Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-24-2008, 12:19 PM
  #11  
wasvette
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
wasvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 595
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: mac10chap

The JBA system retains the cats if you buy their H-pipe. I have the JBA system with L/T's and didnt get it coated merely b/c back when i bought the set up, it cost a lot more than it does now.

With that being said, I dont have any problems with the set up and the heat has not been an issue yet. If you can afford to shell out the extra money, then go ahead and get the heat shielded ones. If not, then I wouldnt worry about it.

Also, I looked at the OBX system on ebay (there are a lot of them on there cheap)...never heard of them but seems like more people are buying them cause of the price...Like they say, you get what you pay for...
Thanks mac10chap - I'm a little fuzzy after the weekend and having trouble visualizing how the JBA LTs retain the cats with their H-pipe? Does it come with high flow cats or are you using the OE ones?
wasvette is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:21 PM
  #12  
Black05StangGT
3rd Gear Member
 
Black05StangGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location:
Posts: 860
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

Using OE cats almost negates the purpose of putting the long tubes on there...if you are trying to increase flow at least get some high flow cats...I say get the setup that makes you warm and fuzzy...is it price, is it brand image...whatever you think will work best for you...people are just here to provide their opinions on different setups...but I will say that if someone hasn't used a product they shouldn't be telling you one way or another about the quality because they obviously don't know anything about it because they've never used it...
Black05StangGT is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:26 PM
  #13  
wasvette
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
wasvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 595
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: Black05StangGT

You do get what you pay for...I got what you did and paid a lot less...just because something is cheaper doesn't make it inferior...I have seen people complain on here about their American Racing headers rubbing or scraping from clearance issues...I have no issues and there are several other people have had very few if any issues with this setup...but mine are inferior because they are cheaper...they are cheaper because they don't have 5 billion dollars worth of marketing driving the product...it’s all economics...but I'm sure you already knew that...in the end buy what makes you happy I guess...if you want to save some money the OBX is a nice setup...if you want to pay more for a stronger more heavily marketed name brand then that is your decision...I just know there are enough people that have had success with the OBX setup to make it worth the money they and I have spent...
BLACK05STANGGT - IS THIS THE RIGHT SITE - WHY DON'T THEY LIST THE S197 HEADERS ON THE SITE. IS IT A NEW PRODUCT?

http://www.obxracingsports.com/products.php?pk=907
wasvette is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:30 PM
  #14  
F1Fan
4th Gear Member
 
F1Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,471
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: wasvette
Looking to do the JBA headers fairly soon. Is the stainless steel version OK? Is the ceramic coated model going to really make a difference? The factory manifolds obviously aren't coated.
If you went stainless, do you regret not spending a little extra, or are you happy with the choice?
Hi wasvette!

I have JBA shorty heanders finished in Ti ceramic and that stuff works like you can't believe! I though is was B.S. and was just going to buy the plain stainless and just have them Jet Hot coated. But somehowJBA didn'thave the plainstainless in stocksoI got the Ti coated version for about the samemoneyas the plain stainless. I knew the JetHot coatingswould last a long time but this stuff actaully really works as a thermal barrier in addition to keeping the headers looking good if not so muchpretty.

OBTW, all JBA S197GTheaders are stainless steel, the differences are in how they are finished. The plain stainless headers will discolor slightly andwilleventually show some very light surface rust. This is just like our stock exhaust systemsbecause JBA uses the same 409 stainless for their headers.The use of409 type stainless steel material for headers is good but 304 or some of the other 3XX series steels are more resistent to heat. But the thing is if you are going to have them coated anyway who cares? The headers will never see the kind of temps that are hard are the even 409 series material and 409 is lower costwhich can go along way towards thecost of ceramic coating them.

Of the coatings that JBA offers the Ti finish isfar superior in terms of use as athermal barrier. The under hood temps of cars with the Ti coated headers is noticably lower than even thesilver ceramic coated JBA headers. The Ti ceramic coating isnot as pretty as the shinney ceramic coating but it worksmuch better at keeping your engine bay cool andreduces under hood cooking time on everthing under the hood it is well worth the extra money in the long run.


If you combine the JBA headers with a MagnaFlow Tru-X Pipe with OBDII cats you get some pretty decent power out of the system in additiona to being emissions legal even here in California. I got 16-18rwhp out of them on a Dynojet using SAE correction (smoothing5 which givesthe LOWEST power readings) blowing out the stock exhaust system. This is pretty good power and close to what folks with long tubes and O/R H/X pipes are seeing on the same dyno. But just like a good set of long tubes and matching H/X pipe they are not cheap and are a PITA to install though not as bad as long tubes are.

HTH!
F1Fan is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:37 PM
  #15  
wasvette
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
wasvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 595
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: F1Fan

ORIGINAL: wasvette
Looking to do the JBA headers fairly soon. Is the stainless steel version OK? Is the ceramic coated model going to really make a difference? The factory manifolds obviously aren't coated.
If you went stainless, do you regret not spending a little extra, or are you happy with the choice?
Hi wasvette!

I have JBA shorty heanders finished in Ti ceramic and that stuff works like you can't believe! I though is was B.S. and was just going to buy the plain stainless and just have them Jet Hot coated. But somehowJBA didn'thave the plainstainless in stocksoI got the Ti coated version for about the samemoneyas the plain stainless. I knew the JetHot coatingswould last a long time but this stuff actaully really works as a thermal barrier in addition to keeping the headers looking good if not so muchpretty.

