AEM Dryflow Airfilters
03-30-2008, 07:33 PM
#1
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada!
Posts: 70
AEM Dryflow Airfilters
Well I'm at the point where I don't feel like re-oiling my K&N's anymore and I've been searching around for the dry filters that are out there. Today I stumbled on the AEM dryflow filters http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
03-30-2008, 07:59 PM
#2
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
03-30-2008, 09:13 PM
#3
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 700
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
ORIGINAL: ponypit
Well I'm at the point where I don't feel like re-oiling my K&N's anymore and I've been searching around for the dry filters that are out there. Today I stumbled on the AEM dryflow filters http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
Well I'm at the point where I don't feel like re-oiling my K&N's anymore and I've been searching around for the dry filters that are out there. Today I stumbled on the AEM dryflow filters http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
The AEM seemed a bit more restrictive than the Amsoil. I believe it was because the AEM filter was so big that it was actually touching the top of hood. You can try either one, but it will probably be easier to find an Amsoil filter that will fit. Simply measure your filter and order.
I did a lot of reading on cotton gauze filters like the K&N. I'm not impressed at all with their ability to filter dust, not to mention the risk of over oiling and ruining a MAF sensor.
If you read AEM's website they don't hide the fact that the synthetic material is a bit more restrictive than cotton gauze like the K&N. The engineering data is right there.
The engineering reports also shows how poorly cotton gauze is at filtering air until the filter gets really dirty. A K&N filter traps dirt much better when it's dirty, because the dirt closes the holes in the cotton gauze. In comparison, the synthetic material filters great even when it's clean.
It seems to me that synthetic air filters are a good middle of the road solution. They offer better air flow than a paper element, less than cotton gauze, but do a far better job of filtering dirt than oiled cotton filters. They also offer less maintenance and are possibly more durable.
It seemed like my throttle response was just a little less with both synthetic filters. I've done blind tests with friends and they could also tell the difference. It's subtle, but it's there. The computer will easily adjust to the new airflow and otherwise the car runs fine.
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
03-30-2008, 09:22 PM
#4
1st Gear Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Canada!
Posts: 70
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
ORIGINAL: wmtheflash
Yes, I've tried both of these. They both seemed to be of equally good quality, however, the AEM filter didn't fit my Steeda intake very well, so I have switched to the Amsoil EAA filter.
The AEM seemed a bit more restrictive than the Amsoil. I believe it was because the AEM filter was so big that it was actually touching the top of hood. You can try either one, but it will probably be easier to find an Amsoil filter that will fit. Simply measure your filter and order.
I did a lot of reading on cotton gauze filters like the K&N. I'm not impressed at all with their ability to filter dust, not to mention the risk of over oiling and ruining a MAF sensor.
If you read AEM's website they don't hide the fact that the synthetic material is a bit more restrictive than cotton gauze like the K&N. The engineering data is right there.
The engineering reports also shows how poorly cotton gauze is at filtering air until the filter gets really dirty. A K&N filter traps dirt much better when it's dirty, because the dirt closes the holes in the cotton gauze. In comparison, the synthetic material filters great even when it's clean.
It seems to me that synthetic air filters are a good middle of the road solution. They offer better air flow than a paper element, less than cotton gauze, but do a far better job of filtering dirt than oiled cotton filters. They also offer less maintenance and are possibly more durable.
It seemed like my throttle response was just a little less with both synthetic filters. I've done blind tests with friends and they could also tell the difference. It's subtle, but it's there. The computer will easily adjust to the new airflow and otherwise the car runs fine.
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
ORIGINAL: ponypit
Well I'm at the point where I don't feel like re-oiling my K&N's anymore and I've been searching around for the dry filters that are out there. Today I stumbled on the AEM dryflow filters http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
Well I'm at the point where I don't feel like re-oiling my K&N's anymore and I've been searching around for the dry filters that are out there. Today I stumbled on the AEM dryflow filters http://www.aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=93
Has anyone swapped their S&B/K&N for one of these? Seems like a neat concept, just wondering if anyone has had any experience with them and/or noticed a difference in how the car runs with them. Let me know when you have some time.
