cobra vs a zl1?
09-06-2012, 09:20 AM
#11
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 5,565
yup thats the guy 72. i just talked to my buddy again and i guess that wasn't even his car he was using it thru gm or some ****? i dunno, lots of different stories from everyone i talk to about it lol.
but anyways, i agree stone, i still think a 116 trap seems pretty low for the power. but then again ya never know. they dyno almost 500 at the wheels, and weighing close to 4k lbs(this correct?) i guess it could be right.
but anyways, i agree stone, i still think a 116 trap seems pretty low for the power. but then again ya never know. they dyno almost 500 at the wheels, and weighing close to 4k lbs(this correct?) i guess it could be right.
09-06-2012, 10:08 AM
#12
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 396
Id rather buy an ss and dump a little bit of money into it and run 10s...just my opinion.
*Edit - Greddy, what are you trapping?
09-06-2012, 12:52 PM
#15
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
I just don't get it. You wouldn't try to turn a 350lb chick into an olympic gymnast, so why try to turn +4k lb cars into handlers or straight line cars? Dodge or GM could've dropped 800lbs off there original concepts, made 100 less HP and achieved better results. Ford has the right idea.
09-06-2012, 12:56 PM
#16
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Delawere
Posts: 1,334
I just don't get it. You wouldn't try to turn a 350lb chick into an olympic gymnast, so why try to turn +4k lb cars into handlers or straight line cars? Dodge or GM could've dropped 800lbs off there original concepts, made 100 less HP and achieved better results. Ford has the right idea.
09-06-2012, 04:45 PM
#17
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 11,302
