Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip > The Racers Bench
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


new edge vs 2010

Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-13-2010, 10:45 PM   #1
SilverGT03
3rd Gear Member
 
SilverGT03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2003 Mustang GT
Location: Wellington, Florida
Posts: 602
Default new edge vs 2010

With the few mods that I currently have, how do you guys think I would hold up against a new 2010 gt? I'd think from either a dig or a first gear roll I might be able to get a jump but I could see the 2010 reeling me in once it got past 60 or so. What do you guys think?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
*FRPP 4.10s
*FRPP 31 Spline T-lok
*Moser 31 Spline Axles
*O/R H
*Flowmaster 40 Mufflers
*JLT CAI
*Xcal 3
*Steeda Tri-ax
Lowered with some appearance goodies
SilverGT03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 10:52 PM   #2
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Camaro SS
Location: MI
Posts: 5,873
Default

This might help answer your question. Make sure you watch the whole video. Notice how the New Edge gt kept up to the Mach compared to the 2010 gt.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/January_728887.htm
__________________
2000 Camaro SS, 6-speed with 4.10's, Pacesetter long tubes, ORY pipe, Magnaflow 14419 w/FM merge, forged TMS 370 LQ9, TSP stage 2.5/5.3 (862) heads, TMS custom cam, Fast 90 intake and TB, SLP lid, ASP UD crank pulley, SSRA, LS2/LS6 MAF, Detroit Truetrack with stock 10 bolt, custom tune, NX wet kit w/125 shot, chrome ZR1 rims with BFG dr's

Last edited by mrtstang; 01-13-2010 at 11:00 PM.
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 10:59 PM   #3
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2005 cadillac cts
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

He's about 1 second faster than you and 5 plus mph quicker, stock for stock. So going from there, I'd say intake, tune, gears, headers, and drags would give you more then enough of an edge (no pun intended) to beat the stock 10 by a car length or 2
swat 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2010, 11:09 PM   #4
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,008
Default

You should be fine up to a point, like the 1/8th mile or so. Probably really depends on who hooks better.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

2014 F-150, 5.0
Tuned.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:19 AM   #5
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert, 2011 Mustang 3.7L
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,883
Default

I think it will be close through the first couple gears but he will start to walk you slowly but surely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrtstang View Post
This might help answer your question. Make sure you watch the whole video. Notice how the New Edge gt kept up to the Mach compared to the 2010 gt.

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/January_728887.htm
OP's car does not have full boltons and probably makes 20-30 less rwhp then the car in the vid.

Quote:
Originally Posted by swat 79 View Post
He's about 1 second faster than you and 5 plus mph quicker, stock for stock. So going from there, I'd say intake, tune, gears, headers, and drags would give you more then enough of an edge (no pun intended) to beat the stock 10 by a car length or 2
Stock new edge vs stock '10 is about a 1/2 sec difference with similar drivers, maybe slightly more then that but not a second.
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 06:40 AM   #6
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang GT
Location: Jersey
Posts: 10,737
ItsUrFuneral
Default

Your mod list doesn't really have anything thats boosting your power level. You might hang to sixty but the more powerful car should eventually just walk on by.
__________________
ENGINE363 forged dart engine. 300 shot!TRANNY C4 with trans brake, 3800 stall, 9in. raceconverter, hurst shifter REAR Moser 35 spline kit with spool, FRPP 3.73 gearsSUSPENION UPR Upper & lower control arms, Strange 10 way dampers, coilovers up front, BBK sub frame connectors, UPR Tube K-member & A-arms NEW Mustang TIMES COMING.
2011 Camaro SS 12.34@110.92
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 11:39 AM   #7
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2005 cadillac cts
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
I think it will be close through the first couple gears but he will start to walk you slowly but surely.



OP's car does not have full boltons and probably makes 20-30 less rwhp then the car in the vid.



