Search



Go Back   MustangForums.com > Ford Mustang Tech > V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters
Sponsored by Optima Batteries


Welcome to Mustang Forums!
Welcome to Mustang Forums.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!


Reply
 
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-16-2006, 01:42 AM   #1
90mustangkid
1st Gear Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: 90 Ford Mustang
Location: GA
Posts: 118
Send a message via AIM to 90mustangkid
Default 5.0??

ok... ive been talking with my dad and my neighbor about getting a bigger engine like maybe a 351 cleveland or a 302.. well my neighbor has a spare engine that me and my dad could rebuild but heres the thing... gas prices are really expencive and i donno how much miles to the gallon does andone know... and is there anything i can do to add more horse power yo the 302 and still get decent gass mileage?
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Mustang Forums!
90mustangkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 01:43 AM   #2
product1620
1st Gear Member
 
product1620's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 69
Default RE: 5.0??

don't get a clevelend, if you want a 351 then get a windsor.
__________________
98 Mustang GT
Mods: Stuff
"I may be slow, but i'm ahead of you!"
product1620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 01:44 AM   #3
product1620
1st Gear Member
 
product1620's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 69
Default RE: 5.0??

Oh, an intake might help your gas mialege a little.
__________________
98 Mustang GT
Mods: Stuff
"I may be slow, but i'm ahead of you!"
product1620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 01:45 AM   #4
jthorn9
The Godfather

 
jthorn9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Vehicle: 2008 Mustang GT
Location: College Station, Texas
Posts: 15,374
Jeremy Thorner jthorn9
Default RE: 5.0??

Cai, pulleys, aftermarket exhaust. 5.0s get 16 city, and 20-24 hwy. I say get a 4.6L, but if you insist, then the 5.0 will do. This isn't a 5.0 drop question is it? You are going to buy a Mustang 5.0 right, and not do a V6 yo V8 swap, because if it's the swap you'd be better off, by a lot, buying an old 5.0 and rebuilding it.
__________________
13 Mustang GT CS - 380 RWHP, 370 TQ
13 Mustang V6 Pony Package - 270 RWHP, 260 TQ

08 Mustang GT - 285 RWHP, 305 TQ (sold)
99 Mustang SVT Cobra - 280 RWHP, 290 TQ (sold)
11 Mustang V6 - 270 RWHP, 260 TQ (sold)
95 Mustang Cobra - N/A 250 RWHP, 275 TQ; S/C 400 RWHP, 400 TQ (sold)
97 Mustang GT - 190 RWHP, 250 TQ (sold)
00 Mustang V6 - 145 RWHP, 184 TQ (sold)
98 Mustang V6 - 125 RWHP, 210 TQ (sold)
jthorn9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 01:48 AM   #5
product1620
1st Gear Member
 
product1620's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 69
Default RE: 5.0??

Well, if hes thinking about a 351 then he probably wants to go carb'd, and if thats the case the swap would be a little easier and more cost effective.
__________________
98 Mustang GT
Mods: Stuff
"I may be slow, but i'm ahead of you!"
product1620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 02:18 AM   #6
90mustangkid
1st Gear Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: 90 Ford Mustang
Location: GA
Posts: 118
Send a message via AIM to 90mustangkid
Default RE: 5.0??


Quote:
ORIGINAL: product1620

don't get a clevelend, if you want a 351 then get a windsor.
but the windsor was a van motor and the clevelend was build better
90mustangkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 02:19 AM   #7
90mustangkid
1st Gear Member

 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Vehicle: 90 Ford Mustang
Location: GA
Posts: 118
Send a message via AIM to 90mustangkid
Default RE: 5.0??

yah im thinking of getting a 5.0
90mustangkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 02:50 AM   #8
product1620
1st Gear Member
 
product1620's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Scranton, PA
Posts: 69
Default RE: 5.0??

The windsor is a stroked 302; the blocks are the same so It would be the same to swap in a windsor as it would to swap in a 302 provided you have the accesorys for a 302 mustang. The widsors make a lot of power and are very reliable which is probably why they used them in the big vans and box trucks; Iv'e seen those engines with 200,000+ miles and still chuggin. The cleavlend is a big block, so i'm not even sure if it will fit in a foxstang without modification. And if i'm not mistaken I think the windsor made more power than the clevelend, but the clevelend made more torque.
__________________
98 Mustang GT
Mods: Stuff
"I may be slow, but i'm ahead of you!"
product1620 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 04:42 AM   #9
Jugador
5th Gear Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Bangladesh
Posts: 4,836
Default RE: 5.0??

Quote:
ORIGINAL: product1620

The windsor is a stroked 302; the blocks are the same so It would be the same to swap in a windsor as it would to swap in a 302 provided you have the accesorys for a 302 mustang. The widsors make a lot of power and are very reliable which is probably why they used them in the big vans and box trucks; Iv'e seen those engines with 200,000+ miles and still chuggin. The cleavlend is a big block, so i'm not even sure if it will fit in a foxstang without modification. And if i'm not mistaken I think the windsor made more power than the clevelend, but the clevelend made more torque.

wrong. the 351 block is wider at the top than 302. there are many common parts between 302 and 351 windsors (such as heads, upper intakes for fuel injected motors, and other stuff), but the block is not the same. clevelands can fit with some work, but i would go 351w for the aftermarket. you'd need swap motor mounts to lower the engine or get a taller hood, swap headers, and like said, accessories. if going carb you'd also need ignition, a low pressure fuel pump (probably a mechanical one), and you'd pretty much be in business with some other details worked out such as rear end, transmission, brakes, and suspension should you choose to upgrade it. if you have specific questions, we have a 351 section which can be found here http://www.mustangforums.com/forumid_257/tt.htm
__________________
by the time you've finished reading this sentence, you'll realize you wasted like 5 seconds of your life
Jugador is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 05:43 AM   #10
03YellowPony
6th Gear Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location:
Posts: 7,445
Default RE: 5.0??

Get the Windsor and put 302 heads on it. That will raise the compression ratio..giving you better power and still be a little fuel efficient.
__________________
Sound clip http://h1.ripway.com/03YellowPony/S4300181.WAV
Sally's gone..
the REAL RedAss



MFFDTC #7
MFI#6
03YellowPony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2006, 05:43 AM
MustangForums
Ford Mustang




Paid Advertisement

 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pics of your rides. THUMPIN455 Classic Mustang General Discussion 1097 08-29-2014 08:11 AM
Bad Boys of the 5.0 Section code3GT 5.0L General Discussion 81 02-14-2011 11:26 PM

Advertising

Featured Sponsors
Vendor Directory
New Sponsors
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.

© Internet Brands, Inc.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
Emails Backup