performance.....(got the car done today)
#41
RE: performance.....(got the car done today)
ORIGINAL: Burnsy
cuz people are going to keep doing what i did, which is read the OP, and then fast reply, and before you know it we have 5 pages of dyno bashing, and no suggestions for his S/C
ORIGINAL: ThumperMX113
Why? No one is getting out of hand, we're just discussing what is presented to us.
Why? No one is getting out of hand, we're just discussing what is presented to us.
#43
RE: performance.....(got the car done today)
ORIGINAL: Burnsy
cuz people are going to keep doing what i did, which is read the OP, and then fast reply, and before you know it we have 5 pages of dyno bashing, and no suggestions for his S/C
cuz people are going to keep doing what i did, which is read the OP, and then fast reply, and before you know it we have 5 pages of dyno bashing, and no suggestions for his S/C
Hard to not get carried away with thread like that.
#44
RE: performance.....(got the car done today)
A couple of things guys...
1. The tuner in question uses a Dynojet, which reads higher than a mustang dyno, which is the numbers most claim on here. Plus, from what someone said, this guy doesn't SAE correct his numbers, which means ambient temp is going to have an effect on the number.
2. She also put on an Offroad X Pipe, removing the cats. Most would agree that 10 hp is not an unreasonable number, considering that the stock cats are pretty close to flowing hat a high flow will.
3. Steeda claims 36 HP at the tires on their CAI with the high flow tube. With a custom tune I can completely see this happening. Most of you guys are throwing numbers out from mail order tunes. Mail order tunes will never dyno the way a custom tune will. A mail order tune is close, but a custom tune is spot on to what the car wants and will always dyno more.
Anyway, I say nice numbers!
As for the Supercharger question? I am partial to a whipple myself. They've had a good name in the biz for a long time, and FRPP thinks their SC is good enough to back.
1. The tuner in question uses a Dynojet, which reads higher than a mustang dyno, which is the numbers most claim on here. Plus, from what someone said, this guy doesn't SAE correct his numbers, which means ambient temp is going to have an effect on the number.
2. She also put on an Offroad X Pipe, removing the cats. Most would agree that 10 hp is not an unreasonable number, considering that the stock cats are pretty close to flowing hat a high flow will.
3. Steeda claims 36 HP at the tires on their CAI with the high flow tube. With a custom tune I can completely see this happening. Most of you guys are throwing numbers out from mail order tunes. Mail order tunes will never dyno the way a custom tune will. A mail order tune is close, but a custom tune is spot on to what the car wants and will always dyno more.
Anyway, I say nice numbers!
As for the Supercharger question? I am partial to a whipple myself. They've had a good name in the biz for a long time, and FRPP thinks their SC is good enough to back.
#45
RE: performance.....(got the car done today)
Not a chance you have 312 .... Mine is basically a full bolt on and I'm sitting at 319. I dyno'd at 265 when I was stock so according to your tuner I should be way higher if I could get to 312 with just a CAI. Not calling you a lier, bashing you or anything but I think that your tuner is wrong and way off -- sorry man.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
92 5.0stang
5.0L (1979-1995) Mustang
4
08-13-2015 06:46 AM
Milan Dragway
Members Rides and Car Show Section
0
08-12-2015 03:43 PM