xX98StallionXx

No, because you cant have a carb in newer model cars... or at least thats my understanding from some law i read i think.. maybe its just Washington emission crap.. But Sleeper is right, its exactly what i need.. im tired of this electrical stuff thats slowing my progress. And i believe my friend has a 305 but im not sure, reguardless hes still lookin for more power.

jthorn9

Well, remember, you still have a lot of tinering to do with a carb, which will make it a little easier, but not much. In other words, you trade in the software for a screwdriver and lots of patience.

xX98StallionXx

well as long as i can do it myself, ill put up some links of what im looking at, and what i have inquired about.

1969 Mustang
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327310735.html

1969 Chevelle 4dr
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/car/326592010.html

1976 Camaro (possible body damage? i emailed seller)
http://seattle.craigslist.org/sno/car/326242965.html

1976 Camaro (emailed seller about this one too)
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/325046897.html

1968 Lemans (for a GTO clone)
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/car/327707210.html

I figure if i sell my car for 4000 ish, i should have money left over and money saved from workingfor the car, insurance and gas

jthorn9

Come on Josh, we're lazy, make thos links work.

xX98StallionXx

there.. lol

nanaki

good luck getting 4k for that car. unless you have really low miles, it ain't happenin.

xX98StallionXx

76,000. and thanks, i will get it for 4K+.....
Updated list

1971 Camaro
http://seattle.craigslist.org/see/car/327231988.html
1978 Camaro (Its got a bad color but im going to repaint it black with white stripes.)
http://seattle.craigslist.org/skc/car/326805693.html

jthorn9

Boy, oh boy, going for the classics right off the bat. Plain and simple here, all of those cars, while OK, are restoration project cars, not something intended to be on the road day in and day out. I would just take a guestimation to say that to get the Mustang restored enough to drive everyday would cost around 10K, the Camaro (fugly as hell to me) about 10-15K, and the other two, I have no idea asto what to guess. Probles with those cars is gonna first off be the rust, then as a side job the paint would have to be done after the rust is fixed so you don't look like an *** driving down the street. Then you're on to fixing up the engine and tranny, not to modify, just to keep it running. Serriously, classic cars require a lot of time, money, and effort to keep them running and to get them to streetable status. Also, while all of those cars may be decently quick their handleing is gonna suck royal *****. You're gonna have to do some very nice suspension upgrades just so you can control the car in and out of turns.

jthorn9

The 71 looks good, but will need some major interior restoration, and the body will also need some work in the engine bay, and god knows where else.

The other Camaro doesn't look bad, but with only two pics advertising the body and not the rest of the car, I'd be worried.

jthorn9

Here are a couple I found, not as cheap, but won't need nearly as much work.

1995 5.0L White, 110,000 miles.
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327661042.html

1996 Mustang GT, Green[:'(]127,000 miles[&:]
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/324269654.html

1988 Mustang LX 5.0L
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327782397.html

1999 Mustang GT
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/324055738.html

1995 Camaro Z-28
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327696868.html

1982 Camaro Z-28
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327625594.html

1996 Mustang GT
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/327249570.html

And my favorite 1998 Mustang GT
http://seattle.craigslist.org/tac/car/324451520.html