The AEM seemed a bit more restrictive than the Amsoil. I believe it was because the AEM filter was so big that it was actually touching the top of hood. You can try either one, but it will probably be easier to find an Amsoil filter that will fit. Simply measure your filter and order.
I did a lot of reading on cotton gauze filters like the K&N. I'm not impressed at all with their ability to filter dust, not to mention the risk of over oiling and ruining a MAF sensor.
If you read AEM's website they don't hide the fact that the synthetic material is a bit more restrictive than cotton gauze like the K&N. The engineering data is right there.
The engineering reports also shows how poorly cotton gauze is at filtering air until the filter gets really dirty. A K&N filter traps dirt much better when it's dirty, because the dirt closes the holes in the cotton gauze. In comparison, the synthetic material filters great even when it's clean.
It seems to me that synthetic air filters are a good middle of the road solution. They offer better air flow than a paper element, less than cotton gauze, but do a far better job of filtering dirt than oiled cotton filters. They also offer less maintenance and are possibly more durable.
It seemed like my throttle response was just a little less with both synthetic filters. I've done blind tests with friends and they could also tell the difference. It's subtle, but it's there. The computer will easily adjust to the new airflow and otherwise the car runs fine.
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
03-31-2008, 10:25 AM
#5
2nd Gear Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CO
Posts: 439
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
I don't think you can go wrong with the AEM. I don't have one on my Mustang, but I do have one on my other car. Like ponypit said, it's a little more restrictive than the cotton gauze, but it filters soooooooooooooo much better. The car I'm using it on had ~115k miles when I made the swap from oiled gauze. At my 120k oil change, the oil had gone back to clear and honey colored like when the truck was new, where with the oiled gauze, it was always black and opaque. I realize this isn't the most quantitative of tests, but it was convincing enough for me. I haven't gotten around to cleaning it yet, but it is a lot simpler than the oiled gauze filters. No more spraying with emulsifier, rinsing, spraying, rinsing, letting it dry overnight, spreading the oil, letting it sit for several hours so the oil soaks in completely, letting the excess oil drain off, andno more worries about whether or not you're going to foul the MAF because you over oiled the filter. Just a simple water bath, rinse, and let it dry.
03-31-2008, 03:15 PM
#6
1st Gear Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 78
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
I have the AEM Brute Force Intake. The filter doesn't flow as much as the K&N. I don't know if it makes much difference. The Dryflow still flows really well. I'm happy with it. I checked out the Amsoil website and those look good too. I can't say if either one flows better. It is awesome not having to deal with oiling a filter.
03-31-2008, 04:12 PM
#7
6th Gear Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 11,278
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
ORIGINAL: wmtheflash
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
I've been looking at the amsoil filters because I drive in a dust bowl, but i'm not so sure they will make much difference. Just look at how much difference there is between oiled cotton and paper.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm
03-31-2008, 07:12 PM
#8
3rd Gear Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 700
RE: AEM Dryflow Airfilters
ORIGINAL: moosestang
What generic cotton gauze filter are you talking about? If it doesn't say K&N on it, then it's likely made by S&B.
I've been looking at the amsoil filters because I drive in a dust bowl, but i'm not so sure they will make much difference. Just look at how much difference there is between oiled cotton and paper.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm
ORIGINAL: wmtheflash
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
I'd rather give up a small amount of airflow to protect my engine. In fact, I often wonder how well these generic cotton gauze air filters actually work, even when compared to a name brand like K&N. A cheap air filter that doesn't work very well will actually feel more powerful than a filter that's doing it's job.
I've been looking at the amsoil filters because I drive in a dust bowl, but i'm not so sure they will make much difference. Just look at how much difference there is between oiled cotton and paper.
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/airfilter/airtest3.htm
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