Stock new edge vs stock '10 is about a 1/2 sec difference with similar drivers, maybe slightly more then that but not a second.

new edge's around 14.2 (averages)

new 2010's around 13.3 (averages)

to beat him, he'd need to make up about a second worth of time in the quarter right?
swat 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:34 PM   #8
bolton3valve
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Vehicle: 2005 mustang
Location: MS
Posts: 723
Default

na its not that big of a diffrence stick new edges are high 13 cars
bolton3valve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 01:42 PM   #9
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Camaro SS
Location: MI
Posts: 5,873
Default

Yeah, it's goona be much harder for a 2010 gt to reach a 13.3 than it would be for a new edge to reach a 14.2 IMO. Despite what the magazines say.

When my buddy got his 08 gt manual (bone stock) we went out and ran few times, and (with current mods in sig) and got him pretty damn good each time. The 2010 has 15 more hp, so i don't think they would be a problem either...at least for a full bolt on, tuned, and geared new edge gt.
__________________
2000 Camaro SS, 6-speed with 4.10's, Pacesetter long tubes, ORY pipe, Magnaflow 14419 w/FM merge, forged TMS 370 LQ9, TSP stage 2.5/5.3 (862) heads, TMS custom cam, Fast 90 intake and TB, SLP lid, ASP UD crank pulley, SSRA, LS2/LS6 MAF, Detroit Truetrack with stock 10 bolt, custom tune, NX wet kit w/125 shot, chrome ZR1 rims with BFG dr's
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:18 PM   #10
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang GT
Location: Jersey
Posts: 10,737
ItsUrFuneral
Default

Am I missing something? Is the OP full bolt-ons plus tune or does he have the few mods mentioned in his sig?
__________________
ENGINE363 forged dart engine. 300 shot!TRANNY C4 with trans brake, 3800 stall, 9in. raceconverter, hurst shifter REAR Moser 35 spline kit with spool, FRPP 3.73 gearsSUSPENION UPR Upper & lower control arms, Strange 10 way dampers, coilovers up front, BBK sub frame connectors, UPR Tube K-member & A-arms NEW Mustang TIMES COMING.
2011 Camaro SS 12.34@110.92
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:29 PM   #11
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert, 2011 Mustang 3.7L
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swat 79 View Post
new edge's around 14.2 (averages)

new 2010's around 13.3 (averages)

to beat him, he'd need to make up about a second worth of time in the quarter right?
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:31 PM   #12
mrtstang
6th Gear Member
 
mrtstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Vehicle: 2000 Camaro SS
Location: MI
Posts: 5,873
Default

I think the op just has the mods mentioned in his sig. I don't know for sure, but he didn't state otherwise.

I was just stating my opinions against a full bolt on, geared , and tuned new edge gt. I'm sure in the op's case it will be much closer.
__________________
2000 Camaro SS, 6-speed with 4.10's, Pacesetter long tubes, ORY pipe, Magnaflow 14419 w/FM merge, forged TMS 370 LQ9, TSP stage 2.5/5.3 (862) heads, TMS custom cam, Fast 90 intake and TB, SLP lid, ASP UD crank pulley, SSRA, LS2/LS6 MAF, Detroit Truetrack with stock 10 bolt, custom tune, NX wet kit w/125 shot, chrome ZR1 rims with BFG dr's
mrtstang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:34 PM   #13
ChalknCover
Sgt. Killjoy
 
ChalknCover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Vehicle: 04 Tahoe
Location: DMV
Posts: 2,090
Default

Mods listed is what I am looking at. I don't see anything that other than the gears and midpipe that would give him anything extra. I see the 10 getting this one.

That was a pretty good vid though it does matter who is driving.
__________________


ChalknCover is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:42 PM   #14
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2005 cadillac cts
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bolton3valve View Post
na its not that big of a diffrence stick new edges are high 13 cars
didn't know that, my mistake.
swat 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 02:54 PM   #15
72MachOne99GT
2010 Blue Ball Award Recipient
 
72MachOne99GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Vehicle: 1999 Ford Mustang GT
Location: Eskimo Village, Indiana *No Igloo*
Posts: 7,893
Send a message via AIM to 72MachOne99GT Send a message via Yahoo to 72MachOne99GT
Default

The OP's car is a mid 13 second car with a set of DR's and a competent driver.

