2009 RE-DESIGNED MUSTANG COMPILATION
10-22-2006, 06:51 PM
#11
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
RE: 2009 RE-DESIGNED MUSTANG COMPILATION
ORIGINAL: dmhines
Looks like a V6 to me ...
ORIGINAL: ThisBlood147
Ok, I'm gonna go ahead and ask because I know they've got ppl out there wondering.........WHERE can we get that grill?
[IMG]local://upfiles/28087/C44104210CBA45E69219DF00DF7A828B.jpg[/IMG]
Ok, I'm gonna go ahead and ask because I know they've got ppl out there wondering.........WHERE can we get that grill?
[IMG]local://upfiles/28087/C44104210CBA45E69219DF00DF7A828B.jpg[/IMG]
10-22-2006, 06:52 PM
#12
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
RE: 2009 RE-DESIGNED MUSTANG COMPILATION
ORIGINAL: mdlesk
Okay that car is way over priced. It costs over $100,000. Yes, I said that right. It's a 520 HP turbocharged 4.6 that is bored to 5.2L. It's 0-62 time is 4.2 seconds. I would def. buy a Viper first. The interior is sweet though. Here's the link:
GeigerCar Mustang GT520
Okay that car is way over priced. It costs over $100,000. Yes, I said that right. It's a 520 HP turbocharged 4.6 that is bored to 5.2L. It's 0-62 time is 4.2 seconds. I would def. buy a Viper first. The interior is sweet though. Here's the link:
GeigerCar Mustang GT520
And for a turbocharged 5.2 cid engine..........that is a downright PATHETIC horsepower number.
10-22-2006, 08:06 PM
#14
5th Gear Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
RE: 2009 RE-DESIGNED MUSTANG COMPILATION
Ok, wait, its not turbocharged..........its supercharged. Looks like a Whipple unit. Still, they'd have to be running puny amounts of boost to ONLY be making 520 at the crank. And the torque number is even more pathetic. I'm gonna have to go ahead and say that these guys didn't know what the hell they were doing when they were building up that 4.6 motor. Boneheads probably increased the CR on the heads. But still, that torque figure is downright laughable for a positive displacement blower on this kind of setup. [:'(]
I'll probably be making well over that hp figure when I go to the 3.4" pulley on my Saleen..........and that's just 35K total invested in my car (car+mods). These guys aren't gonna make any money with this product.
I'll probably be making well over that hp figure when I go to the 3.4" pulley on my Saleen..........and that's just 35K total invested in my car (car+mods). These guys aren't gonna make any money with this product.
10-22-2006, 08:14 PM
#15
5th Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: DBN, MI
Posts: 2,578
RE: 2009 RE-DESIGNED MUSTANG COMPILATION
ORIGINAL: ThisBlood147
For real. You can build 2 mustangs that could kick that one's *** for that kind of dough.[8D]
And for a turbocharged 5.2 cid engine..........that is a downright PATHETIC horsepower number.
ORIGINAL: mdlesk
Okay that car is way over priced. It costs over $100,000. Yes, I said that right. It's a 520 HP turbocharged 4.6 that is bored to 5.2L. It's 0-62 time is 4.2 seconds. I would def. buy a Viper first. The interior is sweet though. Here's the link:
GeigerCar Mustang GT520
Okay that car is way over priced. It costs over $100,000. Yes, I said that right. It's a 520 HP turbocharged 4.6 that is bored to 5.2L. It's 0-62 time is 4.2 seconds. I would def. buy a Viper first. The interior is sweet though. Here's the link:
GeigerCar Mustang GT520
And for a turbocharged 5.2 cid engine..........that is a downright PATHETIC horsepower number.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NorthAmericanTuning
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
3
03-18-2016 11:21 AM