Go Back   MustangForums.com > Speed Zone > Street/Strip > The Racers Bench
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!

Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2012, 10:08 AM   #11
z28th1s
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Vehicle: 2011 Mustang 3.7 V6
Location: VA
Posts: 426
Default

1. 392 SRT8 (if it is an automatic)
2. '11+ 5.0
3-5. Too close to call
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
__________________
'93 Mustang GT Hatchback: 347, Novi 2000, Tremec TKO 600, too much to list. 7.08 @ 102.3 MPH with a 1.697 60' in the 1/8 mile on the first 'shakedown' pass. Better times coming next Spring.

2011 Mustang V6 Coupe: 3.7, M6, 3.73's, JLT CAI, BBK TB, Lund tune, BBK LT's, O/R X-pipe, Flowmaster 'Force II' axleback, 305 RWHP & 280 RWTQ, 12.63 @ 108.86 MPH (1st NA 3.7 V6 in the 12's)
z28th1s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 11:27 AM   #12
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Vehicle: 1995 mustang GT
Location: Jersey
Posts: 10,502
ItsUrFuneral
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
Only thing I would add is the auto 392 cars are a lot stronger than the manuals so I would put them equal if not above the 5.0.
Could be. I've never seen a SRT-8 Chally run yet. Had to use magazine numbers for the top 2. I've seen a ton of 5.0s run in the past year and they are every bit as strong as their magazine numbers as far as trap speed is concerned. Anybody that owns a chally that will lend it to me I'll be happy to test it out for ya.
__________________
ENGINE363 fully forged dart engine on the way with more spray!TRANNY C4 with trans brake, 3800 stall, 9in. raceconverter, hurst shifter REAR Moser 35 spline kit with spool, FRPP 3.73 gearsSUSPENION UPR pro street Uppers & lower control arms, Strange 10 way dampers, coilovers up front, BBK sub frame connectors, UPR Tube K-member & A-arms10.57@123.9 (OLD 5.0)
2011 CamaroSS 12.34@110.92
bluebeastsrt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 12:48 PM   #13
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 10,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
3.23s came on the z28 (they had option) and only those poor 2.73 geared guys get shafted, the rest of us got aluminum.
Ohhh, gotcha. I think you've actually told me that before, lol.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
Tune/Intake/Spintech Mufflers
JBA Mid-pipe/Pypes X-box
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 05:54 PM   #14
S8ER01Z
6th Gear Member
 
S8ER01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 2001 Camaro Z28
Location: IL
Posts: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt View Post
Could be. I've never seen a SRT-8 Chally run yet. Had to use magazine numbers for the top 2. I've seen a ton of 5.0s run in the past year and they are every bit as strong as their magazine numbers as far as trap speed is concerned. Anybody that owns a chally that will lend it to me I'll be happy to test it out for ya.
Theres a 12.2 @ 113 stock pass on the 392s with numerous guys a tenth or two slower. They are moving out well, manual record is 12.7 @ 110 though.
__________________
2001 Z28 M6 (LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, FRA/MTI Lid)
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 05:55 PM   #15
S8ER01Z
6th Gear Member
 
S8ER01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Vehicle: 2001 Camaro Z28
Location: IL
Posts: 5,548
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Ohhh, gotcha. I think you've actually told me that before, lol.
All good, I'm sure I repeat myself a lot.
__________________
2001 Z28 M6 (LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, FRA/MTI Lid)
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 06:02 PM   #16
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 96, Gt
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

I think the first place would be a battle between the 5.0 and the 392 dodge but would most likely come down to driver race.

Looks like they were tested by a few magazines at high 12s at a little over 110 mph which around here is about what the 5.0s go.

Ive seen the 5.0s do mid 12s stock though.
__________________
Vortech PI 4.6, built 4r70w with 3800 stall, 385 rwhp
11.35 @ 121 1.65 60

Turbo
541/560 15 psi
10.77@132 1.78 60
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 06:08 PM   #17
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 10,964
Default

Just looking at trap speeds between the 392 and 5.0, it looks like the 392 has a little more top end.


edit....just saw your post skater, regarding the 392 making a stock 12.2 113mph pass. I don't see a 5.0 touching that without a tune.
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
Tune/Intake/Spintech Mufflers
JBA Mid-pipe/Pypes X-box
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'

Last edited by Stone629; 02-19-2012 at 06:11 PM.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 08:06 PM   #18
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 96, Gt
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Just looking at trap speeds between the 392 and 5.0, it looks like the 392 has a little more top end.


edit....just saw your post skater, regarding the 392 making a stock 12.2 113mph pass. I don't see a 5.0 touching that without a tune.

I searched for about 10 seconds and found this for a new 5.0

Stock tires. Full weight. Full tank of gas. 0 mods.

12.223@115.18


Im sure there are guys who have done that, if not better.
__________________
Vortech PI 4.6, built 4r70w with 3800 stall, 385 rwhp
11.35 @ 121 1.65 60

Turbo
541/560 15 psi
10.77@132 1.78 60
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 08:17 PM   #19
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Vehicle: 2006 GTO
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 10,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
I searched for about 10 seconds and found this for a new 5.0

Stock tires. Full weight. Full tank of gas. 0 mods.

12.223@115.18


Im sure there are guys who have done that, if not better.
Source?
__________________
2006 GTO, 6-speed
Tune/Intake/Spintech Mufflers
JBA Mid-pipe/Pypes X-box
373 RWHP/373 RWTQ
12.91@111 MPH 2.1 60'
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 08:47 PM   #20
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Vehicle: 2003 Ford Mustang GT
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 9,787
Default

Just asking.. I've seen alot of vids of Cobra vs 5.0 but both cars had some type of mod (Cobra-smaller pulley etc.,, 5.0 Cai, tune etc.,). What do you guys think about that match up (stock 5.0 vs 03 Cobra)? Damn I'm jacking my own thread, lol!
__________________



Vortech V-1 T Trim SC (intercooled)
HP 292 cams
Teksid Forged Short Block 433 RWHP/390 RWTQ 3.33 pulley
New Project: MMR 900 Shortblock/2.87 pulley/465 RWHP or bust!

Last edited by Soldier GT; 02-19-2012 at 08:52 PM.
Soldier GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 08:47 PM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Tags
1222311518, 14, 2012, 302, 60, beat, boss, camaro, challenger, forum, gt, gto, mustang, srt, stock, time

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:20 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.


This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup