Mustang Forums   Mustang Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Calendars   Search   Live Chat   Contact MF   Sponsors
  Mustang Recalls   Mustang TSB's   News   Timeslips   Timeline   Wallpaper   Member List   Register   Login

Some things to consider with your 351 swap

  Printable Version
Mustang Forums >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 5.0 Mustang >> 351 Mustang >> Some things to consider with your 351 swap Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/19/2007 9:49:14 AM   
Jasperstang308



Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/9/2005
From: KY
Status: offline
guys here are a few articles i found that i saved on my computer when i was doing 351w swap research

347 vs. 351   If you’re considering extra cubes, then chances are you’re wrestling with a fairly common dilemma: Do you build a 347 out of your 5.0 or step all the way up to a 351? Perhaps the following info will help you decide.

351W: Advantages

•Strength:
The 351W block is stronger than the production 5.0 by a long shot. Thicker walls and 3-inch main, and 2.311-inch rod journals (versus 2.248/2.123 for the 5.0) are contributing factors.
• Taller Deck: The 351W features a deck height of 9.503 inches versus the 5.0’s 8.206 inches. This means a longer rod can be used for even more cubes—up to 435 with a production two-bolt block, and 454 cubes with a four-bolt FRPP block, according to George Klass at Coast High Performance.
• Rod-to-Stroke Ratio:
In stock configuration, the 351 has a better rod-to-stroke ratio than a 347 (1.70:1 for the 351W versus 1.58:1 for the 347) by virtue of its longer rods (5.956 versus 5.400 for the typical 347 rod). The 347 also features ½-inch head bolts instead of the 302 block’s 7/16-inch bolts.
351W: Disadvantages
• Size: The 351W is 2.250 inches wider than a 302, necessitating a number of changes (at additional cost) to make the swap possible. Hood clearance can become an issue, and there will be less room to service the plugs.
• Heavy Weight: As discussed in the Keep the Muscle, Lose the Fat sidebar, the 351W is beefier and is typically more than 100 pounds heavier than a 302-based engine.
347: Advantages

• 302-based: The 347 is created when a 302 block is bored 0.030 and fitted with a 3.400 stroke crank and custom rods/pistons. This means a 347 has the extra cubes you desire, yet it can still use the same headers, manifolds, brackets, and so on as a stock 302.
• Light Weight:
The 302-based engine is more than 100 pounds lighter than the 351 in stock form, and it can be made downright feathery with a few aluminum components.
347: Disadvantages (and perceived disadvantages)
• Limited Growth: While 347 ci is certainly a respectable number, it’s the practical displacement limit for a two-bolt-main production block.
• Limited Strength: A two-bolt-main production block is typically capable of withstanding up to 600 hp, and that’s with a girdle, studded mains, and so on. Even a mildly built 347 with a supercharger can bust that figure. An R302 block will solve the problem, but there goes your budget.
• Poor Rod-to-Stroke Ratio (perceived):
There has been a lot of talk about the 347’s rod-to-stroke (R/S) ratio. Simply stated, the R/S ratio is the length of the connecting rod (center-to-center) versus stroke of the engine. A higher ratio means the piston stays at top dead center longer, promoting better combustion and, theoretically, more power. Compared to the 351W’s 1.70:1 R/S ratio, the typical 347’s R/S ratio of 1.58:1 doesn’t look good, but it’s actually better than a lot of other noted performance engines, including the 454 big-block Chevy (1.53:1) and 400 small-block Chevy (1.48:1). Even the legendary 428 CJ was only marginally better than a 347 at 1.63:1. Unless you’re building an engine to compete with Billy Glidden, R/S ratio really doesn’t add up to much in an otherwise well-built engine.

Cost Factor
The next thing you’d probably like to know is, which would be cheaper, a 347 or a 351W? As discussed, the 351W requires numerous extra parts to accomplish the swap, while the 347 doesn’t. However, depending on what 347 kit you purchase, the initial short-block may be more expensive than a 351W. Since we can’t know what combo you have planned, the best idea is to add up the cost of a 351W, factor in the extra parts, and then compare that to the cost of the 347, keeping in mind both engines can use the same heads. Our guess is that the 347 will probably be less, but depending on how serious you plan to get, a 351W swap could be equal to, or less than, the cost of a truly serious 347.

i found it on the 50mustang and super fords website i believe


< Message edited by Jasperstang308 -- 11/19/2007 9:52:55 AM >


_____________________________

87 notch
a notch above the rest
crossed over to the dark side

+1 arent allowed in 50 tech sections

Post #: 1
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/19/2007 10:11:42 AM   
Force4

 

Posts: 528
Joined: 10/30/2005
Status: offline
Yea a 347 would have been nice but my 351w was just so damn cheap.  A stock swap from a 302 to a 351w dropped me 2.1 seconds in the QT for around a grand.  Cant get any better then that.

_____________________________


1983 Mustang GT, 357w, Edelbrock Top end Kit, 650 double pump, Magnum pro rockers, catless MAC full exhaust, 3:73's (8.8) with MT ET streets. B&M Short throw.

(in reply to Jasperstang308)
Post #: 2
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/19/2007 12:58:05 PM   
bighungrymatt


Posts: 3272
Joined: 7/25/2006
From: MISSISSIPPI
Status: offline
thats great information for someone consideration to stroke or swap...

_____________________________

1987 GT


"Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder"



(in reply to Force4)
Post #: 3
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/19/2007 5:40:45 PM   
kura


Posts: 317
Joined: 5/21/2007
Status: offline
Good stuff, Jasper! Info all in one convenient place :)

_____________________________

04 Comp Orange GT R.I.P.
95 Mustang GTS, 393w, TFS-r intake, spec3+, MSD, Carbonware 4" cowl, Bassani C/B, pypes o/r-x, tokico dspecs, authentic s281 silver wheels, smoked heads w/ hids, s351 tails, hurst, 255lph

(in reply to bighungrymatt)
Post #: 4
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/19/2007 11:03:08 PM   
Jasperstang308



Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/9/2005
From: KY
Status: offline
should i make a sticky?

_____________________________

87 notch
a notch above the rest
crossed over to the dark side

+1 arent allowed in 50 tech sections


(in reply to kura)
Post #: 5
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/20/2007 3:13:11 AM   
Stroked91

 

Posts: 337
Joined: 4/24/2007
Status: offline
it was good timing for this article to come up as i am currently think of doin a 351 swap

(in reply to Jasperstang308)
Post #: 6
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 11/20/2007 10:47:52 AM   
bighungrymatt


Posts: 3272
Joined: 7/25/2006
From: MISSISSIPPI
Status: offline
yea make it a sticky!

_____________________________

1987 GT


"Beauty is in the eye of the beer holder"



(in reply to Stroked91)
Post #: 7
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 2/28/2008 2:14:03 AM   
BlackBlurr19

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/28/2008
Status: offline
i have a 95 gt w a 302 but this summer i was planning a 351 swap and was wonderin a few things. could i use my stock eec and add a piggyback programer? where would i find a oil pan that will work? and will my stock t5 tranny hold up against the extra power/torque? its not goin to be a real hot motor bc its still a daily driver, itll still be efi w a healthy cam, gt40 heads and headers. who has headers for this swap? I love the previous 347vs351 info and im lookin forward to any info you can help me with.

_____________________________

95 gt blacked out and wide open!!!!

(in reply to Jasperstang308)
Post #: 8
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 2/28/2008 4:10:04 PM   
No Truck Like Ford

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 2/28/2008
Status: offline
I have a 1982 Mercury Capri RS that i am currently in the act of restoring for summer. it currently has 302 that is in excellant shape( i have taken it apart myself and everything is clean, also i have another 82' 302 out of a GT my dad used to own.) but i wanted to swap in a and 82' or 83' 351W that was in an older pickup with only about 40000 miles on it. And i was just wondering besides a new oil pan what i need to do get it in there. Im only a junior in high school so money is tight but my dad has every tool imaginable and a ton of parts from numerous ford mustangs and such. i also was wondering what heads, intake, cam, and headers would be good for this setup. It will be driven daily but will see time at Route 66 raceway on weekends. Any help would be extremely helpful so i can do it right.
Also, may be able to have access to a supercharger. And i was just wondering i would have to do to get that on there.

< Message edited by No Truck Like Ford -- 2/28/2008 4:11:43 PM >


_____________________________

1982 Mercury Capri RS

(in reply to BlackBlurr19)
Post #: 9
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 3/4/2008 11:08:26 PM   
BlackBlurr19

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/28/2008
Status: offline
hey i know this is a mustang website but sum1 mite be able to help me (hopefully)!!!!! i have an 85 full size bronco w a windsor and for sum reason every time i connect the "brain box" the voltage on the battery drops drastically and continues to fall at ab a tenth a volt per second. i checked the voltage regulator and i got a new box for it. the readout was ab 11.54 volts (it ran dead and never got fully recharged) but when i hookup the box it drops to ab 4 volts and continues to fall?!!! i dont know whats goin on, i thought a relay mounted by the brake booster was stickin but even w it unhooked it still falls. any1 please let me know if you know sumthin. thanks for bearin w me on this non mustang related ( but ford windsor ) question.

_____________________________

95 gt blacked out and wide open!!!!

(in reply to No Truck Like Ford)
Post #: 10
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 3/8/2008 11:54:50 PM   
Jasperstang308



Posts: 9722
Joined: 2/9/2005
From: KY
Status: offline
i dunno i wish i could help you more with thay question

here is for sn95's
http://www.mustang50magazine.com/techarticles/18818_351w_engine_swap/index.html



_____________________________

87 notch
a notch above the rest
crossed over to the dark side

+1 arent allowed in 50 tech sections


(in reply to BlackBlurr19)
Post #: 11
RE: Some things to consider with your 351 swap - 3/9/2008 9:55:30 PM   
BlackBlurr19

 

Posts: 12
Joined: 2/28/2008
Status: offline
    hey thanks for the site jasper! hey on my car the dome lights dont work. theyre ran throuth the alarm control box in the trunk, i swapped in my girlfriends outta her stang and they worked. does that box have to be out of a stang or could i just go to the junk yard and get one outta nething, say like a vic or sumthin, and if i do should i find one w the remotes w it or could i just give the dealership the num of the box and have them order sum? is it true that the 5.0 explorers have iron gt40 heads and a cobra style intake? thats what ive read on another site.

_____________________________

95 gt blacked out and wide open!!!!

(in reply to Jasperstang308)
Post #: 12
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 

 
Mustang Forum >> Ford Mustang Tech >> 5.0 Mustang >> 351 Mustang
Jump to:
Forum Rules & FAQ
Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
RSS Feeds
Make A Donation

Mustangs:
Classic Mustang
Mustang II
Fox Body Mustang
sn95 Mustang
New Edge Mustang
s197 Mustang
Mustang Clubs
2007 GT500 Mustang
2009 Mustang
Ford Mustang Prices


Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
pro50sc17752
nanaki14679
88bluegt14516
dan04cobra14505
addermk213830
ride of the 13601
hotrods_n_bo13285
2000gt4.612490
mustangman0211860
1slo8511634

New Vendors
BMR Fabrication
Year One
Auto Badges
Trickflow
Speedware Motorsports
LTM Global
Late Model Restoration
Southern Mustang Parts
4walls
BrandMotion

MustangForums.com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Ford Motor Company.