Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Roush 427R TrakPak

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-02-2007, 08:19 PM
  #41  
DeStonn
4th Gear Member
 
DeStonn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southern California(Orange County)
Posts: 1,400
Default RE: Roush 427R TrakPak

ORIGINAL: pascal

ORIGINAL: Toad

Most airfoils become "efficient" at very slow airspeeds. This simply means they get laminar flow and begin to create "lift". The amount of lift created depends on the airfoil shape, the angle of attack, and the speed of the relative wind. Most "Spoilers" on the backs of cars are just that. They spoil the flow of air over the top of the back of the car, creating vertices that actually slow the vehicle down due to increased drag. Even though they look like they "push" the air upwards, (which would create a downward force), they really don't do that at all. The Cervini duck tail looks nice, but it actually slows the car down at higher speeds due to the vertical vertices rolling off the back of the car.

In order to create a downward force, you need an airfoilthat creates lift in a downward vector. Basically an upside down wing. The wing that Roush is using in these photos is a true wing. It creates the downward forces without creating drag due to vertices or turbulence. Any time you create lift you also create a small amount of drag, but this is what is known as "induced drag" and is not related to the drag coming off the back of the car. Roush's wing is therfore much more effective at creating the desired downward force, and at the same time creates much less "parasitic drag", the bad kind that the Cervini wing makes.

Thanks for the lesson in physics son butWe don't need down force around town or at civilized speed on the highways.
Having said that, I completly agree with you on the fact that the wing on that Roush is a true one (adjustable and all) and my duck tail is for looks.
But I went for looks with my Stang, since I'm not racing it.
Well it is a TrakPak built for the track so the physics lesson was warranted and the wing does have a purpose in this life
DeStonn is offline  
Old 10-02-2007, 08:25 PM
  #42  
sw07gt
4th Gear Member
 
sw07gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 1,502
Default RE: Roush 427R TrakPak

I love the TrakPak so damn sexy.
sw07gt is offline  
Old 10-02-2007, 09:13 PM
  #43  
pascal
S197 Section Modder-ator
 
pascal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
Default RE: Roush 427R TrakPak

ORIGINAL: DeStonn

ORIGINAL: pascal

ORIGINAL: Toad

Most airfoils become "efficient" at very slow airspeeds. This simply means they get laminar flow and begin to create "lift". The amount of lift created depends on the airfoil shape, the angle of attack, and the speed of the relative wind. Most "Spoilers" on the backs of cars are just that. They spoil the flow of air over the top of the back of the car, creating vertices that actually slow the vehicle down due to increased drag. Even though they look like they "push" the air upwards, (which would create a downward force), they really don't do that at all. The Cervini duck tail looks nice, but it actually slows the car down at higher speeds due to the vertical vertices rolling off the back of the car.

In order to create a downward force, you need an airfoilthat creates lift in a downward vector. Basically an upside down wing. The wing that Roush is using in these photos is a true wing. It creates the downward forces without creating drag due to vertices or turbulence. Any time you create lift you also create a small amount of drag, but this is what is known as "induced drag" and is not related to the drag coming off the back of the car. Roush's wing is therfore much more effective at creating the desired downward force, and at the same time creates much less "parasitic drag", the bad kind that the Cervini wing makes.

Thanks for the lesson in physics son butWe don't need down force around town or at civilized speed on the highways.
Having said that, I completly agree with you on the fact that the wing on that Roush is a true one (adjustable and all) and my duck tail is for looks.
But I went for looks with my Stang, since I'm not racing it.
Well it is a TrakPak built for the track so the physics lesson was warranted and the wing does have a purpose in this life

Well, I just lost the perfect opportunity to keep my thoughts for myself on that one.
That car is indeed build for the track.
pascal is offline  
Old 10-02-2007, 09:22 PM
  #44  
Black06stang
4th Gear Member
 
Black06stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: greenville
Posts: 1,268
Default RE: Roush 427R TrakPak

Is the price $28,000 above the price of a regular GT?
Black06stang is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PaulH2
Members Rides and Car Show Section
20
01-31-2016 09:48 AM
AMAlexLazarus
AmericanMuscle.com
0
10-01-2015 09:21 AM
MustangForums Editor
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
1
09-30-2015 12:39 PM
mungodrums
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
10
09-28-2015 10:54 PM
firecoyote
S550 2015-2023 Mustang
28
09-27-2015 02:37 PM



Quick Reply: Roush 427R TrakPak



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:20 AM.