Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2010 Revealed

Old 11-18-2008, 06:01 PM
  #91  
ayrton02
4th Gear Member
 
ayrton02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 1,265
Default

Ehhh.... It took awhile for the s197 to grow on me. I'm rather disappointed. IF I was considering buying the 2010 Mustang, I'd rather find a pristine terminator. The termi would be around $20K and throw about $7k of mods into it. Terminator > every other late-model, non-Roush/Saleen Stang. Right now, I'm 20, living with mom and pop, got a part time job, and most importantly going to college and saving up to buy the best power for my dollar.... a used LS1.

Roush and Saleen will keep on making a more badass version of the Mustang that will look better and outrun any Camaro. The Camaro only has the v6, z28, and SS. Between Ford, Roush, and Saleen, there are a whole lot more options if you want performance. Ford knows this. They are making a car that will make a profit, not power. This is why the v6 Mustangs have kept the Mustang ahead of the sales in the f-bodies. I highly doubt the new Camaro or Challenger will be around 10 years from now making a profit and representing a company like the Mustang does.
ayrton02 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:21 PM
  #92  
projectresto83
M.A.D. Motorsports
 
projectresto83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 8,014
Default

Under powered and too heavy, I like the new quarter panels and am ok with the front but the rear and trunk design is ugly.

5.0! 5.0! 5.0! WHERE IS THE 5.0! or a 5.4 as an option!
WTF FORD!
projectresto83 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:35 PM
  #93  
67BullittCoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
67BullittCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, Flawda
Posts: 865
Default

why do they need a 5.0? the current car weighs 3500 lbs

the ss camaro and srt 8 challenger wiegh 4300 lbs

big difference. so let them have 100 more horsepower, they need it.

btw remember the GT is the base V8 package? how many times do they need to tell all you guys?

also the 300 HP v6 camaro is going to be a failure. if you think about it the v6 cars are meant for people who dont need performance but like the looks of the cars. the insurance on those cars will be ridiculous, and many people will buy the v6 mustang over the v6 camaro


and lastly remember that there has been a mid performance model in between the GT and the GT 500 since 2003. im sure they will step up the shelby GT or introduce a mach 1 or bullitt or boss edition in between the cobra and GT




EVERY ONE DONT GET YOUR PANTIES IN A BUNCH,

seriously i cant remember a new mustang anyone liked. seems Ford just cant get it right?

we should all drive classics
67BullittCoupe is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 07:56 PM
  #94  
ThisBlood147
5th Gear Member
 
ThisBlood147's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 4,197
Default

Originally Posted by 67BullittCoupe

we should all drive classics
I'm all for that.
ThisBlood147 is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:00 PM
  #95  
tailwind
 
tailwind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 49
Default

After seeing the pictures of the 2010 Mustang, I have to say that I do not like the styling. Especially do not like the rear styling. I had a new 1965 Mustang coupe and have been kicking myself since trading it off and a Chevelle 3 years later so sure am not going to make the mistake of getting rid of either my 2006 convertible or 2007 coupe. I like the styling of the 2005-2009 models and am sticking with those for the rest of my time on earth. Each person has the right to their own opinions but these are my thoughts on the 2010.
tailwind is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:04 PM
  #96  
VistaGTCS
1st Gear Member
 
VistaGTCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 127
Default

The '10 isn't bad, but I'm not ready to get rid of my '08. I do like the interior better, just not sure about the exterior. The new wheels pretty much suck, but there's always the aftermarket...
VistaGTCS is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:09 PM
  #97  
67BullittCoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
67BullittCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, Flawda
Posts: 865
Default

as for wheels you guys need to look at the order form

they have 18 inch modern Bullitts

they are curved five spokes. they are not "bullitts" but they look great on the car.
67BullittCoupe is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:11 PM
  #98  
Riptide
6th Gear Member
 
Riptide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Montaner
Posts: 6,193
Default

Originally Posted by 67BullittCoupe
the ss camaro and srt 8 challenger wiegh 4300 lbs
I'm pretty sure that is incorrect, especially the SS.
Riptide is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:11 PM
  #99  
67BullittCoupe
3rd Gear Member
 
67BullittCoupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Orlando, Flawda
Posts: 865
Default

go to page six of the order form for wheel options, i dont think youll be dissapointed.
67BullittCoupe is offline  
Old 11-18-2008, 08:23 PM
  #100  
East87
4th Gear Member
 
East87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Newark, Delaware
Posts: 1,259
Default

i'll spend $7,000 to invest in a Saleen series VI, whoop heavily on the stock SS's, all while staying under $33,000 total paid for my car.
East87 is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 2010 Revealed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.