OBTW, all JBA S197GTheaders are stainless steel, the differences are in how they are finished. The plain stainless headers will discolor slightly andwilleventually show some very light surface rust. This is just like our stock exhaust systemsbecause JBA uses the same 409 stainless for their headers.The use of409 type stainless steel material for headers is good but 304 or some of the other 3XX series steels are more resistent to heat. But the thing is if you are going to have them coated anyway who cares? The headers will never see the kind of temps that are hard are the even 409 series material and 409 is lower costwhich can go along way towards thecost of ceramic coating them.

Of the coatings that JBA offers the Ti finish isfar superior in terms of use as athermal barrier. The under hood temps of cars with the Ti coated headers is noticably lower than even thesilver ceramic coated JBA headers. The Ti ceramic coating isnot as pretty as the shinney ceramic coating but it worksmuch better at keeping your engine bay cool andreduces under hood cooking time on everthing under the hood it is well worth the extra money in the long run.


If you combine the JBA headers with a MagnaFlow Tru-X Pipe with OBDII cats you get some pretty decent power out of the system in additiona to being emissions legal even here in California. I got 16-18rwhp out of them on a Dynojet using SAE correction (smoothing5 which givesthe LOWEST power readings) blowing out the stock exhaust system. This is pretty good power and close to what folks with long tubes and O/R H/X pipes are seeing on the same dyno. But just like a good set of long tubes and matching H/X pipe they are not cheap and are a PITA to install though not as bad as long tubes are.

HTH!
CHIP - IS THIS THE ONE IN THE LINK? IS $455 SHIPPED A GOOD PRICE?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/JBA-1...spagenameZWDVW

THANKS,
KEVIN
wasvette is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:45 PM
  #16  
F1Fan
4th Gear Member
 
F1Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: California
Posts: 1,471
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: wasvette

IS THERE A BOLT ON LT HEADER SET UP THAT RETAINS CATS? WITHOUT ANY WELDING, ETC?
Hi wasvette,

Yes most long tubes including JBA's (which sound fantastic BTW)are available with cats but the problem is that the cats are moved way down streamand this is explicitly prohibited by federal emission laws. This is one of the reasons that only JBA and recently Edelbrockshortys are 50 statesemissions legal and not one singlelongtube header from any source is emissionsl legal. Having the cats so far away from the exhaust ports causes the exhaust temps to be much lower by the time the gase**** the cats so it takes even longer for the cats to start to work which is the problem with folks getting CEL all of the time if they have LT's with cats. You can reprogram the ECU to ignore orallow a longer cold start periods but this still will occassionally cause CEL to come on. The right way to do headers is with a shorty and an OBDII compliant cat and down pipe as MagnaFlow has done. 100% no problemsbecause the O2 sensors are in the same spot as stock and the cats are even closer to the heads so you will neversee a CEL caused bythe shorty headers or catted down pipe unless of course you have an O2 failure.

HTH!
F1Fan is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 12:49 PM
  #17  
wasvette
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
wasvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 595
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: F1Fan

ORIGINAL: wasvette

IS THERE A BOLT ON LT HEADER SET UP THAT RETAINS CATS? WITHOUT ANY WELDING, ETC?
Hi wasvette,

Yes most long tubes including JBA's (which sound fantastic BTW)are available with cats but the problem is that the cats are moved way down streamand this is explicitly prohibited by federal emission laws. This is one of the reasons that only JBA and recently Edelbrockshortys are 50 statesemissions legal and not one singlelongtube header from any source is emissionsl legal. Having the cats so far away from the exhaust ports causes the exhaust temps to be much lower by the time the gase**** the cats so it takes even longer for the cats to start to work which is the problem with folks getting CEL all of the time if they have LT's with cats. You can reprogram the ECU to ignore orallow a longer cold start periods but this still will occassionally cause CEL to come on. The right way to do headers is with a shorty and an OBDII compliant cat and down pipe as MagnaFlow has done. 100% no problemsbecause the O2 sensors are in the same spot as stock and the cats are even closer to the heads so you will neversee a CEL caused bythe shorty headers or catted down pipe unless of course you have an O2 failure.

HTH!
FI - THANKS FOR THE DETAILED EXPLANATION!
wasvette is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 01:39 PM
  #18  
RedStang06
2nd Gear Member
 
RedStang06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 181
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...


CHIP - IS THIS THE ONE IN THE LINK? IS $455 SHIPPED A GOOD PRICE?

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/JBA-1...spagenameZWDVW

THANKS,
KEVIN
FANTASTIC PRICE!!!
RedStang06 is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 01:59 PM
  #19  
jawsgt
2nd Gear Member
 
jawsgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 406
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

i have OBX headers and run the resonated h-pipe with my pypes mid muffler and it sounds absolutey amazing. not 1 problem with the headers or h-pipe since installing them in august and still look very good even for being stainless and about 8k miles since the install. fit was decent and quality seemed great...highly recomended
jawsgt is offline  
Old 03-24-2008, 02:02 PM
  #20  
wasvette
3rd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
wasvette's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Georgia
Posts: 595
Default RE: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...

ORIGINAL: jawsgt

i have OBX headers and run the resonated h-pipe with my pypes mid muffler and it sounds absolutey amazing. not 1 problem with the headers or h-pipe since installing them in august and still look very good even for being stainless and about 8k miles since the install. fit was decent and quality seemed great...highly recomended
jawsgt - Have you gotten any CEL codes?
wasvette is offline  


Quick Reply: Those With HEADERS Please Weigh In...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.