V6 (1994-2004) Mustangs Technical discussions on the 3.8L and 3.9L V6 torque monsters

Pacesetter longtube headers

Old 12-29-2012, 08:48 PM
  #11  
RyansQuick6
Reverse Gear Member
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 8,130
Default

Originally Posted by johngt10
Hate to say it but I think flows probably give the best sound on a v6 and I hate flows but my buddy has a 2011 v6 with flows and lt's with off-road x-pipe. It's sounds better than most but its still going to sound like a loud v6 no matter what you install.
Completely dfifferent engine, so of course it sounds different.
RyansQuick6 is offline  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:19 PM
  #12  
ESG-642T
Buyer Beware
 
ESG-642T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,586
Default

Flow's also sound best on the 94-04 , the original 40s
Magnaflow's sound rice burner as well.
ESG-642T is offline  
Old 12-29-2012, 11:20 PM
  #13  
stauber32
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
stauber32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: ARIZONA
Posts: 71
Default

I love the rumble of the loudmouths! Actually, i was asked today if i had a v8 in my stang. I had to sadly answer no. BUT it does sound awesome until high rpms when it sounds like im driving a civic.

I cant afford the MAC lts, so im looking at the pacesetter lts.
http://www.jegs.com/i/Pace-Setter/76...rentProductId=

im not sure whether that would make more raspy, or should i had more cats like.
http://www.jegs.com/webapp/wcs/store...p:OrderItemAdd


Currently i have the stock headers, magnaflow high flow cats, and now the slp loudmouths.
stauber32 is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 08:15 AM
  #14  
johngt10
2nd Gear Member
 
johngt10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 346
Default

Originally Posted by RyansQuick6
Completely dfifferent engine, so of course it sounds different.
I know its a completely different engine. I meant as its not going to have the sound of a v8. Imo every v6 in that year I have heard driving down the road with either and exhaust or no exhaust they both are an annoyance. Not hating on the v6 because I owned one for 8 years. I thought it sounded ok but it was annoying when it was above 1000 rpms.
johngt10 is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 02:13 PM
  #15  
RyansQuick6
Reverse Gear Member
 
RyansQuick6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 8,130
Default

Originally Posted by johngt10
I know its a completely different engine. I meant as its not going to have the sound of a v8. Imo every v6 in that year I have heard driving down the road with either and exhaust or no exhaust they both are an annoyance. Not hating on the v6 because I owned one for 8 years. I thought it sounded ok but it was annoying when it was above 1000 rpms.
A cam does some amazing things for the sound of a V6 too lol.
RyansQuick6 is offline  
Old 12-30-2012, 03:46 PM
  #16  
johngt10
2nd Gear Member
 
johngt10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: TX
Posts: 346
Default

Originally Posted by RyansQuick6
A cam does some amazing things for the sound of a V6 too lol.
Yeah I had a cam in my 3rd gen camaro. It had a 3.1l slow as ***** but it sounded great at idle. Had a few rednecks ask if I had a big block or a 383 stroker, I reply with nope just a 3.1l and they give a blank stare lol. I enjoy my gt more but I probably should have kept the turdgen for a side project.
johngt10 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GimpyHSHS
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
19
12-19-2023 01:12 PM
Roxon68
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
17
03-17-2016 08:13 PM
junior04
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
1
09-28-2015 10:53 AM
trashxtrash
4.6L (1996-2004 Modular) Mustang
4
09-20-2015 10:49 PM
BrantleyS550
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
0
09-14-2015 04:18 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Pacesetter longtube headers



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:30 PM.