cobrakiller347

ya riptide i gotta agree with u completely lol in most cases it ends up being driver error for the loser. btw i know my 09gt can beat up on stock srt8 chargers. and my car is pretty much stock. off topic and different vehicle just throwing it out there..

cobrakiller347

i know wat ur saying check their forums but they are biased the magazine drivers arent, also how many ppl are great drivers and run 12s with little to no mods (you)

Riptide

Magazine drivers don't drive the car as often and don't track the car nearly as often as an owner does. Take that and couple it with experience driving cars on a track for years and you'll get better times than they do. A timeslip doesn't lie. An owner certainly can but proving that is a tough one.

Ofcourse their forums might be biased but so is this one. If we want to play that game then everyone here who reports better than magazine times on their stock cars must be a liar then right? See where that leads to?

BRENSPEED

It wouldn't take much to beat the Challenger. They are so much heavier. An intake and tune would probably do it, but a Vortech V3 H/O a Saleen would also do the trick. You would actually destroy it.

S197steve

Errr... a stock SRT8 Charger runs low 13s / high 12s.

A 'pretty much stock' Mustang GT certainly isn't going to beat up on those sort of times!

Riptide

Exactly. And the s197 isn't exactly a light car either. It weighs upwards of 3400 pounds and has only 300hp @ the crank. The R/T for instance weighs around 300 more but has another 75hp.

JasperGT

I've seen completely stock Challengers run 13.2 at the track. That is all I'm saying.

DDS197

Its an auto. I just have borlas on my car. I was thinking just inake, tune ,and gears would be good but idk.... thats why i asked you guys

AmericanMuscle4.6GT

see sig for mods and times.

90% of my runs at the track are 12.95x's with this setup.

topbliss

not even close. At Atco the RT';s are barely in the 13's. Most mid 14's