View Poll Results : which looks better on a gt?
shelby gt500 front end
70.27%
Roush pumper vs. gt500 front
06-01-2011, 02:41 AM
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Cali
Posts: 85
06-01-2011, 05:45 AM
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: MA
Posts: 204
I am in the same conundrum. I can't decide between the 2, but the Roush front bumper is about half the cost of the GT500 front end.(I'm talking pre-painted roush front bumper vs non painted GT500 front end kit)
06-01-2011, 11:06 AM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Germantown, TN
Posts: 1,347
I like the GT500 much better, but a complete kit is 2K!!! So if you can afford the $$$ get the GT500! If not, Roush all the way!!!!
06-01-2011, 11:10 AM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,690
I'm in for the gt500 front end. Love mine and glad I went with it a few years ago.
06-01-2011, 01:44 PM
Join Date: May 2011
Location: California
Posts: 22
The car was designed with the Shelby front end in mind, but if you don't have the HP to back it up then get the Roush.
06-02-2011, 06:49 PM
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 71
^ I disagree. If you like the Shelby front end by all means buy it. Some owners prefer looks over speed.
06-02-2011, 07:01 PM
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ky
Posts: 467
The GT500 front is just plain Jane looking to me nothing special about it. Get what you think looks best though.
06-02-2011, 07:26 PM
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: michigan
Posts: 26
GT500!!!
06-02-2011, 09:43 PM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,674
I love both, but I'm digging the Roush a little more. It really is a win-win situation you're in.
06-02-2011, 09:44 PM
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,674
"Pumper" hahaha. Sorry, just noticed that.
06-01-2011, 05:45 AM
