Improved down force in the rear with a duck tail? (yes for the track)
#21
RE: Improved down force in the rear with a duck tail? (yes for the track)
ORIGINAL: suoperdave84
This car is brick at the front....and you're worried about a functional spoiler. Priceless.
This car is brick at the front....and you're worried about a functional spoiler. Priceless.
#23
RE: Improved down force in the rear with a duck tail? (yes for the track)
The shape of the car has alot to do with it as well. The more severe the downward shape of the rear of the car, the worse the rear end lift will be.
For example, the Audi TT was originally built without a spoiler. But after several very highspeed incidents where they lost rear traction, a recall was made and they were fitted with a spoiler.
The Mustang already has a 'notchy' backend which should break up the air flow just fine... you won't lose anything by adding a rear spoiler, but then again the gains will most likely be so minimal that you won't notice anything.
As mentioned earlier, a properly sprung car will provide MUCH better results that a rear spoiler...
For example, the Audi TT was originally built without a spoiler. But after several very highspeed incidents where they lost rear traction, a recall was made and they were fitted with a spoiler.
The Mustang already has a 'notchy' backend which should break up the air flow just fine... you won't lose anything by adding a rear spoiler, but then again the gains will most likely be so minimal that you won't notice anything.
As mentioned earlier, a properly sprung car will provide MUCH better results that a rear spoiler...
#24
RE: Improved down force in the rear with a duck tail? (yes for the track)
ORIGINAL: Steve O Chap
As mentioned earlier, a properly sprung car will provide MUCH better results that a rear spoiler...
As mentioned earlier, a properly sprung car will provide MUCH better results that a rear spoiler...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mungodrums
5.0L GT S550 Tech
7
10-07-2015 04:01 AM
M3hunter
S197 Handling Section
0
09-05-2015 03:42 PM