Mustang GT vs Chrysler 300 C
10-10-2007, 01:17 PM
#23
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: AZ, TX, CA
Posts: 234
RE: Mustang GT vs Chrysler 300 C
If you have to get a four door, get an SRT not the 300c. Hell, dont even think about a 300, get a Jeep SRT. My dad uses it as adaily driver. Otherwise, get the mustang, the best value sports car out there.
10-10-2007, 01:21 PM
#24
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 1,486
RE: Mustang GT vs Chrysler 300 C
The Chrysler 300 is a heavier car, so the extra HP is needed to make up for the weight.
Plus, you could expect to pay a lot money for a bigger car with more luxuries and more HP. What do you expect?
Plus, you could expect to pay a lot money for a bigger car with more luxuries and more HP. What do you expect?
10-12-2007, 11:24 PM
#29
4th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,553
RE: Mustang GT vs Chrysler 300 C
this post is a joke, do a test drive on the cars, a V6 with cai, exhaust and tune will easily beat that 300c.
and have you ever looked at the two cars, not the car i'd want to be going fast inor turning fast.
and have you ever looked at the two cars, not the car i'd want to be going fast inor turning fast.
10-12-2007, 11:35 PM
#30
S197 Section Modder-ator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Orlando FL
Posts: 13,373
RE: Mustang GT vs Chrysler 300 C
I already new that.
.
My point is that a lighter car is more fun to drive, even if it's slower.
A friend of mine has a 1963Triumph TR4. I drive it sometimes, it's slow butit's a blast. This thing is on rails.
That thread was wrong from the begining anyway. 2 door/4 door thing doesn't add up.
.My point is that a lighter car is more fun to drive, even if it's slower.
A friend of mine has a 1963Triumph TR4. I drive it sometimes, it's slow butit's a blast. This thing is on rails.
That thread was wrong from the begining anyway. 2 door/4 door thing doesn't add up.