Thats close enough to ET about the same as a 'fair to average' driver in a '05-'10...

Having said that, it's the 2010 Drivers race to win or lose...but not by a whole lot..

unless you're talking about roll racing...then it's ugly early.
__________________
Grabber Blue 2013 GT500
Base w/ Recaros
72MachOne99GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:17 PM   #16
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang GT
Location: Jersey
Posts: 10,737
ItsUrFuneral
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.

I agree. I'm pretty sure the "AVERAGE" for a 2010 Mustang would be in the 13.8 range. I think 14.2 is a fair average for the new edge. It'll take a pretty good driver to run in the high 13s for a completely stock new edge. Very similar to stock SRT-4 times. Good drivers can do it but most kids run low to mid 14s.
__________________
ENGINE363 forged dart engine. 300 shot!TRANNY C4 with trans brake, 3800 stall, 9in. raceconverter, hurst shifter REAR Moser 35 spline kit with spool, FRPP 3.73 gearsSUSPENION UPR Upper & lower control arms, Strange 10 way dampers, coilovers up front, BBK sub frame connectors, UPR Tube K-member & A-arms NEW Mustang TIMES COMING.
2011 Camaro SS 12.34@110.92

Last edited by bluebeastsrt; 01-14-2010 at 03:22 PM.
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:23 PM   #17
83gtragtop
5th Gear Member
 
83gtragtop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Vehicle: 1983 Mustang GT Vert, 2011 Mustang 3.7L
Location: DTLA, CA
Posts: 4,883
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt View Post

I agree. I'm pretty sure the "AVERAGE" for a 2010 Mustang would be in the 13.8 range. I think 14.2 is a fair average for the new edge. It'll take a pretty good driver to run in the high 13s. Very similar to stock SRT-4 times. Good drivers can do it but most kids run low to mid 14s.
I concur.
83gtragtop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 03:56 PM   #18
swat 79
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2005 cadillac cts
Location: Nj
Posts: 469
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 83gtragtop View Post
Averages for a 2010 will be nowhere near 13.3! The fastest anyone ran in a stock '05/'09 3v was 13.27 I believe. 15hp is not going to change that by much.


15 hp maybe not, but with the 3.73 rear axle, 13.3 is not impossible by any means, and if you factor in the track pack, low low 13's is very possible. Don't discount the minor suspension components either, they help out a good bit (both stock, and with the track pack option)


13.8 as an average for a 2010? Respectfully man, that's just ridiculous. I know you know your ****, but if magazines are running consistent 13.5's, think about someone who actually owns the car and has a chance to get to the track often.
swat 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:30 PM   #19
SilverGT03
3rd Gear Member
 
SilverGT03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Vehicle: 2003 Mustang GT
Location: Wellington, Florida
Posts: 602
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by swat 79 View Post
15 hp maybe not, but with the 3.73 rear axle, 13.3 is not impossible by any means, and if you factor in the track pack, low low 13's is very possible. Don't discount the minor suspension components either, they help out a good bit (both stock, and with the track pack option)


13.8 as an average for a 2010? Respectfully man, that's just ridiculous. I know you know your ****, but if magazines are running consistent 13.5's, think about someone who actually owns the car and has a chance to get to the track often.
Magazines are going to be a lot different then your typical guy at the track. Some will do better than that 13.5 but I bet 8 out of 10 people would run around the 13.8 area as stated above.

And sorry It took so long for me to respond guys, I had a full day of classes..
I do plan on getting a set of cms stage II cams or stage II comp cams sometime over the summer so I figure that will help a good amount =)
__________________
*FRPP 4.10s
*FRPP 31 Spline T-lok
*Moser 31 Spline Axles
*O/R H
*Flowmaster 40 Mufflers
*JLT CAI
*Xcal 3
*Steeda Tri-ax
Lowered with some appearance goodies
SilverGT03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:43 PM   #20
Fobra
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location:
Posts: 4,064
Default

It seems to me that most mag tests are pretty good average driver real world numbers.
Fobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2010, 04:43 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
bench, mustangforums, racers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:54 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup