Stock for Stock which is faster?? - Page 2 - MustangForums.com



The Racers Bench Is the track just too much for you? Want to know what will beat what? Talk about it here!!
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-19-2012, 09:08 AM   #11
z28th1s
2nd Gear Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: VA
Posts: 426
Default

1. 392 SRT8 (if it is an automatic)
2. '11+ 5.0
3-5. Too close to call
z28th1s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 10:27 AM   #12
bluebeastsrt
6th Gear Member
 
bluebeastsrt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Jersey
Posts: 11,541
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
Only thing I would add is the auto 392 cars are a lot stronger than the manuals so I would put them equal if not above the 5.0.
Could be. I've never seen a SRT-8 Chally run yet. Had to use magazine numbers for the top 2. I've seen a ton of 5.0s run in the past year and they are every bit as strong as their magazine numbers as far as trap speed is concerned. Anybody that owns a chally that will lend it to me I'll be happy to test it out for ya.
bluebeastsrt is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 11:48 AM   #13
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
3.23s came on the z28 (they had option) and only those poor 2.73 geared guys get shafted, the rest of us got aluminum.
Ohhh, gotcha. I think you've actually told me that before, lol.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 04:54 PM   #14
S8ER01Z
6th Gear Member
 
S8ER01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 5,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebeastsrt View Post
Could be. I've never seen a SRT-8 Chally run yet. Had to use magazine numbers for the top 2. I've seen a ton of 5.0s run in the past year and they are every bit as strong as their magazine numbers as far as trap speed is concerned. Anybody that owns a chally that will lend it to me I'll be happy to test it out for ya.
Theres a 12.2 @ 113 stock pass on the 392s with numerous guys a tenth or two slower. They are moving out well, manual record is 12.7 @ 110 though.
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 04:55 PM   #15
S8ER01Z
6th Gear Member
 
S8ER01Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: IL
Posts: 5,559
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Ohhh, gotcha. I think you've actually told me that before, lol.
All good, I'm sure I repeat myself a lot.
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 05:02 PM   #16
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

I think the first place would be a battle between the 5.0 and the 392 dodge but would most likely come down to driver race.

Looks like they were tested by a few magazines at high 12s at a little over 110 mph which around here is about what the 5.0s go.

Ive seen the 5.0s do mid 12s stock though.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 05:08 PM   #17
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,294
Default

Just looking at trap speeds between the 392 and 5.0, it looks like the 392 has a little more top end.


edit....just saw your post skater, regarding the 392 making a stock 12.2 113mph pass. I don't see a 5.0 touching that without a tune.

Last edited by Stone629; 02-19-2012 at 05:11 PM.
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 07:06 PM   #18
justinschmidt1
4th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stone629 View Post
Just looking at trap speeds between the 392 and 5.0, it looks like the 392 has a little more top end.


edit....just saw your post skater, regarding the 392 making a stock 12.2 113mph pass. I don't see a 5.0 touching that without a tune.

I searched for about 10 seconds and found this for a new 5.0

Stock tires. Full weight. Full tank of gas. 0 mods.

12.223@115.18


Im sure there are guys who have done that, if not better.
justinschmidt1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 07:17 PM   #19
Stone629
6th Gear Member
 
Stone629's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,294
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by justinschmidt1 View Post
I searched for about 10 seconds and found this for a new 5.0

Stock tires. Full weight. Full tank of gas. 0 mods.

12.223@115.18


Im sure there are guys who have done that, if not better.
Source?
Stone629 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2012, 07:47 PM   #20
Soldier GT
6th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Soldier GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: MO/ Born and raised in Louisiana
Posts: 10,693
Default

Just asking.. I've seen alot of vids of Cobra vs 5.0 but both cars had some type of mod (Cobra-smaller pulley etc.,, 5.0 Cai, tune etc.,). What do you guys think about that match up (stock 5.0 vs 03 Cobra)? Damn I'm jacking my own thread, lol!

Last edited by Soldier GT; 02-19-2012 at 07:52 PM.
Soldier GT is offline   Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Mustang Doc Captures Fighting Spirit of American Icon MustangForums Editor Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion 1 10-05-2015 06:07 PM
What is this terrible sound coming from my rear axle? KingRando 2005-2014 Mustangs 22 10-01-2015 11:16 AM
Pinion angle, poly bushings, 1 piece DS mtgldr S197 Handling Section 1 09-10-2015 09:43 PM
Happy with new Steeda suspension on my 2010 GT robjh22 Suspension 0 09-08-2015 12:47 PM
Noise when turnning left Jose Corretjer New Member Area 2 09-08-2015 06:32 AM


Tags
1222311518, 14, 2012, 302, 60, beat, boss, camaro, challenger, forum, gt, gto, mustang, srt, stock, time

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.