Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mustang stigma

Old 03-30-2006, 04:46 PM
  #41  
Tracedaddy
4th Gear Member
 
Tracedaddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,415
Default RE: Mustang stigma

The article I was referring to is:

George Will


I think the point is that although it's more economical for foreign companies to establish factories in the US to produce vehicles sold in the US, a majority of their operations are still not located here. The additional costs incurred by those plants can be dlluted as part of the big picture.
Tracedaddy is offline  
Old 03-30-2006, 05:20 PM
  #42  
Black GT
4th Gear Member
 
Black GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,138
Default RE: Mustang stigma


ORIGINAL: Tracedaddy

The article I was referring to is:

George Will


I think the point is that although it's more economical for foreign companies to establish factories in the US to produce vehicles sold in the US, a majority of their operations are still not located here. The additional costs incurred by those plants can be dlluted as part of the big picture.
Thanks for the article.
Black GT is offline  
Old 03-30-2006, 06:01 PM
  #43  
JStang78
2nd Gear Member
 
JStang78's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 315
Default RE: Mustang stigma

Actually, it's not so much that they provide health insurance to their employees, but that the union's agreement provides that the companies pay such a high percentage of the premiums, and further, that those benefits are protected after retirement, not to mention the pensions that many former employees enjoy. So, while say, Toyota, may have an employer-sponsored health care program, they do not pay the same percentages toward that program that the American auto manufacturers do under the agreements that the American companies have with the union. Also, as is almost always the case when you allow someone to corner the market, as these unions largely have, I suspect there's some collusion going on that prevents GM and Ford from accepting competitive bids from insurers, instead forcing these companies to contract with some union-friendly health insurance provider (just my personal skepticism there). The costs of union labor, as a result of their past agreements and business practices, goes far beyond the immediate costs involved with current employees, but also to those who retired.

George Will is wrong, however, in saying that the money spent on health care diverted from, specifically, research into hybrid vehicles. That is at least partly the result of bad management and obstinence. Bob Lutz calls hybrid cars "bad business." No, I think the lag behind the Japanese in technology was more an approach to how the Koreans approached improving quality in their cars: let the Japanese do it and we can implement their changes without any of the R&D costs.
JStang78 is offline  
Old 03-31-2006, 01:17 PM
  #44  
RStone13
1st Gear Member
 
RStone13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Western Ma
Posts: 106
Default RE: Mustang stigma

You have a point & your very funny. LOL
It may cost a little more because of union workers. But they don't design it. They just put it together.
RStone13 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
Vendor For Sale / Group Buy Classifieds
5
11-09-2016 11:45 AM
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
03-18-2016 11:21 AM
MustangForums Editor
Mustang News, Concepts, Rumors & Discussion
8
01-06-2016 07:03 PM
chain
New Member Area
6
08-17-2015 08:52 AM
daytooday
Motor Swap Section
2
08-11-2015 09:22 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Mustang stigma



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.