2010 Mustang GT Dyno @ MAGNAFLOW
We just wrapped up our development on the 2010 Ford Mustang GT and have some dyno numbers for those curious about the output of the retuned 4.6L.
http://videos.streetfire.net/video/1...-at_640249.htm 2.5" Cat-back dyno http://www.magnaflow.com/richard/10F...0-%2014TQ).JPG 3.0" Cat-back dyno http://www.magnaflow.com/richard/10F...20HP-17TQ).JPG More MAGNAFLOW Exhaust Products: http://www.magnaflow.com/02product/02mustang.asp http://www.magnaflow.com/richard/10F.../underbody.JPG |
What were the actual HP numbers with the Exhaust?
|
WOW! nice numbers for just a 3" cat back
|
it gained 15hp and 17tq from the 3" catback? wow how much are they
|
wow pretty nice gains
|
Sorry to get off topic, but if the blue curve represents stock, then it has 290 hp stock. Estimating a 15% drive train loss, that mean it's ~341 hp at the flywheel. It's underrated and could be a sleeper!
|
Originally Posted by GerRod
(Post 6014632)
Sorry to get off topic, but if the blue curve represents stock, then it has 290 hp stock. Estimating a 15% drive train loss, that mean it's ~341 hp at the flywheel. It's underrated and could be a sleeper!
And that thing does sound badass! |
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.
|
Originally Posted by GerRod
(Post 6014632)
Sorry to get off topic, but if the blue curve represents stock, then it has 290 hp stock. Estimating a 15% drive train loss, that mean it's ~341 hp at the flywheel. It's underrated and could be a sleeper!
|
sounds great kinda confused why a 3" system on an NA 4.6l made more HP I could understand on a fi 4.6 or the 5.4 motor
|
Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
(Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.
|
Originally Posted by 4literv6
(Post 6017978)
sounds great kinda confused why a 3" system on an NA 4.6l made more HP I could understand on a fi 4.6 or the 5.4 motor
|
Originally Posted by bolivianpimp
(Post 6019248)
But isn't the 2010 mustang exactly like the 05-09 mustang just intake/tune? So, wouldn't this mean that we should see the same results if we put the catback into our models?
|
Very nice sound and I love my magnaflow magnapacks!!!!!!!!!!
|
Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
(Post 6017290)
Damn. Either that's a very generous dyno.........or the new GT's have a bit more than Ford's letting on about. Either way, over 300rwhp with just a catback is lightyears better than the 05-09's capabilities.
Ill believe it when I see a 2010 w/ only axel backs run mid 12's... |
while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it
|
It was probably a manual transmission on the dyno. Autos will see the usual lower results.
|
Originally Posted by ahddm
(Post 6036092)
while Jack was unvieling roush today he quoted stock gt at 350hp so this seems right to me. They are underrating it
Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam? |
Originally Posted by torque_is_good
(Post 6036161)
stock gt 350 FWHP?
Then they must have changed more than just a tune and CAI. Did they change the heads or cam? |
No way you gain that much from a cat back without putting headers in the equation. maybe 5rwhp............maybe
|
Talked to a Ford Mechanic today that always helps me out with my mustang...on the free. Anyhow we got on the subject of the 2010. He said exactly what I stated earlier the exact powertrain of the 2008 bullet with an adaptive/aggressive tune similar to steedas. But he said ford is begining to perfect the power of the phaser so I'm sure the new tune optimizes these.
|
Originally Posted by GerRod
(Post 6014632)
Sorry to get off topic, but if the blue curve represents stock, then it has 290 hp stock. Estimating a 15% drive train loss, that mean it's ~341 hp at the flywheel. It's underrated and could be a sleeper!
|
Originally Posted by ThisBlood147
(Post 6020225)
I thought that the 2010's would about on par with an intake/tune 05-09 also. But no catback has ever pushed an intake/tuned S197 over 300rwhp.....not that I know of. We'd have to do full exhaust with LT's to accomplish this. Either the computer on the new cars is radically different than ours (in a very good way)....or, like I said, this was a very generous dyno.
|
It's a little more mellow than mine, but the mufflers sound just about exactly like my straight through Magnaflows. I really love it.
|
Originally Posted by whtcanbrwnd04u
(Post 6089356)
I put out 300rwhp/318rwtq with bbk intake,brenspeed 93 octane tune, off road x and stingers. With 20s and texas heat.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:02 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands