Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N/A vs SC'd power loss at altitude??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009, 03:15 PM
  #1  
cummins cowboy
2nd Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
cummins cowboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: utah
Posts: 305
Default N/A vs SC'd power loss at altitude??

I heard mention by a couple people that a vehicle that runs a SC looses less power at high altitude, lets say you have a super charged mustang that is putting out 500 HP at the crank, then you have say a N/A Z06 corvette that is also running 500 hp at the crank. how much power loss do you think both cars would have at say 5000 ft,
cummins cowboy is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 07:45 PM
  #2  
jahudso2
4th Gear Member
 
jahudso2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location:
Posts: 1,599
Default

its all about barometric pressure. the maximum amount of pressure in the intake manifold of a naturally aspirated car is the outside pressure. The higher altitude you go, the less air pressure, and the less oxygen you get in the intake. turbocharged cars will still make around the same amount of boost no matter what the altitude is so the intake manifold pressure will not drop as much if you are at a higher altitude.

Last edited by jahudso2; 05-14-2009 at 04:21 AM.
jahudso2 is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 08:27 PM
  #3  
sleepless
 
sleepless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 22
Default

Originally Posted by cummins cowboy
I heard mention by a couple people that a vehicle that runs a SC looses less power at high altitude, lets say you have a super charged mustang that is putting out 500 HP at the crank, then you have say a N/A Z06 corvette that is also running 500 hp at the crank. how much power loss do you think both cars would have at say 5000 ft,
The loss will be the same since a supercharger has a fixed boost level based on the pulley size. Of course you could put on a smaller pulley to compensate; the N/A car is out of luck.
sleepless is offline  
Old 05-13-2009, 10:44 PM
  #4  
AmericanSpeed
5th Gear Member
 
AmericanSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 2,031
Default

get nitrous, you are bringing your own air
AmericanSpeed is offline  
Old 05-14-2009, 09:49 AM
  #5  
grampa_stang
4th Gear Member
 
grampa_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Utah
Posts: 1,249
Default

According to the NHRA correction factor. If a N/A car loses 1 second, and F/I car only loses .5. So, up at altitude, us N/A cars really have a disadvantage againt the FI guys ie: STI's and Evos.

See this link: http://www.nhra.net/tech_specs/altitude.html and scroll down...you'll see this

NOTE: Supercharged and/or turbocharged cars (i.e.: AA/A, AA/AT, BB/A, BB/AT, A/PM and AA/PM) use half factor; TA/D and TA/FC cars are not factored.

bottom line is yes...they only lose 50% of what us NA guys lose

Last edited by grampa_stang; 05-14-2009 at 10:02 AM.
grampa_stang is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
baddog671
Archive - Parts For Sale
20
07-26-2016 01:20 PM
KingRando
2005-2014 Mustangs
5
10-02-2015 08:06 AM
ChampInSD
5.0L GT S550 Tech
13
10-02-2015 04:55 AM
MustangForums Editor
General Tech
0
09-25-2015 06:58 PM



Quick Reply: N/A vs SC'd power loss at altitude??



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 AM.