You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join our community today!
Let's put it this way, real world RWHP numbers on their M112 based V8 as reported by customers using it (not their website) where less than my V6 at the same psi.
__________________
~Matt Race car: 2000 Roush #5004 Shark hauler: 2001 Explorer Sport 4.0L Show car: 1970 Mach 1 351
Tork Tech uses an Eaton compressor as well. The TT design is pure crap. No power and way too much money for what you get.
The TT design is VERY well thought out. The S/C sits a bit forward so it has a huge intake plenum. Comes with a new single blade throttle body. Has a secondary pulley (lower) and runs an 8 rib belt system. A dual flow (under the charger) I/C. Lowered temps by 30 degrees. A huge front mount. Look at you tube...team JDM has done them, Modular Depot, JMS Chip, all good reports on customer cars. At 8 pound around 400 rwhp. The BONE stock 2003 that was done for Superfords hit 406 x 437 rwt. Had to be de-tuned. Now with a new manifold top plate you can slap on a TVS 1900 and get 700 rwhp. You would need to buy a complete KB for that upgrade. They have a ton of flexibility and room for growth without re-investing 6 or 7 grand. BTW, as far as a new hood, if you read the KB fine print, if you upgrade to an 8 rib system, guess what..$700.00 plus you also need a new hood.
Well, lets see the dyno sheets. I got mine here. I want to see a BONE stock V6, make more power than a GT. BTW, what is this psi stuff. Are we talking boost levels? If so, boost is all relative, depending on restrictions. You could read 8 pounds on one set up, improve the intake runners and exhaust manifolds and boost will drop. Less restriction. The GT went 12.77 at 112 on street tires.
WTF, Bone stock V6 make more than a GT? What pipe are you smoking? (Maybe it's just worded wrong.)
I said V6 vs V8 with the M112.
The Tork Tech set up makes the same power on a 4.6L GT as the Hammerhead set up can on the V6. And it's WAY over priced for the numbers the cars put down when comparing it to other blowers for the 4.6L SOHC.
And yes, we all know boost is a measure of resistance. I was using it to compare the flow charactoristics between the two motors.
For the $4,700 the TT sells for, you're GT better run faster than a 12 second quarter.
For the $2,400 for the V6 version of the M112, you can run faster than that. I think the time was 11.9 on a stock V6 with the M112 (yes, street tires). I'll have to double check to confirm that number.
__________________
~Matt Race car: 2000 Roush #5004 Shark hauler: 2001 Explorer Sport 4.0L Show car: 1970 Mach 1 351
11.9 on a stock V6 with street tires and an M112, you sure Matt? I know its your kit and all but I've seen a few people with the kit with times in the 13's and 12's.
This forum is owned and operated by Internet Brands, Inc., a Delaware corporation. It is not authorized or endorsed by the Ford Motor Company and is not affiliated with the Ford Motor Company or its related companies in any way. Ford® is a registered trademark of the Ford Motor Company
