jcma

Hi, I am looking at a 2002 Mustang and while during my research, I came across this article and would like to know if this is still an issue.

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...30/mustang.htm

Thanks.

LilRoush

That info is not only wrong, but out dated.
The Mustang has always exceded Federal safety standards when it comes to rear.

Personally (as a street and track driver), I'm happy the fuel tank is in the back. I don't want it right under my butt if I were hit hard enough to have it catch fire. It's much safer back there than close to the passanger cabin and vulnerable to side impact. These cars take a front/rear hit much better than a side hit.