The purists won't be happy with a sixxer, regardless the power...
Then again, the V6 is what makes the Mustang in sale volume. |
Originally Posted by pascal
(Post 5975851)
The purists won't be happy with a sixxer, regardless the power...
Then again, the V6 is what makes the Mustang in sale volume. My other car is an LT1 and sure it sounds great with a loping idle and there is no mistake that it has power but, I pay for it at the pump. For a daily driver, I'll take modern technology all day long. For fun, give me that sweet sound of cubic inches. |
i dont know how many of you guys went to the recent autoshows that were goin on but if you did and checked out the ford section they had a cutaway of those ecoboost turbos and they are TINY so a turbo upgrade would be the first mandatory upgrade
|
As far as I'm concerned, they can keep their 50 HP if they're only going to offer it with an automatic . . .
Norm |
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
(Post 5977877)
As far as I'm concerned, they can keep their 50 HP if they're only going to offer it with an automatic . . .
Norm |
Originally Posted by Jost
(Post 5978168)
I am definately in agreement with Norm. I would give up H.P. anyday so that I can shift.. its about haveing fun driving.
manny trannies since 1979. I prefer "driving" a car as opposed to "riding" in a car. |
Originally Posted by torque_is_good
(Post 5975401)
just give us that engine as a choice. I wonder how solid the bottom end is. With 3.5 liters to begin, you could add a bit more boost and a few mods and easily pump over 400HP. Please add the engine as an option to the stangs.
|
i think when the time comes for the federally mandated fuel mileage restrictions i believe the mustang will be offered with a highly fuel efficient NA V6 and the Ecoboost motor on a mass scale but i believe they will still have a V8 option but it wont be in the numbers the current GTs are in right now maybe only like a special like a cobra or GT500 or the likes
cause according from what i have read it is only an average MPG across the whole line up of cars that a manufacturer makes so Ford could still have a marginally fuel efficient V8 as long as they have a few highly fuel efficient cars like the future Fiesta and a more fuel efficient Focus |
Originally Posted by pascal
(Post 5968861)
Ford changed tactic with the Taurus...
It is now gonna be a luxury car, that will compete with Lexus. So I say the hell with the SHO. Buy the cheaper GT, supercharge it and spank the Taurus with a sh#t load of money left in your pocket ;)
Originally Posted by wilkinda
(Post 5966796)
Below is the link to the official Ford product release on the new 2010 Ford Taurus SHO..... 365 HP!!!!
doe that matter? http://www.thefordstory.com/green/ta...hp-ecoboost-v/
Originally Posted by Norm Peterson
(Post 5977877)
As far as I'm concerned, they can keep their 50 HP if they're only going to offer it with an automatic . . .
Norm
Originally Posted by powerband
(Post 5985753)
According to industry speculation, it is likely that all future Mustangs will get this engine, not by choice but by an effort to preserve the car when all automobile companies eventually must meet federal mandatory for higher fuel-efficiency average.
|
Not a big deal...remember that the Taurus SHO will weigh more than your Stang (which means that the GT will still beat it in the quarter mile) and secondly from what I read, it is limited to 130MPH...so fear not...the Stang still rules.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:35 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands