Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Is there really power loss with LMs?

Old 10-12-2006, 03:22 PM
  #11  
Sn00ganS1337
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Sn00ganS1337's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 117
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

ORIGINAL: bl1nkage

There is a huge thread about this from a couple months ago where a few of the forums best car guys (who also happen to be engineers in one thing or another) say that backpressure isnt good and that straight pipes will almost always provide -more- power than chambered systems by allowing the exhaust to flow more freely, providing that the pipes dont get too large because then it will slow down the exit velocity. In other words, straighter, appropriately sized pipes, with less obstacles blocking the exiting of the exhaust fumes are optimal.

Personally I dont believe any axle backs will cause you to lose power, but at the same time it wont cause you to gain power either (under normal N/A conditions.) On a blown system it will certainly be a larger factor to have a more freely flowing exhaust setup.
very helpfull post! thank you. So it looks like I won't be losing any power with the LMs? Thanks to all for your input
Sn00ganS1337 is offline  
Old 10-12-2006, 05:37 PM
  #12  
555*
3rd Gear Member
 
555*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 716
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

A member on TMS claims they remember an article in MM & FF magazine that says they lost power when they put em on. Hes going to look for it.
555* is offline  
Old 10-13-2006, 08:30 AM
  #13  
MBDiagMan
3rd Gear Member
 
MBDiagMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North East Texas on the Red River
Posts: 886
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

In an MAF Fuel Injection car, any flow improvement or loss is automatically compensated for. Anyone who believes that improving exhaust flow will lose horsepower is probably an old school guy that put headers on his carbureted car without recalibrating the carburetor and indeed lost power. He lost the power because the headers leaned it out and he did not compensate for that.

In the case of our Mass Air Flow injection system, improved exhaust flow will be measured by the MAF and compensated for. NOW, that said, at wide open throttle you are running in open loop mode where the MAF and O2 measurement may not come into play, so a different tune will be necessary for your wide open throttle operation.

You don't get something for nothing.
MBDiagMan is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 10:26 PM
  #14  
BCM07CSGT
 
BCM07CSGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

Now I just installed Borla Axle Backs and I noticed a major decrease in power. I could smell something burning in the drivers side muffler. I put the OEM muff's back on and everything was fine. Thinking that something was wrong with the Borla muffs, I bought some Bassani Axle Backs... Same damn thing... Bogging...and burning smell...

The only other MOD I have is a GMS CAI w/MAF.

Anyone have this problem?

[IMG]local://upfiles/52246/AD8F2A350AA74B27A3807655C0A84F4C.jpg[/IMG]
BCM07CSGT is offline  
Old 10-22-2006, 11:13 PM
  #15  
mustangman02232
6th Gear Member
 
mustangman02232's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ludlow, Mass
Posts: 15,864
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

Backpreasure is bad, however, once you loose a certain velocity that the gases are flowing out then you loose power, the reason people think that you loose power is cause you gain HP, which is the top end, so your off the line stays the same but pulls harder up top, i have never witnessed a car loose power cause of a freeer flowing exhaust
mustangman02232 is offline  
Old 10-23-2006, 12:01 AM
  #16  
duk
1st Gear Member
 
duk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 60
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

IMO they cant loose hp. Backpressure effects all engines differently. For example in a 3.0 v6 that they put in rangers, the headers and exhaust modifications are pretty much pointless because those engines are built to get their torque from the backpressure. But anyway there is no way that an axleback can cause a 4-7 hp loss. I would have to see the dyno done in person for me to believe it.
duk is offline  
Old 10-30-2006, 03:59 PM
  #17  
555*
3rd Gear Member
 
555*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 716
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

From a member on THEMUSTANGSOURCE.COM:

Im looking at the issue of MM&FF where they do the Sn197 GT Exhaust Shoot-Out [In NO particular order...] This shows the loss of power by running no mufflers (SLP Loudmouth)

Stock Mufflers Made-289.9rwhp & 313rwtq...16 lbs each...Idle Noise 68dba...Cruise 2Krpm: 96 dBa

Bassani Race AB Made- 292.7rwhp & 314.rwtq...7.5lbs each...Idle Noise 71 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 98 dBa

Flowmaster AB Made-292rwhp & 314.5rwtq...16lbs each...Idle Noise 72 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 97 dBa

FRPP Stinger AB Made-292.7rwhp & 314.9rwtq...7.5lbs each...Idle Noise 71 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:96 dBa

UnMuffled (SLP Loudmouth)-290rwhp & 311.2rwtq...0 lbs...Idle: 73dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:99 dBa

JBA AxleBack-289.5rearwhp & 313rearwheeltq...11 lbs each...Idle: 71dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 98dBa

Magnaflow AB -290.2rwhp & 311.8rwtq...14lbs each...Idle: 66dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:98 dBa
(NOT Magnapacks


And if anyone would like to disagree with any of the info...I will be happy to scan the entire article up to prove you wrong
555* is offline  
Old 10-30-2006, 05:07 PM
  #18  
|UCF|chron
2nd Gear Member
 
|UCF|chron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location:
Posts: 355
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

ORIGINAL: 555*

From a member on THEMUSTANGSOURCE.COM:

Im looking at the issue of MM&FF where they do the Sn197 GT Exhaust Shoot-Out [In NO particular order...] This shows the loss of power by running no mufflers (SLP Loudmouth)

Stock Mufflers Made-289.9rwhp & 313rwtq...16 lbs each...Idle Noise 68dba...Cruise 2Krpm: 96 dBa

Bassani Race AB Made- 292.7rwhp & 314.rwtq...7.5lbs each...Idle Noise 71 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 98 dBa

Flowmaster AB Made-292rwhp & 314.5rwtq...16lbs each...Idle Noise 72 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 97 dBa

FRPP Stinger AB Made-292.7rwhp & 314.9rwtq...7.5lbs each...Idle Noise 71 dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:96 dBa

UnMuffled (SLP Loudmouth)-290rwhp & 311.2rwtq...0 lbs...Idle: 73dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:99 dBa

JBA AxleBack-289.5rearwhp & 313rearwheeltq...11 lbs each...Idle: 71dBa...Cruise 2Krpm: 98dBa

Magnaflow AB -290.2rwhp & 311.8rwtq...14lbs each...Idle: 66dBa...Cruise 2Krpm:98 dBa
(NOT Magnapacks


And if anyone would like to disagree with any of the info...I will be happy to scan the entire article up to prove you wrong
so +0.1hp and a loss of 1.8 lb/ft of torque
|UCF|chron is offline  
Old 10-30-2006, 05:17 PM
  #19  
555*
3rd Gear Member
 
555*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 716
Default RE: Is there really power loss with LMs?

Pretty much. I'm curious what the dyno graph actually looks like though. Is there more hp in some areas of the RPM rangs vs lower in other areas compared to stock? *still waits for a graph*
555* is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
jrrhd73must
Classic Mustang General Discussion
2
10-02-2015 09:17 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Is there really power loss with LMs?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:46 AM.