2009, 11:10 PM

Just thought I would see what your guys thoughts where on a 2010 Mustang GT vs. 2002 Firebird Trans Am or 2002 Camaro SS? Head to Head Who do you think would win?

This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!

red96v6 · 08-06-2009, 11:18 PM

Stock for stock, stick vs. stick, Mustang loses I would think.

mrtstang · 08-07-2009, 12:25 AM

I'd give the edge to the LS1

Mudflap · 08-07-2009, 12:39 AM

Yeah, the T/A or Camaro gets the nod I think. I believe I remember seeing some mag pull a 12.9 in a stock one. I had an '00 Z28 6-speed that had nothing but a Borla catback, K&N filter and a Whisper lid, and that car probably could have given my blown '09 a pretty good run.

AmericanSpeed · 08-07-2009, 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by red96v6

Stock for stock, stick vs. stick, Mustang loses.

+1, but it would be close enough (depending on the type of race) that a small difference in driver mod could sway the outcome.

sccaii · 08-07-2009, 03:16 PM

Sorry those LS1 guys got you pretty good. I work with two firebird guys and a stock firehawk is a 330 - 345HP car with no mods and they are lighter than the GT. Easily with a bad driver a mid to low 13 second car and someone good might get them into the high 12's with dr's and a good launch. These guys bolt ons and a monster cam get into the mid 400WHP range NA.

Stkjock · 08-07-2009, 03:37 PM

wrong section.....

Elllis Juan.....

JOHNNY · 08-07-2009, 03:41 PM

If both cars were stock and you had the 373 gear it would be a coin toss driver would be the differance imo.

jtstakelin · 08-07-2009, 03:42 PM

LS1 FTW...Unfortunately

72MachOne99GT · 08-12-2009, 02:20 PM

I see the MAJORITY of LS1 times in the 13.2-13.4 section, with some outliers within .2-.3 in both directions.

LS1s race to win or lose.