shelby taillights on s197
#35
Much better!
I was right, and it's because it's a one piece panel.
It's clean all the way across. The 67 tail lamps are actually better. Less crowded...
The GT/CS bumper would look much better than the one on that picture.
It's way too fat.
MELLOWYELLOW, that's what you want right there!
I was right, and it's because it's a one piece panel.
It's clean all the way across. The 67 tail lamps are actually better. Less crowded...
The GT/CS bumper would look much better than the one on that picture.
It's way too fat.
MELLOWYELLOW, that's what you want right there!
#36
I dunno...
It must be for someone who misses their SUV! The rear is like one big wall. Does the trunk look functional anymore?
And the chrome around the tail lights shouldn't come to a point like that. But I guess the import fan who designed those never saw photos of the real deal from 67?
Too bad because it looks like a clean mod too.
It must be for someone who misses their SUV! The rear is like one big wall. Does the trunk look functional anymore?
And the chrome around the tail lights shouldn't come to a point like that. But I guess the import fan who designed those never saw photos of the real deal from 67?
Too bad because it looks like a clean mod too.
#37
#38
I've posted this before...
The only way to pull this off right, is to have that tail section in one piece across the back.
Which means, extensive custom work on the trunk lid.
It has to be just like the 68 Shelby...
That particular car looks like *** with that ugly ducktail.
It's flat and too tall, yikes!
The only way to pull this off right, is to have that tail section in one piece across the back.
Which means, extensive custom work on the trunk lid.
It has to be just like the 68 Shelby...
That particular car looks like *** with that ugly ducktail.
It's flat and too tall, yikes!
#40
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MustangForums Editor
GT350 S550 Tech
1
09-29-2015 03:29 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM