Notices
2005-2014 Mustangs Discussions on the latest S197 model Mustangs from Ford.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Well Well Well. Mustang beats Camaro and Challanger on C&D.

Old 06-02-2009, 08:00 PM
  #21  
Ray's 08 GT
 
Ray's 08 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 19
Default

I'm happy for the mustang, but the 0-140 numbers are depressing.
Ray's 08 GT is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:04 PM
  #22  
boomee
2nd Gear Member
 
boomee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 352
Default

how manypeople are gonna be going up to 140 unless on a track ?
boomee is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:09 PM
  #23  
boomee
2nd Gear Member
 
boomee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by provofam
I had a Mini Cooper S before my Stang and although I absolutely loved it's handling, you still can't replace HP. I like all three cars and if it was just the blvd I'd pick the Challenger, but I like my vert. I'd still like to see Ford bump up the HP with a 5.0 How many of us have already added mods to increase our HP, the aftermarket is going to catch up quick on both the Mopar and the Chevy. I'm sure there's a lot of untapped power in both of those engines. Just my opinion, but I'm very happy to see all three companies offering cars that get the heart beating quicker!
I see what your saying but again in my opinion handling is king anyone can be fast on a the highway but throw some turns and you usually knock out alot of people. thats the the one reason i respect vettes and alot of import cars. Dont get me wrong i like tourque and hp but ithink there should be a healthy balance of both. I think that is the key to a good car is balance
boomee is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:17 PM
  #24  
Spilotro
2nd Gear Member
 
Spilotro's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: OK
Posts: 363
Default

I am disturbed by how heavy the new Challenger is... I'd still rather have a 1970 Hemi model, but good luck finding one of those
Spilotro is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:33 PM
  #25  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by boomee
how manypeople are gonna be going up to 140 unless on a track ?
Obviously more than you think.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:36 PM
  #26  
boomee
2nd Gear Member
 
boomee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by Bmr4life
Obviously more than you think.
well then it s pretty stupid ive lost several friends to that crap if anyone had half a brain they would save it for the track.
boomee is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:40 PM
  #27  
boomee
2nd Gear Member
 
boomee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 352
Default

Originally Posted by teksp0rt
Long live the 'notchback... +1!

... bad comparison with the Challenger R/T. They should have used the Challenger STR8. Either way, put a few more ponies in the Mustang (ahem, perhaps that 5.0 engine Ford) and we will have a MONSTER! We all know it is a better car, which is why we are on this forum.
that would have put the cars in a different price range all together so the R/t is the right comparison for this test now an srt8 vs a gt500 thatsgeting a little better for the scenario you are talking about.
boomee is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 09:46 PM
  #28  
Bmr4life
5th Gear Member
Thread Starter
 
Bmr4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ATL
Posts: 2,955
Default

Originally Posted by boomee
well then it s pretty stupid ive lost several friends to that crap if anyone had half a brain they would save it for the track.
tell that to C&D since they feel the need to post 0-140mph times for the muscle cars.

I don't know of many tracks that have cars running from a dead stop to 140mph unless they're super modded on a drag strip.
Bmr4life is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 10:21 PM
  #29  
thedrod
3rd Gear Member
 
thedrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Spring, TX
Posts: 816
Default

I have to completely agree with you on every one of your comments BMR4Life.

But I have to admit I was surprised to see the story outcome, but I am pleasantly surprised.

It's a horsepower vs weight race.

Now if only they could make the GT500 weigh 3600lbs....

I can't wait for that 5.0 DOHC motor either....
thedrod is offline  
Old 06-02-2009, 11:31 PM
  #30  
schmallz
2nd Gear Member
 
schmallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 392
Default

Originally Posted by Riptide
I don't understand why anyone would expect the challenger to be a small car. The original cars were big. So are the new ones. Shouldn't be any surprise.
The Old cars were "pony cars" which just means Compact Coupes.

The Challenger is huge, borderline Full Size coupe. Too big.
schmallz is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Well Well Well. Mustang beats Camaro and Challanger on C&D.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 AM.